Literature DB >> 20192535

Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes.

Nick Yeung1.   

Abstract

Voluntary action can be studied by giving participants free choice over which task to perform in response to each presented stimulus. In such experiments, performance costs are observed when participants choose to switch tasks from the previous trial. It has been proposed that these costs primarily index the time-consuming operation of top-down control processes that support voluntary action. The present experiments showed, contrary to this view, that greater costs were associated with voluntary switching to the easier task of a pair. These increased switch costs for the easier task were accompanied by a reliable preference of the participants for performing the other, more difficult task. Interference between tasks during response selection was identified as the critical factor driving these effects of task difficulty. Together, the findings suggest that participants' voluntary choices, and the time taken to execute those choices, may not directly index the operation of cognitive control but instead may reflect complex interactions between top-down and bottom-up influences on behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20192535     DOI: 10.1037/a0017894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  26 in total

1.  Multitasking as a choice: a perspective.

Authors:  Laura Broeker; Roman Liepelt; Edita Poljac; Stefan Künzell; Harald Ewolds; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-10-30

2.  Working memory capacity modulates task performance but has little influence on task choice.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Catherine M Arrington; Christina Weywadt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

3.  Are there control processes, and (if so) can they be studied?

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; James F Sumowski; Micah Murray
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-29

4.  Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm.

Authors:  David A Braun; Catherine M Arrington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-26

5.  Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.

Authors:  Edina Fintor; Edita Poljac; Denise N Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-20

6.  Understanding Behavioural Rigidity in Autism Spectrum Conditions: The Role of Intentional Control.

Authors:  Edita Poljac; Vincent Hoofs; Myrthe M Princen; Ervin Poljac
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-03

7.  Encoding and choice in the task span paradigm.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Reiman; Starla M Weaver; Catherine M Arrington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-14

8.  Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Victor Mittelstädt; David Dignath; Magdalena Schmidt-Ott; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-04

9.  Task frequency influences stimulus-driven effects on task selection during voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Kaitlin M Reiman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

10.  Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.

Authors:  Victor Mittelstädt; Jeff Miller; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.