Literature DB >> 33551936

How Social Power Affects the Processing of Angry Expressions: Evidence From Behavioral and Electrophysiological Data.

Entao Zhang1,2, Xueling Ma1,2, Ruiwen Tao1,2, Tao Suo1,2, Huang Gu1,2, Yongxin Li2.   

Abstract

With the help of event-related potentials (ERPs), the present study used an oddball paradigm to investigate how both individual and target power modulate neural responses to angry expressions. Specifically, participants were assigned into a high-power or low-power condition. Then, they were asked to detect a deviant angry expression from a high-power or low-power target among a series of neutral expressions, while behavioral responses and electroencephalogram (EEG) were recorded. The behavioral results showed that high-power individuals responded faster to detect angry expressions than low-power individuals. The ERP analysis showed that high-power individuals showed larger P3 amplitudes in response to angry expressions than low-power individuals did. Target power increased the amplitudes of the P1, VPP, N3, and P3 in response to angry expressions did, but decreased the amplitudes of the N1 and N170 in response to angry expressions. The present study extended previous studies by showing that having more power could enhance individuals' neural responses to angry expressions in the late-stage processes, and individuals could show stronger neural responses to angry expressions from high-power persons in both the early- and late-stage processes.
Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Ma, Tao, Suo, Gu and Li.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P1; P3; angry faces; event-related potentials; social power

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551936      PMCID: PMC7858247          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.626522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  41 in total

1.  Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

2.  Power, approach, and inhibition.

Authors:  Dacher Keltner; Deborah H Gruenfeld; Cameron Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The amygdala and FFA track both social and non-social face dimensions.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; Ron Dotsch; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The 'when' and 'where' of perceiving signals of threat versus non-threat.

Authors:  Leanne M Williams; Donna Palmer; Belinda J Liddell; Le Song; Evian Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The effect of reactive emotions expressed in response to another's anger on inferences of social power.

Authors:  Shlomo Hareli; Shlomo David
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2017-01-12

6.  Gender differences in preattentive processing of facial expressions: an ERP study.

Authors:  Qiang Xu; Yaping Yang; Pei Wang; Gang Sun; Lun Zhao
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Emotional arousal deficit or emotional regulation bias? An electrophysiological study of age-related differences in emotion perception.

Authors:  James R Houston; Joshua W Pollock; Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  Transforming the mirror: power fundamentally changes facial responding to emotional expressions.

Authors:  Evan W Carr; Piotr Winkielman; Christopher Oveis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-11-11

9.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans.

Authors:  Shlomo Bentin; Truett Allison; Aina Puce; Erik Perez; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Higher Status Honesty Is Worth More: The Effect of Social Status on Honesty Evaluation.

Authors:  Philip R Blue; Jie Hu; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.