Binglan Zhang1, Fuping Zhu2, Pan Li1, Jing Zhu3. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. 2. Department of General Surgery, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China. 3. Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. 22118731@qq.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is useful for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but is limited by subjective interpretation. Studies on artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis are under development. Here, we used a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI in the diagnosis of GISTs using EUS images. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies based on the EUS using AI for the diagnosis of GISTs, and a meta-analysis was performed to examine the accuracy. RESULTS: Overall, 7 studies were included in our meta-analysis. A total of 2431 patients containing more than 36,186 images were used as the overall dataset, of which 480 patients were used for the final testing. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratio (LR) of AI-assisted EUS for differentiating GISTs from other submucosal tumors (SMTs) were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.95), 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.87), 4.55 (95% CI 2.64-7.84), and 0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.20), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the curve were 64.70 (95% CI 23.83-175.69) and 0.950 (Q* = 0.891). CONCLUSIONS: AI-assisted EUS showed high accuracy for the automatic endoscopic diagnosis of GISTs, which could be used as a valuable complementary method for the differentiation of SMTs in the future.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is useful for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but is limited by subjective interpretation. Studies on artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis are under development. Here, we used a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI in the diagnosis of GISTs using EUS images. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies based on the EUS using AI for the diagnosis of GISTs, and a meta-analysis was performed to examine the accuracy. RESULTS: Overall, 7 studies were included in our meta-analysis. A total of 2431 patients containing more than 36,186 images were used as the overall dataset, of which 480 patients were used for the final testing. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratio (LR) of AI-assisted EUS for differentiating GISTs from other submucosal tumors (SMTs) were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.95), 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.87), 4.55 (95% CI 2.64-7.84), and 0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.20), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the curve were 64.70 (95% CI 23.83-175.69) and 0.950 (Q* = 0.891). CONCLUSIONS: AI-assisted EUS showed high accuracy for the automatic endoscopic diagnosis of GISTs, which could be used as a valuable complementary method for the differentiation of SMTs in the future.
Authors: Cetin Karaca; Brian G Turner; Sevdenur Cizginer; David Forcione; William Brugge Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Joo Ha Hwang; Michael D Saunders; Stephen J Rulyak; Steve Shaw; Hubert Nietsch; Michael B Kimmey Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: A Chak; M I Canto; T Rösch; H J Dittler; R H Hawes; T L Tio; C J Lightdale; H W Boyce; J Scheiman; S L Carpenter; J Van Dam; M L Kochman; M V Sivak Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Jung Hoon Lee; Hang Lak Lee; Yong Woo Ahn; Kang Nyeong Lee; Dae Won Jun; Oh Young Lee; Dong Soo Han; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi Journal: Korean J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-11