Literature DB >> 33550230

Journey to facility birth in Zanzibar: a questionnaire-based cohort study of patients' perspectives on preparedness, access and quality of care.

Tanneke Herklots1, Lara D'haene2, Khairat Said Mbarouk3, Mubina Rajhy3, Simone Couperus4, Tarek Meguid5, Arie Franx6, Maria P H Koster6, Benoit Jacod7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tackling substandard maternity care in health facilities requires engaging women's perspectives in strategies to improve outcomes. This study aims to provide insights in the perspectives of women with severe maternal morbidity on preparedness, access and quality of care in Zanzibar's referral hospital.
METHODS: In a prospective cohort from April 2017 to December 2018, we performed semistructured interviews with women who experienced maternal near-miss complications and matched controls. These focused on sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics, perceived accessibility to and quality of facility care with 15 domains, scored on a one-to-five scale. Participants' comments and answers to open questions were employed to illustrate quantitative outcomes. Zanzibar's Medical Research and Ethics Committee approved the study (ZAMREC/0002/JUN/17).
RESULTS: We included 174 cases and 151 controls. Compared with controls, patients with a near-miss had less formal education (p=0.049), perceived their wealth as poor (p=0.002) and had a stillbirth more often (p<0.001). Many experienced a delay in deciding to seek care. More than controls, near-miss patients experienced barriers in reaching care (p=0.049), often of financial nature (13.8% vs 4.0%). Quality of care was perceived as high, with means above 3 out of 5, in 14 out of 15 domains. One-fifth had an overall suboptimal experience, mostly regarding informed choice and supplies availability. Additional comments were expressed by a minority of participants.
CONCLUSION: Most patients promptly sought, accessed and received maternity care in Zanzibar's referral hospital. A minority experienced barriers, mostly financial, in reaching care and more so among patients with near-miss complications. Quality of facility care was generally highly rated. However, some reported insightful critical perceptions. This study highlights the impact of sociodemographic differences on health, the value of involving patients in decisions regarding maternity care and the need to ensure availability of medical supplies, all which will contribute to improved maternal well-being. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maternal medicine; organisation of health services; quality in health care; reproductive medicine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33550230      PMCID: PMC7925926          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  18 in total

Review 1.  Using human rights in maternal mortality programs: from analysis to strategy.

Authors:  L P Freedman
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Metasynthesis: Experiences of Women with Severe Maternal Morbidity and Their Perception of the Quality of Health Care.

Authors:  Mohd Noor Norhayati; Sukeri Surianti; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors influencing the capacity of women to voice their concerns about maternal health services in the Muanda and Bolenge Health Zones, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a multi-method study.

Authors:  Eric M Mafuta; Tjard De Cock Buning; Didier L Lolobi; Papy M Mayala; Thérèse N M Mambu; Patrick K Kayembe; Marjolein A Dieleman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Unpacking the enabling factors for hand, cord and birth-surface hygiene in Zanzibar maternity units.

Authors:  Giorgia Gon; Said M Ali; Catriona Towriss; Catherine Kahabuka; Ali O Ali; Sue Cavill; Mohammed Dahoma; Sally Faulkner; Haji S Haji; Ibrahim Kabole; Emma Morrison; Rukaiya M Said; Amour Tajo; Yael Velleman; Susannah L Woodd; And Wendy J Graham
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.344

6.  The experiences of women with maternal near miss and their perception of quality of care in Kelantan, Malaysia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina; Ab Razak Asrenee; Zaharah Sulaiman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Validity of WHO's near-miss approach in a high maternal mortality setting.

Authors:  Tanneke Herklots; Lieke van Acht; Rashid Saleh Khamis; Tarek Meguid; Arie Franx; Benoit Jacod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Listening to women's voices: the quality of care of women experiencing severe maternal morbidity, in Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Ozge Tunçalp; Michelle J Hindin; Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh; Richard Adanu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The status of maternal and newborn health care services in Zanzibar.

Authors:  Bakar Fakih; Azzah A S Nofly; Ali O Ali; Abdallah Mkopi; Ali Hassan; Ali M Ali; Kate Ramsey; Theopista John Kabuteni; Godfrey Mbaruku; Mwifadhi Mrisho
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Direct observation of respectful maternity care in five countries: a cross-sectional study of health facilities in East and Southern Africa.

Authors:  Heather E Rosen; Pamela F Lynam; Catherine Carr; Veronica Reis; Jim Ricca; Eva S Bazant; Linda A Bartlett
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.