Lauren Dennison1, Aditya A Mohan1, Mark Yarchoan2. 1. The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. 2. The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. mark.yarchoan@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK) is an integral component of the RAS signaling pathway, one of the most frequently mutated pathways in cancer biology. MEK inhibitors were initially developed to directly target oncogenic signaling, but are recognized to have pleiotropic effects on both tumor cells and lymphocytes. Here, we review the preclinical and clinical evidence that MEK inhibition is immunomodulatory and discuss the potential rationale for combining MEK inhibitors with systemic immunotherapies. RECENT FINDINGS: MEK inhibition may modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) through direct effects on both tumor cells and immune cells. Despite encouraging evidence that MEK inhibition can reprogram the tumor microenvironment (TME) and augment anti-tumor immunity regardless of KRAS/BRAF status, recent clinical outcome studies combining MEK inhibition with systemic immunotherapy have yielded mixed results. The combination of MEK inhibitors plus systemic immunotherapies has been tolerable, but has thus far failed to demonstrate clear evidence of synergistic clinical activity. These results underscore the need to understand the appropriate therapeutic context for this combination. MEK inhibitors have the potential to inhibit oncogenic signaling and reprogram the tumor immune microenvironment, representing an attractive therapy to combine with systemic immunotherapies. Ongoing preclinical and clinical studies will further clarify the immunomodulatory effects of MEK inhibitors to inform the design of rational therapeutic combinations.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK) is an integral component of the RAS signaling pathway, one of the most frequently mutated pathways in cancer biology. MEK inhibitors were initially developed to directly target oncogenic signaling, but are recognized to have pleiotropic effects on both tumor cells and lymphocytes. Here, we review the preclinical and clinical evidence that MEK inhibition is immunomodulatory and discuss the potential rationale for combining MEK inhibitors with systemic immunotherapies. RECENT FINDINGS: MEK inhibition may modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) through direct effects on both tumor cells and immune cells. Despite encouraging evidence that MEK inhibition can reprogram the tumor microenvironment (TME) and augment anti-tumor immunity regardless of KRAS/BRAF status, recent clinical outcome studies combining MEK inhibition with systemic immunotherapy have yielded mixed results. The combination of MEK inhibitors plus systemic immunotherapies has been tolerable, but has thus far failed to demonstrate clear evidence of synergistic clinical activity. These results underscore the need to understand the appropriate therapeutic context for this combination. MEK inhibitors have the potential to inhibit oncogenic signaling and reprogram the tumor immune microenvironment, representing an attractive therapy to combine with systemic immunotherapies. Ongoing preclinical and clinical studies will further clarify the immunomodulatory effects of MEK inhibitors to inform the design of rational therapeutic combinations.
Authors: Scott Kopetz; Axel Grothey; Rona Yaeger; Eric Van Cutsem; Jayesh Desai; Takayuki Yoshino; Harpreet Wasan; Fortunato Ciardiello; Fotios Loupakis; Yong Sang Hong; Neeltje Steeghs; Tormod K Guren; Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau; Pilar Garcia-Alfonso; Per Pfeiffer; Sergey Orlov; Sara Lonardi; Elena Elez; Tae-Won Kim; Jan H M Schellens; Christina Guo; Asha Krishnan; Jeroen Dekervel; Van Morris; Aitana Calvo Ferrandiz; L S Tarpgaard; Michael Braun; Ashwin Gollerkeri; Christopher Keir; Kati Maharry; Michael Pickard; Janna Christy-Bittel; Lisa Anderson; Victor Sandor; Josep Tabernero Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ralf Gutzmer; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Helen Gogas; Caroline Robert; Karl Lewis; Svetlana Protsenko; Rodrigo P Pereira; Thomas Eigentler; Piotr Rutkowski; Lev Demidov; Georgy Moiseevich Manikhas; Yibing Yan; Kuan-Chieh Huang; Anne Uyei; Virginia McNally; Grant A McArthur; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mark Yarchoan; Leslie Cope; Amanda N Ruggieri; Robert A Anders; Anne M Noonan; Laura W Goff; Lipika Goyal; Jill Lacy; Daneng Li; Anuj K Patel; Aiwu R He; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Kristen Spencer; Edward J Kim; S Lindsey Davis; Autumn J McRee; Paul R Kunk; Subir Goyal; Yuan Liu; Lauren Dennison; Stephanie Xavier; Aditya A Mohan; Qingfeng Zhu; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Andrew Poklepovic; Helen X Chen; Elad Sharon; Gregory B Lesinski; Nilofer S Azad Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 19.456
Authors: Thomas Yul Avery; Natalie Köhler; Robert Zeiser; Tilman Brummer; Dietrich Alexander Ruess Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 5.738