Alessandro Pinheiro1,2, Lauro C Vianna3,4, Jake C Carmo5. 1. Faculty of Technology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. 2. Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. 3. NeuroV̇AṠQ - Integrative Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. 4. Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. 5. Biological Signals Processing Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Abstract
Background: The blood pressure responses to baroreflex perturbations can be assessed only using the variable-pressure neck chamber technique. However, the application of this approach in hospital environments is limited owing to the loud noise emitted during its operation. This study was aimed at developing a noiseless neck suction chamber device (NCD) that could stimulate the baroreceptors located in the carotid sinus in humans. Methods: A non-invasive device was developed to pressurize the carotid arteries externally. A microcontroller with a computer interface and neck chamber (3D-printed) was used. The anatomical neck chamber was fitted on six healthy, young, asymptomatic participants (five men; 32 ± 6 year), who were normotensive, nonsmoking, in sinus rhythm, free of known cardiovascular or metabolic diseases, and not consuming any acute or chronic medications. A suction of -60 mmHg was applied for 5 s, and the corresponding data were recorded. Before each study visit, the participants were instructed to abstain from caffeine, alcohol, and strenuous exercise for 12-24 h. Results: In all the trials, a significant reflex bradycardia (-10 ± 2 bpm) and depressor response (-15 ± 4 mmHg) to neck suction were observed, consistent with the results in the literature. The neck chamber device operated noiselessly [sound pressure level (SPL) of 34.3 dB] compared to a regular vacuum-cleaner-based system (74.6 dB). Conclusion: Using the proposed approach, consistent blood pressure and heart rate responses to carotid baroreflex hypertensive stimuli could be recorded, as in previous studies conducted using neck collar devices. Furthermore, the neck chamber device operated noiselessly and can thus be applied in hospital environments.
Background: The blood pressure responses to baroreflex perturbations can be assessed only using the variable-pressure neck chamber technique. However, the application of this approach in hospital environments is limited owing to the loud noise emitted during its operation. This study was aimed at developing a noiseless neck suction chamber device (NCD) that could stimulate the baroreceptors located in the carotid sinus in humans. Methods: A non-invasive device was developed to pressurize the carotid arteries externally. A microcontroller with a computer interface and neck chamber (3D-printed) was used. The anatomical neck chamber was fitted on six healthy, young, asymptomatic participants (five men; 32 ± 6 year), who were normotensive, nonsmoking, in sinus rhythm, free of known cardiovascular or metabolic diseases, and not consuming any acute or chronic medications. A suction of -60 mmHg was applied for 5 s, and the corresponding data were recorded. Before each study visit, the participants were instructed to abstain from caffeine, alcohol, and strenuous exercise for 12-24 h. Results: In all the trials, a significant reflex bradycardia (-10 ± 2 bpm) and depressor response (-15 ± 4 mmHg) to neck suction were observed, consistent with the results in the literature. The neck chamber device operated noiselessly [sound pressure level (SPL) of 34.3 dB] compared to a regular vacuum-cleaner-based system (74.6 dB). Conclusion: Using the proposed approach, consistent blood pressure and heart rate responses to carotid baroreflex hypertensive stimuli could be recorded, as in previous studies conducted using neck collar devices. Furthermore, the neck chamber device operated noiselessly and can thus be applied in hospital environments.
Authors: Daniel P Credeur; Seth W Holwerda; Leryn J Boyle; Lauro C Vianna; Areum K Jensen; Paul J Fadel Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Davor Krnjajic; Dustin R Allen; Cory L Butts; David M Keller Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Thomas Münzel; Frank P Schmidt; Sebastian Steven; Johannes Herzog; Andreas Daiber; Mette Sørensen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sofia K Konstantinidou; Georgia Argyrakopoulou; Nicholas Tentolouris; Vangelis Karalis; Alexander Kokkinos Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 2.447