Shane Hanzlik1, Andrew J Riff2, Thomas H Wuerz3, Michael Abdulian4, Danielle Gurin5, Shane J Nho2, Michael J Salata1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, UH Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States. 2. Rush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, United States. 3. Sports and Orthopaedic Specialists, Edina, MN, United States. 4. Glendale Orthopaedics, Glendale, CA, United States. 5. Cleveland Clinic South Pointe, Warrensville Heights, OH, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity. Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities. Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study.
Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of camdeformity in the population and that of bilateral camdeformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity. Results:Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The population prevalence of camdeformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities. Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study.
Authors: Konstantinos Tsitskaris; Khalid Sharif; Lisa M Meacock; Mohit Bansal; Salma Ayis; Patrick L S Li; David A Elias Journal: Hip Int Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Rintje Agricola; Marinus P Heijboer; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans; Jan H Waarsing Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Lene B Laborie; Trude G Lehmann; Ingvild Ø Engesæter; Deborah M Eastwood; Lars B Engesæter; Karen Rosendahl Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: August Estberger; Anders Pålsson; Ioannis Kostogiannis; Eva Ageberg Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-09-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: B G Faber; A E Hartley; B E Zucker; R Ebsim; C Lindner; S Hardcastle; T Cootes; J H Tobias; M R Whitehouse; C L Gregson Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 2.562