Literature DB >> 33547537

Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Malignant Potential of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Gulseren Seven1, Gokhan Silahtaroglu2, Koray Kochan1, Ali Tuzun Ince1, Dilek Sema Arici3, Hakan Senturk4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to investigate whether AI via a deep learning algorithm using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) images could predict the malignant potential of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
METHODS: A series of patients who underwent EUS before surgical resection for gastric GISTs were included. A total of 685 images of GISTs from 55 retrospectively included patients were used as the training data set for the AI system. Convolutional neural networks were constructed to build a deep learning model. After applying the synthetic minority oversampling technique, 70% of the generated images were used for AI training and 30% were used to test AI diagnoses. Next, validation was performed using 153 EUS images of 15 patients with GISTs. In addition, conventional EUS features of 55 patients in the training cohort were evaluated to predict the malignant potential of GISTs and mitotic index.
RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the AI system for predicting malignancy risk were 83%, 94%, and 82% in the training dataset, and 75%, 73%, and 66% in the validation cohort, respectively. When patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy increased to 99% in the training dataset and 99.7%, 99.7%, and 99.6%, respectively, in the validation cohort. No conventional EUS features were found to be associated with either malignant potential or mitotic index (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: AI via a deep learning algorithm using EUS images could predict the malignant potential of gastric GISTs with high accuracy.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Mitotic index; Risk classification

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33547537     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06830-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  30 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-12

2.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Leslie H Sobin; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Hala Makhlouf; Leslie H Sobin; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope.

Authors:  Alberto Larghi; Lorenzo Fuccio; Gaia Chiarello; Fabia Attili; Giuseppe Vanella; Giovanni Battista Paliani; Matteo Napoleone; Guido Rindi; Luigi Maria Larocca; Guido Costamagna; Riccardo Ricci
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 6.  Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population-based cohort studies.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Oddvar M Sandvik; Jon Arne Søreide; Vanja Giljaca; Andrea Jureckova; V Ramesh Bulusu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach.

Authors:  Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut [corrected] biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Polkowski; W Gerke; D Jarosz; A Nasierowska-Guttmejer; P Rutkowski; Z I Nowecki; W Ruka; J Regula; E Butruk
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  The role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA in the management of subepithelial lesions of the esophagus: A large, single-center experience.

Authors:  Birol Baysal; Omar A Masri; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Hakan Senturk
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Binglan Zhang; Fuping Zhu; Pan Li; Jing Zhu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Differentiating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors from Leiomyomas Using a Neural Network Trained on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images.

Authors:  Gulseren Seven; Gokhan Silahtaroglu; Ozden Ozluk Seven; Hakan Senturk
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Popular deep learning algorithms for disease prediction: a review.

Authors:  Zengchen Yu; Ke Wang; Zhibo Wan; Shuxuan Xie; Zhihan Lv
Journal:  Cluster Comput       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions using endoscopic ultrasonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Yuan Liu; Wen Song; Tao Mao; Qi Zhang; Cuiping Zhang; Xiao-Yu Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.