Literature DB >> 33552121

Independent Validation of Genomic Prediction in Strawberry Over Multiple Cycles.

Luis F Osorio1, Salvador A Gezan2, Sujeet Verma1, Vance M Whitaker1.   

Abstract

The University of Florida strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) breeding program has implemented genomic prediction (GP) as a tool for choosing outstanding parents for crosses over the last five seasons. This has allowed the use of some parents 1 year earlier than with traditional methods, thus reducing the duration of the breeding cycle. However, as the number of breeding cycles increases over time, greater knowledge is needed on how multiple cycles can be used in the practical implementation of GP in strawberry breeding. Advanced selections and cultivars totaling 1,558 unique individuals were tested in field trials for yield and fruit quality traits over five consecutive years and genotyped for 9,908 SNP markers. Prediction of breeding values was carried out using Bayes B models. Independent validation was carried out using separate trials/years as training (TRN) and testing (TST) populations. Single-trial predictive abilities for five polygenic traits averaged 0.35, which was reduced to 0.24 when individuals common across trials were excluded, emphasizing the importance of relatedness among training and testing populations. Training populations including up to four previous breeding cycles increased predictive abilities, likely due to increases in both training population size and relatedness. Predictive ability was also strongly influenced by heritability, but less so by changes in linkage disequilibrium and effective population size. Genotype by year interactions were minimal. A strategy for practical implementation of GP in strawberry breeding is outlined that uses multiple cycles to predict parental performance and accounts for traits not included in GP models when constructing crosses. Given the importance of relatedness to the success of GP in strawberry, future work could focus on the optimization of relatedness in the design of TRN and TST populations to increase predictive ability in the short-term without compromising long-term genetic gains.
Copyright © 2021 Osorio, Gezan, Verma and Whitaker.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes B; Fragaria; breeding; genome-wide prediction; test population; training population

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552121      PMCID: PMC7862747          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.596258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


  50 in total

1.  Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend.

Authors:  A Smith; B Cullis; R Thompson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit.

Authors:  P R Amer; G Banos
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Novel measures of linkage disequilibrium that correct the bias due to population structure and relatedness.

Authors:  B Mangin; A Siberchicot; S Nicolas; A Doligez; P This; C Cierco-Ayrolles
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Increasing Genomic-Enabled Prediction Accuracy by Modeling Genotype × Environment Interactions in Kansas Wheat.

Authors:  Diego Jarquín; Cristiano Lemes da Silva; R Chris Gaynor; Jesse Poland; Allan Fritz; Reka Howard; Sarah Battenfield; Jose Crossa
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data.

Authors:  Diego Jarquín; José Crossa; Xavier Lacaze; Philippe Du Cheyron; Joëlle Daucourt; Josiane Lorgeou; François Piraux; Laurent Guerreiro; Paulino Pérez; Mario Calus; Juan Burgueño; Gustavo de los Campos
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.

Authors:  Helena Oakey; Brian Cullis; Robin Thompson; Jordi Comadran; Claire Halpin; Robbie Waugh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genomic selection across multiple breeding cycles in applied bread wheat breeding.

Authors:  Sebastian Michel; Christian Ametz; Huseyin Gungor; Doru Epure; Heinrich Grausgruber; Franziska Löschenberger; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the diversity and genetic structure of the U.S. National Cultivated Strawberry Collection.

Authors:  Jason D Zurn; Kim E Hummer; Nahla V Bassil
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.291

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.