Aims: Curved M-mode images of global strain (GS) and strain rate (GSR) provide sufficiently detailed spatiotemporal information of deformation mechanics. This study investigated whether a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) could accurately classify these images in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) with different outcomes. Methods and Results: We retrospectively evaluated 606 consecutive patients who underwent RFCA for drug-refractory AF. Patients were divided into AF-free (n = 443) and AF-recurrent (n = 163) groups. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 24 h after RFCA. Left atrial curved M-mode speckle-tracking images were acquired from randomly selected 163 patients in AF-free group and 163 patients in AF-recurrent group as the dataset for deep CNN modeling. We used the ReLu activation function and repeatedly performed CNN model for 32 times to evaluate the stability of hyperparameters. Logistic regression models with the left atrial dimension, emptying fraction, and peak systolic GS as predictor variables were used for comparisons. Images from the apical 2-chamber (2-C) and 4-chamber (4-C) views had distinct features, leading to different CNN performance between settings; of them, the "4-C GS+4-C GSR" setting provided the highest performance index values. All four predictor variables used for logistic regression modeling were significant; however, none of them, individually or in any combined form, could outperform the optimal CNN model. Conclusion: The novel approach using deep CNNs for learning features of left atrial curved M-mode speckle-tracking images seems to be optimal for classifying outcome status after AF ablation.
Aims: Curved M-mode images of global strain (GS) and strain rate (GSR) provide sufficiently detailed spatiotemporal information of deformation mechanics. This study investigated whether a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) could accurately classify these images in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) with different outcomes. Methods and Results: We retrospectively evaluated 606 consecutive patients who underwent RFCA for drug-refractory AF. Patients were divided into AF-free (n = 443) and AF-recurrent (n = 163) groups. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 24 h after RFCA. Left atrial curved M-mode speckle-tracking images were acquired from randomly selected 163 patients in AF-free group and 163 patients in AF-recurrent group as the dataset for deep CNN modeling. We used the ReLu activation function and repeatedly performed CNN model for 32 times to evaluate the stability of hyperparameters. Logistic regression models with the left atrial dimension, emptying fraction, and peak systolic GS as predictor variables were used for comparisons. Images from the apical 2-chamber (2-C) and 4-chamber (4-C) views had distinct features, leading to different CNN performance between settings; of them, the "4-C GS+4-C GSR" setting provided the highest performance index values. All four predictor variables used for logistic regression modeling were significant; however, none of them, individually or in any combined form, could outperform the optimal CNN model. Conclusion: The novel approach using deep CNNs for learning features of left atrial curved M-mode speckle-tracking images seems to be optimal for classifying outcome status after AF ablation.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Luigi P Badano; Theodore J Kolias; Denisa Muraru; Theodore P Abraham; Gerard Aurigemma; Thor Edvardsen; Jan D'Hooge; Erwan Donal; Alan G Fraser; Thomas Marwick; Luc Mertens; Bogdan A Popescu; Partho P Sengupta; Patrizio Lancellotti; James D Thomas; Jens-Uwe Voigt Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Xin-Xin Ma; Leif-Hendrik Boldt; Yue-Li Zhang; Meng-Ruo Zhu; Bing Hu; Abdul Parwani; Evgeny Belyavskiy; Aravind K Radha Krishnan; Maximilian Krisper; Clemens Köhncke; Engin Osmanoglou; Martin Kropf; Philipp Lacour; Florian Blaschke; Frank Edelmann; Carsten Tschöpe; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher; Burkert Pieske; Daniel A Morris Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Christian Knackstedt; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Georg Schummers; Marcus Schreckenberg; Denisa Muraru; Luigi P Badano; Andreas Franke; Chirag Bavishi; Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar; Partho P Sengupta Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Maria Concetta Pastore; Giuseppe De Carli; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Marta Focardi; Francesco Contorni; Sergio Mondillo; Matteo Cameli Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Zsuzsanna Kahán; Tamás Csont; Márta Sárközy; Zoltán Varga; Renáta Gáspár; Gergő Szűcs; Mónika G Kovács; Zsuzsanna Z A Kovács; László Dux Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Felix K Wegner; Lucas Plagwitz; Florian Doldi; Christian Ellermann; Kevin Willy; Julian Wolfes; Sarah Sandmann; Julian Varghese; Lars Eckardt Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 6.138