Khanh B Tran1,2,3, Sharada Kolekar1, Anower Jabed2, Patrick Jaynes2, Jen-Hsing Shih2, Qian Wang2, Jack U Flanagan1,3, Gordon W Rewcastle1,3, Bruce C Baguley1,3, Peter R Shepherd4,5,6. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. peter.shepherd@auckland.ac.nz. 5. Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. peter.shepherd@auckland.ac.nz. 6. Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New Zealand. peter.shepherd@auckland.ac.nz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The PI 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway has been implicated as a target for melanoma therapy. METHODS: Given the high degree of genetic heterogeneity in melanoma, we sought to understand the breadth of variation in PI3K signalling in the large NZM panel of early passage cell lines developed from metastatic melanomas. RESULTS: We find the vast majority of lines show upregulation of this pathway, and this upregulation is achieved by a wide range of mechanisms. Expression of all class-IA PI3K isoforms was readily detected in these cell lines. A range of genetic changes in different components of the PI3K pathway was seen in different lines. Coding variants or amplification were identified in the PIK3CA gene, and amplification of the PK3CG gene was common. Deletions in the PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 regulatory subunits were also relatively common. Notably, no genetic variants were seen in the PIK3CD gene despite p110δ being expressed in many of the lines. Genetic variants were detected in a number of genes that encode phosphatases regulating the PI3K signalling, with reductions in copy number common in PTEN, INPP4B, INPP5J, PHLLP1 and PHLLP2 genes. While the pan-PI3K inhibitor ZSTK474 attenuated cell growth in all the lines tested, isoform-selective inhibition of p110α and p110δ inhibited cell growth in only a subset of the lines and the inhibition was only partial. This suggests that functional redundancy exists between PI3K isoforms. Furthermore, while ZSTK474 was initially effective in melanoma cells with induced resistance to vemurafenib, a subset of these cell lines concurrently developed partial resistance to PI3K inhibition. Importantly, mTOR-selective or mTOR/PI3K dual inhibitors effectively inhibited cell growth in all the lines, including those already resistant to BRAF inhibitors and ZSTK474. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this indicates a high degree of diversity in the way the PI3K pathway is activated in different melanoma cell lines and that mTOR is the most effective point for targeting the growth via the PI3K pathway across all of these cell lines.
BACKGROUND: The PI 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway has been implicated as a target for melanoma therapy. METHODS: Given the high degree of genetic heterogeneity in melanoma, we sought to understand the breadth of variation in PI3K signalling in the large NZM panel of early passage cell lines developed from metastatic melanomas. RESULTS: We find the vast majority of lines show upregulation of this pathway, and this upregulation is achieved by a wide range of mechanisms. Expression of all class-IA PI3K isoforms was readily detected in these cell lines. A range of genetic changes in different components of the PI3K pathway was seen in different lines. Coding variants or amplification were identified in the PIK3CA gene, and amplification of the PK3CG gene was common. Deletions in the PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 regulatory subunits were also relatively common. Notably, no genetic variants were seen in the PIK3CD gene despite p110δ being expressed in many of the lines. Genetic variants were detected in a number of genes that encode phosphatases regulating the PI3K signalling, with reductions in copy number common in PTEN, INPP4B, INPP5J, PHLLP1 and PHLLP2 genes. While the pan-PI3K inhibitor ZSTK474 attenuated cell growth in all the lines tested, isoform-selective inhibition of p110α and p110δ inhibited cell growth in only a subset of the lines and the inhibition was only partial. This suggests that functional redundancy exists between PI3K isoforms. Furthermore, while ZSTK474 was initially effective in melanoma cells with induced resistance to vemurafenib, a subset of these cell lines concurrently developed partial resistance to PI3K inhibition. Importantly, mTOR-selective or mTOR/PI3K dual inhibitors effectively inhibited cell growth in all the lines, including those already resistant to BRAF inhibitors and ZSTK474. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this indicates a high degree of diversity in the way the PI3K pathway is activated in different melanoma cell lines and that mTOR is the most effective point for targeting the growth via the PI3K pathway across all of these cell lines.
Entities:
Keywords:
A66; BEZ-235; Drug resistance; IC 87114; KU-0063794; Melanoma; PI 3-kinase; PI3Kα; PI3Kδ; PIK3CA; PIK3CD; PIK3CG; VPS34; mTOR
Authors: Dirk Schadendorf; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Carola Berking; Klaus G Griewank; Ralf Gutzmer; Axel Hauschild; Andreas Stang; Alexander Roesch; Selma Ugurel Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Axel Hauschild; Jean-Jacques Grob; Lev V Demidov; Thomas Jouary; Ralf Gutzmer; Michael Millward; Piotr Rutkowski; Christian U Blank; Wilson H Miller; Eckhart Kaempgen; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Cornelia Mauch; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Anne-Marie Martin; Suzanne Swann; Patricia Haney; Beloo Mirakhur; Mary E Guckert; Vicki Goodman; Paul B Chapman Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L B Andersen; J W Fountain; D H Gutmann; S A Tarlé; T W Glover; N C Dracopoli; D E Housman; F S Collins Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: James Tsai; John T Lee; Weiru Wang; Jiazhong Zhang; Hanna Cho; Shumeye Mamo; Ryan Bremer; Sam Gillette; Jun Kong; Nikolas K Haass; Katrin Sproesser; Ling Li; Keiran S M Smalley; Daniel Fong; Yong-Liang Zhu; Adhirai Marimuthu; Hoa Nguyen; Billy Lam; Jennifer Liu; Ivana Cheung; Julie Rice; Yoshihisa Suzuki; Catherine Luu; Calvin Settachatgul; Rafe Shellooe; John Cantwell; Sung-Hou Kim; Joseph Schlessinger; Kam Y J Zhang; Brian L West; Ben Powell; Gaston Habets; Chao Zhang; Prabha N Ibrahim; Peter Hirth; Dean R Artis; Meenhard Herlyn; Gideon Bollag Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Julia Reifenberger; Christiane B Knobbe; Astrid A Sterzinger; Britta Blaschke; Klaus W Schulte; Thomas Ruzicka; Guido Reifenberger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2004-04-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Ophélia Maertens; Bryan Johnson; Pablo Hollstein; Dennie T Frederick; Zachary A Cooper; Ludwine Messiaen; Roderick T Bronson; Martin McMahon; Scott Granter; Keith Flaherty; Jennifer A Wargo; Richard Marais; Karen Cichowski Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962