Literature DB >> 24219023

Transforming the mirror: power fundamentally changes facial responding to emotional expressions.

Evan W Carr1, Piotr Winkielman1, Christopher Oveis2.   

Abstract

Major theories propose that spontaneous responding to others' actions involves mirroring, or direct matching. Responding to facial expressions is assumed to follow this matching principle: People smile to smiles and frown to frowns. We demonstrate here that social power fundamentally changes spontaneous facial mimicry of emotional expressions, thereby challenging the direct-matching principle. Participants induced into a high-power (HP), low-power (LP), or neutral state watched dynamic happy and angry expressions from HP and LP targets while we measured facial electromyography (fEMG) over the zygomaticus major ("smiling muscle") and corrugator supercilii ("frowning muscle"). For smiling, LP participants smiled to all targets, regardless of their expression. In contrast, HP participants exhibited standard smile mimicry toward LP targets but did not mimic the smiles of HP targets. Instead, HP participants smiled more when those HP targets expressed anger. For frowning, all participants showed a more intense mimicry pattern to HP targets. These results demonstrate that spontaneous facial responding-detected by sensitive, physiological measures of muscle activation-dynamically adapts to contextual cues of social hierarchy. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24219023     DOI: 10.1037/a0034972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry?

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses.

Authors:  M Cikara; E Bruneau; J J Van Bavel; R Saxe
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-11-01

3.  Stressed connections: cortisol levels following acute psychosocial stress disrupt affiliative mimicry in humans.

Authors:  Jonas P Nitschke; Cecile S Sunahara; Evan W Carr; Piotr Winkielman; Jens C Pruessner; Jennifer A Bartz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Near-wins and near-losses in gambling: a behavioral and facial EMG study.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Eric van Dijk; Luke Clark
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Facial mimicry in its social setting.

Authors:  Beate Seibt; Andreas Mühlberger; Katja U Likowski; Peter Weyers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11

Review 6.  When mirroring is both simple and "smart": how mimicry can be embodied, adaptive, and non-representational.

Authors:  Evan W Carr; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Status and Power Do Not Modulate Automatic Imitation of Intransitive Hand Movements.

Authors:  Harry Farmer; Evan W Carr; Marita Svartdal; Piotr Winkielman; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The Functionality of Spontaneous Mimicry and Its Influences on Affiliation: An Implicit Socialization Account.

Authors:  Liam C Kavanagh; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  Emotional Empathy and Facial Mimicry for Static and Dynamic Facial Expressions of Fear and Disgust.

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23

10.  Power Moves Beyond Complementarity: A Staring Look Elicits Avoidance in Low Power Perceivers and Approach in High Power Perceivers.

Authors:  Mario Weick; Cade McCall; Jim Blascovich
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.