Literature DB >> 33554029

Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self-Organized Task Switching.

Irina Monno1, Markus Spitzer1, Jeff Miller2, David Dignath1, Andrea Kiesel1.   

Abstract

Previous studies on voluntary task switching using the self-organized task switching paradigm suggest that task performance and task selection in multitasking are related. When deciding between two tasks, the stimulus associated with a task repetition occurred with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) that continuously increased with the number of repetitions, while the stimulus associated with a task switch was immediately available. Thus, the waiting time for the repetition stimulus increased with number of consecutive task repetitions. Two main results were shown: first, switch costs and voluntary switch rates correlated negatively - the smaller the switch costs, the larger the switch rates. Second, participants switched tasks when switch costs and waiting time for the repetition stimulus were similar. In the present study, we varied the SOA that increased with number of task repetitions (SOA increment) and also varied the size of the switch costs by varying the intertrial interval. We examined which combination of SOA increment and switch costs maximizes participants' attempts to balance waiting time and switch costs in self-organized task switching. We found that small SOA increments allow for fine-grained adaptation and that participants can best balance their switch costs and waiting times in settings with medium switch costs and small SOA increments. In addition, correlational analyses indicate relations between individual switch costs and individual switch rates across participants. Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  multitasking; switch costs; voluntary task-switching

Year:  2021        PMID: 33554029      PMCID: PMC7824981          DOI: 10.5334/joc.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn        ISSN: 2514-4820


  38 in total

1.  Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed?

Authors:  Baptist Liefooghe; Jelle Demanet; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Keep flexible - Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Kerstin Fröber; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

3.  Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes.

Authors:  Nick Yeung
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Conditioning task switching behavior.

Authors:  Senne Braem
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-06-05

Review 5.  Monitoring and control in multitasking.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; David Dignath; Marco Steinhauser; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

6.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Jonathan D Cohen; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Edita Poljac; Hermann Müller; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance.

Authors:  Jessika Reissland; Dietrich Manzey
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-05

9.  The capacity for generating information by randomization.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 10.  Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Franziska Plessow
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Timing of internal processes: Investigating introspection about the costs of task switching and memory search.

Authors:  Daniel Bratzke; Donna Bryce
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Individual Strategies of Response Organization in Multitasking Are Stable Even at Risk of High Between-Task Interference.

Authors:  Roman Reinert; Jovita Brüning
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Evaluating students' engagement with an online learning environment during and after COVID-19 related school closures: A survival analysis approach.

Authors:  Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer; Raphael Gutsfeld; Maria Wirzberger; Korbinian Moeller
Journal:  Trends Neurosci Educ       Date:  2021-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.