| Literature DB >> 33553926 |
Anwarhussaini Syed1, Himabindu Battula1, Sabyashachi Mishra2, Subbalakshmi Jayanty1.
Abstract
Tetracyanoquinodimethane (Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33553926 PMCID: PMC7860107 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Molecular packing diagrams exhibiting different orientations of molecular dipoles in (a) BAPMDQ [1] and (b) APMTQ [2].
Figure 2Prominent hydrogen bonding and significant weak intermolecular interactions (in yellow) in (a) [1]; C–H···π, N–H···O, C–H···O, N–H···N, CN···H and (b) [2]; C–H···O, O–C, CN···H, CN···C, C–C.
Significant Noncovalent Weak Intermolecular Interactions (Å) Detected in [1] and [2] with C–H···π and Hydrogen-Bond Type Ranging from Weak, Moderate, to Strong Leading to Different Orientations of Molecular Dipoles Consequently with Contrasting Optical Properties in the Solid State
| [ | 2.894, 2.724 | 1.917 | 2.643 | 7.175 | 2.142 | 2.600 | 2.860 | 3.211 | ||
| 2.814, 2.767 | 2.759 | 2.675 | 2.836 | |||||||
| 2.819, 2.788 | 2.588 | |||||||||
| 2.809, 2.836 | ||||||||||
| 2.384 | ||||||||||
| [ | 2.576 | 7.190 | 3.200 | 2.674 | 3.184 | 3.380 | ||||
| 2.136 | 3.138 | 2.746 | 3.141 | 3.397 | ||||||
| 2.488 | 3.163 | 2.596 | 3.049 | |||||||
| 2.411 | 3.006 | 3.215 |
Scheme 1BAPMDQ [1] and APMTQ [2] Obtained by the Reaction of TCNQ with APM
Figure 3Absorption spectra represented as [1] (orange) and [2] (brown-red); normalized emission spectra of [1] (yellow) and [2] (red) in DMF solutions. Substantial Stokes shifts of ∼114 nm in [1] and 134 nm in [2] are noted. The inset shows fluorescence of [1, 2] as (a, b) under visible light and (c, d) under short wavelength UV light respectively.
Figure 4Highlighted region shows π-electron conjugation in [1] and extended length of π-conjugation in [2] playing significant roles in the evolution fluorescence in solutions.
Figure 5Increased fluorescence intensity noted in all solutions considered in this study compared to solids [1] and [2]. (a) DMF solutions vs solids. Due to the highly zwitterionic nature, solution of [1] exhibited ∼20 times and [2] exhibited ∼4 times enhanced fluorescence than solid state. (b) Life time decay of [1, 2] showing less lifetimes of ∼0.03 ns in solutions. (c, d) CIE chromaticity plots of [1] and [2] corresponding to emission wavelengths as ∼576 and 620 nm in the solid state of both [1] and [2].
Figure 6KX (X = Br, Cl, I) ground samples of [1] and [2] manifesting color change within ∼1 min of grinding, detected by the naked eye.
Figure 7Absorption and emission spectra of pristine [1, 2] (black dotted line) and their KX ground samples. Shifts in λmax absorption and substantially enhanced fluorescence in ground samples compared to pristine indicate strong electrostatic interaction with KX. (a) [1] ground with KBr (red), KCl (green), and KI (blue), blueshift of ∼12 nm (in absorption) and ∼22 nm (in emission) with ∼554 nm being λmax, emission. (b) [2] ground with KBr (red), KCl (green), and KI (blue). A redshift of ∼25 nm (in absorption), a blue shift of ∼24 nm (in emission), and a maximum emission wavelength of ∼596 nm are observed. Similar wavelengths of emission in each [1, 2] designate fixed excited states in each solid.
Figure 8HOMO and LUMO of molecule [1] in the absence of potassium ions (a, b) and in the presence of potassium ions (c, d).
Figure 9HOMO and LUMO of molecule [2] in the absence of potassium ions (a, b) and in the presence of potassium ions (c, d).
Figure 10Dynamic stability of potassium ion in [2] assembly. The time evolution of the distance between potassium ion and O atom and the perpendicular distance of the potassium ion from the aromatic ring obtained from atom-centered density matrix propagation. The inset shows the last snapshot of the trajectory. The hydrogen atoms are not shown for clarity.
Figure 11Plausible molecular structures emanating from solid-state grinding of KX (X = Br, Cl, I) with [1] and [2] as a recognition phenomenon due to key role played by the carbonyl functionality on the ring. The anions are supposed to be trapped in the solid matrix.
Figure 12Scanning electron microscope images of [1, 2] drop-cast on silicon wafer showing discrete morphological features. Drop-cast solutions of (a–c) [1] and (d–f) [2] in acetonitrile, methanol, and DMF, respectively.
Figure 13Scanning electron microscope images of [1, 2] in pristine and KX (X = Br, Cl, I) ground samples obtained by grinding 1 mg of pristine sample with 100 mg of KX considered in our study. (a, e) Pure [1, 2]; (b–d) and (f–h) KX ground sample of [1] and [2], respectively, with X = Br, Cl, I. Pure sample reveals crystalline morphology, and ground samples in either indicate the binding of [1, 2] with KX in the solid state manifesting closely packed aggregates. The highlighted region shows certain voids in (c), (g), and (h).
Figure 14(a) Cyclic voltammogram (CV) of [1, 2] in dry acetonitrile recorded at 25 mV s–1 scan rate with the supporting electrolyte being 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium perchlorate solution. (b, c) Kubelka–Munk plots of [1, 2] achieved from the diffuse reflectance study (DRS) spectra for ΔEgopt calculation.
Figure 15Scan-rate-dependent cyclic voltammograms of the samples (a) [1] and (c) [2] in a scan rate range of 50–500 mV s–1 for [1] and 50–450 mV s–1 for [2]; variation of anodic peak current at 2.85 V with a square root of scan rate (b) for [1] and (d) for [2].
Figure 16Protocol followed for the separation and isolation of the products [1] and [2].