Literature DB >> 33547518

Use of population input functions for reduced scan duration whole-body Patlak 18F-FDG PET imaging.

Joyce van Sluis1, Maqsood Yaqub2, Adrienne H Brouwers3, Rudi A J O Dierckx3, Walter Noordzij3, Ronald Boellaard3,2.   

Abstract

Whole-body Patlak images can be obtained from an acquisition of first 6 min of dynamic imaging over the heart to obtain the arterial input function (IF), followed by multiple whole-body sweeps up to 60 min pi. The use of a population-averaged IF (PIF) could exclude the first dynamic scan and minimize whole-body sweeps to 30-60 min pi. Here, the effects of (incorrect) PIFs on the accuracy of the proposed Patlak method were assessed. In addition, the extent of mitigating these biases through rescaling of the PIF to image-derived IF values at 30-60 min pi was evaluated.
METHODS: Using a representative IF and rate constants from the literature, various tumour time-activity curves (TACs) were simulated. Variations included multiplication of the IF with a positive and negative gradual linear bias over 60 min of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% (generating TACs using an IF different from the PIF); use of rate constants (K1, k3, and both K1 and k2) multiplied by 2, 1.5, and 0.75; and addition of noise (μ = 0 and σ = 5, 10 and 15%). Subsequent Patlak analysis using the original IF (representing the PIF) was used to obtain the influx constant (Ki) for the differently simulated TACs. Next, the PIF was scaled towards the (simulated) IF value using the 30-60-min pi time interval, simulating scaling of the PIF to image-derived values. Influence of variabilities in IF and rate constants, and rescaling the PIF on bias in Ki was evaluated.
RESULTS: Percentage bias in Ki observed using simulated modified IFs varied from - 16 to 16% depending on the simulated amplitude and direction of the IF modifications. Subsequent scaling of the PIF reduced these Ki biases in most cases (287 out of 290) to < 5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulations suggest that scaling of a (possibly incorrect) PIF to IF values seen in whole-body dynamic imaging from 30 to 60 min pi can provide accurate Ki estimates. Consequently, dynamic Patlak imaging protocols may be performed for 30-60 min pi making whole-body Patlak imaging clinically feasible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic imaging; PET/CT; Patlak; Population input function; Scan time

Year:  2021        PMID: 33547518      PMCID: PMC7865035          DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00357-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Phys        ISSN: 2197-7364


  33 in total

1.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value.

Authors:  S C Huang
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 2.  How should we analyse FDG PET studies for monitoring tumour response?

Authors:  Adriaan A Lammertsma; Corneline J Hoekstra; Giuseppe Giaccone; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials.

Authors:  Lalitha K Shankar; John M Hoffman; Steve Bacharach; Michael M Graham; Joel Karp; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Steven Larson; David A Mankoff; Barry A Siegel; Annick Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey Yap; Daniel Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Dual-modality imaging: combining anatomy and function.

Authors:  David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  A curve-fitting approach to estimate the arterial plasma input function for the assessment of glucose metabolic rate and response to treatment.

Authors:  Dennis Vriens; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Wim J G Oyen; Eric P Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Quantitative assessment of heterogeneity in tumor metabolism using FDG-PET.

Authors:  Dennis Vriens; Jonathan A Disselhorst; Wim J G Oyen; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Eric P Visser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET.

Authors:  Norbert E Avril; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Generalized whole-body Patlak parametric imaging for enhanced quantification in clinical PET.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Yun Zhou; Martin A Lodge; Michael E Casey; Richard L Wahl; Habib Zaidi; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Measuring response to therapy using FDG PET: semi-quantitative and full kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Patsuree Cheebsumon; Linda M Velasquez; Corneline J Hoekstra; Wendy Hayes; Reina W Kloet; Nikie J Hoetjes; Egbert F Smit; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Assessment of population-based input functions for Patlak imaging of whole body dynamic 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Mika Naganawa; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Vijay Shah; Tim Mulnix; Colin Young; Mark Dias; Ming-Kai Chen; Anne M Smith; Richard E Carson
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-11-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimal imaging time points considering accuracy and precision of Patlak linearization for 89Zr-immuno-PET: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jessica E Wijngaarden; Marc C Huisman; Johanna E E Pouw; C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Yvonne W S Jauw; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.434

2.  Clinical validation of a population-based input function for 20-min dynamic whole-body 18F-FDG multiparametric PET imaging.

Authors:  André H Dias; Anne M Smith; Vijay Shah; David Pigg; Lars C Gormsen; Ole L Munk
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-08

3.  Comparison between a dual-time-window protocol and other simplified protocols for dynamic total-body 18F-FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  Zhenguo Wang; Yaping Wu; Xiaochen Li; Yan Bai; Hongzhao Chen; Jie Ding; Chushu Shen; Zhanli Hu; Dong Liang; Xin Liu; Hairong Zheng; Yongfeng Yang; Yun Zhou; Meiyun Wang; Tao Sun
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-14

4.  Short-time-window Patlak imaging using a population-based arterial input function and optimized Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Takato Tanaka; Masatoyo Nakajo; Hirofumi Kawakami; Eriko Motomura; Tomofumi Fujisaka; Satoko Ojima; Yasumasa Saigo; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Whole-Body Parametric Imaging of 18F-FDG PET Using uEXPLORER with Reduced Scanning Time.

Authors:  Yaping Wu; Tao Feng; Yizhang Zhao; Tianyi Xu; Fangfang Fu; Zhun Huang; Nan Meng; Hongdi Li; Fengmin Shao; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.