Literature DB >> 33551144

Is There an Association Between Negative Patient-Experience Comments and Perioperative Outcomes After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Patawut Bovonratwet1, Tony S Shen1, Wasif Islam2, Peter K Sculco2, Douglas E Padgett2, Edwin P Su2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple stakeholders are interested in improving patient experience after primary total hip arthroplasty due to shifts toward patient-centered care. Patient free-text narratives are a potentially valuable but largely unexplored source of data.
METHODS: The records of 383 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between August 2016 and August 2019 were combined with vendor-supplied patient satisfaction data, which included patient free-text comments and the Press Ganey satisfaction survey. A total of 1295 patient comments were analyzed for sentiment, and negative comments were categorized into nine themes. Postoperative outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures, and traditional measures of satisfaction were compared between patients who provided a negative comment vs those who did not. Multivariable regression was used to determine perioperative variables associated with providing a negative comment.
RESULTS: Of the 1295 patient comments: 54% were positive, 24% were negative, 10% were mixed, and 12% were neutral. Top two themes of negative comments were room condition (25%) and inefficient communication (23%). There were no differences in studied outcomes (eg. peak pain intensity, length of stay, or improvements in hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores Jr. and pain visual analog scale scores at 6-week follow-up) between those who provided negative comments vs those who did not (P > .05). However, patients who made negative comments were less likely to recommend their hospital care to peers (P < .001). Finally, patients who had >2 allergies (P = .024) were more likely to provide negative comments.
CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that patient satisfaction appears not to be a reliable sole proxy for traditional objective outcome measures of pain relief and functional improvement.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HOOS Jr; PROM; patient experience; patient satisfaction; press ganey; primary total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551144     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score 12.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Ilaria Piergentili; Anna Indiveri; Calogero Di Naro; Giulia Santamaria; Anna Marchetti; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The Forgotten Joint Score patient-acceptable symptom state following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vivek Singh; Thomas Bieganowski; Shengnan Huang; Raj Karia; Roy I Davidovitch; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-04

Review 3.  Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiumei Tang; Yahao Lai; Siwei Du; Ning Ning
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.