Literature DB >> 33552723

The association of fracture risk in atrial fibrillation patients and long-term anticoagulant therapy category: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jun Chen1, Lingchun Lyu2, Jiayi Shen2, Chunlai Zeng2, Cheng Chen2, Tiemin Wei2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to assess the risk of all fractures and hip fractures in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who took non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared to warfarin.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials.gov Website. Reviewed related researches up to January 31, 2020, to identify studies with more than 12 months of follow-up data. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO Number: CRD42020156893).
RESULTS: We included five RCT studies, and five observational studies that contained a total of 326,846 patients in our meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that patients taken NOACs had no significant all fracture risk (RR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.81-1.01]) and hip fracture risk (RR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.82-1.03]) compared with those taken warfarin. Subanalysis showed that the risk of all fractures and hip fractures treated by NOACs were significant lower compared with warfarin in observational studies compared with RCT studies. Also, a subanalysis across the duration of anticoagulation showed the NOACs users have lower all fracture risk than warfarin users when the duration of anticoagulation ≤2 years (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.80-0.99]). Further analysis, significant lower all fracture risk in the rivaroxaban therapy (RR = 0.81; 95% CI [0.76-0.86]) compared with warfarin but no statistical significance in hip fracture. There were no significant difference of all fracture risk and hip fracture risk in dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban therapy compared with warfarin.
CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis demonstrated that NOACs associated with a significantly lower all fracture risk compared with warfarin when the duration of anticoagulation more than 2 years. Rivaroxaban users had lower risk of all fracture than warfarin users in AF patients. But there was no evidence to verify apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatranin could decrease all fracture and hip fracture risk compared with warfarin. ©2021 Chen et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Fracture; Meta-analysis; Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; Warfarin

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552723      PMCID: PMC7842143          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  26 in total

1.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Association Between Vitamin K Antagonist Use and Fracture.

Authors:  Wendy Fiordellisi; Katherine White; Marin Schweizer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation – the J-ROCKET AF study –.

Authors:  Masatsugu Hori; Masayasu Matsumoto; Norio Tanahashi; Shin-ichi Momomura; Shinichiro Uchiyama; Shinya Goto; Tohru Izumi; Yukihiro Koretsune; Mariko Kajikawa; Masaharu Kato; Hitoshi Ueda; Kazuya Iwamoto; Masahiro Tajiri
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Jyotsna Garg; Guohua Pan; Daniel E Singer; Werner Hacke; Günter Breithardt; Jonathan L Halperin; Graeme J Hankey; Jonathan P Piccini; Richard C Becker; Christopher C Nessel; John F Paolini; Scott D Berkowitz; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Risk of osteoporotic fracture in elderly patients taking warfarin: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation 2.

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Elena Birman-Deych; Martha J Radford; David S Nilasena; Ellen F Binder
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-23

5.  Osteoporotic Fractures in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Conventional Versus Direct Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Casper Binding; Jonas Bjerring Olesen; Bo Abrahamsen; Laila Staerk; Gunnar Gislason; Anders Nissen Bonde
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Association Between Dabigatran vs Warfarin and Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures Among Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Wallis C Y Lau; Esther W Chan; Ching-Lung Cheung; Chor Wing Sing; Kenneth K C Man; Gregory Y H Lip; Chung-Wah Siu; Joanne K Y Lam; Alan C H Lee; Ian C K Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Association of Anticoagulant Therapy With Risk of Fracture Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Pamela L Lutsey; Faye L Norby; Kristine E Ensrud; Richard F MacLehose; Susan J Diem; Lin Y Chen; Alvaro Alonso
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Fabian Sanchis-Gomar; Gianfranco Cervellin
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 5.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.