Literature DB >> 33551906

Attraction Effects for Verbal Gender and Number Are Similar but Not Identical: Self-Paced Reading Evidence From Modern Standard Arabic.

Matthew A Tucker1,2, Ali Idrissi3, Diogo Almeida1.   

Abstract

Previous work on the comprehension of agreement has shown that incorrectly inflected verbs do not trigger responses typically seen with fully ungrammatical verbs when the preceding sentential context furnishes a possibly matching distractor noun (i.e., agreement attraction). We report eight studies, three being direct replications, designed to assess the degree of similarity of these errors in the comprehension of subject-verb agreement along the dimensions of grammatical gender and number in Modern Standard Arabic. A meta-analysis of the results demonstrate the presence of agreement attraction effects in reading comprehension for gender and number on verbs. Moreover, the meta-analysis demonstrates that these two features do not behave identically: gender effects are larger and occur later relative to number attraction effects. These results challenge models of agreement that predict agreement features to be equipotent and show that real-time models of agreement require modifications in the form of cue-weighting in order to account for these differential results.
Copyright © 2021 Tucker, Idrissi and Almeida.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabic; agreement; agreement attraction; meta-analysis; phi-features; self-paced reading; verbal gender; verbal number

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551906      PMCID: PMC7859339          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  34 in total

1.  Some attractions of verb agreement.

Authors:  K Bock; K M Eberhard; J C Cutting; A S Meyer; H Schriefers
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement.

Authors:  Robert J Hartsuiker; Herbert J Schriefers; Kathryn Bock; Gerdien M Kikstra
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

3.  Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming; Sue Finch
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005 Feb-Mar

4.  Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production.

Authors:  Kathleen M Eberhard; J Cooper Cutting; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-12-08

6.  Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-07

7.  The grammaticality asymmetry in agreement attraction reflects response bias: Experimental and modeling evidence.

Authors:  Christopher Hammerly; Adrian Staub; Brian Dillon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Exploratory and Confirmatory Analyses in Sentence Processing: A Case Study of Number Interference in German.

Authors:  Bruno Nicenboim; Shravan Vasishth; Felix Engelmann; Katja Suckow
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-02-07

9.  Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.

Authors:  Sandra Villata; Whitney Tabor; Julie Franck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-19

10.  Task-dependency and structure-dependency in number interference effects in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Julie Franck; Saveria Colonna; Luigi Rizzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Role of Case Syncretism in Agreement Attraction: A Comprehension Study.

Authors:  Natalia Slioussar; Varvara Magomedova; Polina Makarova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.