Maobin Yang1, Asad Chaghtai2, Marc Melendez2, Hana Hasson3, Eugene Whitaker3, Mustafa Badi4, Leona Sperrazza4, Jeffrey Godel5, Cemil Yesilsoy6, Marisol Tellez7, Santiago Orrego7, Carolina Montoya7, Amid Ismail8. 1. Department of Endodontology, Maurice H Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. myang@temple.edu. 2. Environmental Health and Radiation Safety, Temple University Health Sciences Center, Philadelphia, USA. 3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Maurice H Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Medicine and Surgery, Maurice H Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. 5. Department of Orthodontics, Maurice H Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. 6. Department of Endodontology, Maurice H Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. 7. Department of Oral Health Sciences, Maurice H Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. 8. Maurice H Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transmission of COVID-19 via salivary aerosol particles generated when using handpieces or ultrasonic scalers is a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the spread of dental aerosols on patients and dental providers during aerosol-generating dental procedures. METHODS: This pilot study was conducted with one volunteer. A dental unit used at the dental school for general dental care was the site of the experiment. Before the study, three measurement meters (DustTrak 8534, PTrak 8525 and AeroTrak 9306) were used to measure the ambient distribution of particles in the ambient air surrounding the dental chair. The volunteer wore a bouffant, goggles, and shoe covers and was seated in the dental chair in supine position, and covered with a surgical drape. The dentist and dental assistant donned bouffant, goggles, face shields, N95 masks, surgical gowns and shoe covers. The simulation was conducted by using a high-speed handpiece with a diamond bur operating in the oral cavity for 6 min without touching the teeth. A new set of measurement was obtained while using an ultrasonic scaler to clean all teeth of the volunteer. For both aerosol generating procedures, the aerosol particles were measured with the use of saliva ejector (SE) and high-speed suction (HSS) followed a separate set of measurement with the additional use of an extra oral high-volume suction (HVS) unit that was placed close to the mouth to capture the aerosol in addition to SE and HSS. The distribution of the air particles, including the size and concentration of aerosols, was measured around the patient, dentist, dental assistant, 3 feet above the patient, and the floor. RESULTS: Four locations were identified with elevated aerosol levels compared to the baseline, including the chest of the dentist, the chest of patient, the chest of assistant and 3 feet above the patient. The use of additional extra oral high volume suction reduced aerosol to or below the baseline level. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of the level of aerosol with size less than 10 µm was minimal during dental procedures when using SE and HSS. Use of HVS further reduced aerosol levels below the ambient levels.
BACKGROUND: Transmission of COVID-19 via salivary aerosol particles generated when using handpieces or ultrasonic scalers is a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the spread of dental aerosols on patients and dental providers during aerosol-generating dental procedures. METHODS: This pilot study was conducted with one volunteer. A dental unit used at the dental school for general dental care was the site of the experiment. Before the study, three measurement meters (DustTrak 8534, PTrak 8525 and AeroTrak 9306) were used to measure the ambient distribution of particles in the ambient air surrounding the dental chair. The volunteer wore a bouffant, goggles, and shoe covers and was seated in the dental chair in supine position, and covered with a surgical drape. The dentist and dental assistant donned bouffant, goggles, face shields, N95 masks, surgical gowns and shoe covers. The simulation was conducted by using a high-speed handpiece with a diamond bur operating in the oral cavity for 6 min without touching the teeth. A new set of measurement was obtained while using an ultrasonic scaler to clean all teeth of the volunteer. For both aerosol generating procedures, the aerosol particles were measured with the use of saliva ejector (SE) and high-speed suction (HSS) followed a separate set of measurement with the additional use of an extra oral high-volume suction (HVS) unit that was placed close to the mouth to capture the aerosol in addition to SE and HSS. The distribution of the air particles, including the size and concentration of aerosols, was measured around the patient, dentist, dental assistant, 3 feet above the patient, and the floor. RESULTS: Four locations were identified with elevated aerosol levels compared to the baseline, including the chest of the dentist, the chest of patient, the chest of assistant and 3 feet above the patient. The use of additional extra oral high volume suction reduced aerosol to or below the baseline level. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of the level of aerosol with size less than 10 µm was minimal during dental procedures when using SE and HSS. Use of HVS further reduced aerosol levels below the ambient levels.
Authors: H R Veena; S Mahantesha; Preethi A Joseph; Sudhir R Patil; Suvarna H Patil Journal: J Infect Public Health Date: 2015-01-03 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Yu-Jue Hong; Yen-Ching Huang; I-Long Lee; Che-Ming Chiang; Chitsan Lin; Hueiwang Anna Jeng Journal: J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng Date: 2015 Impact factor: 2.269
Authors: Jeong-Min Kim; Yoon-Seok Chung; Hye Jun Jo; Nam-Joo Lee; Mi Seon Kim; Sang Hee Woo; Sehee Park; Jee Woong Kim; Heui Man Kim; Myung-Guk Han Journal: Osong Public Health Res Perspect Date: 2020-02
Authors: Dorottya Gheorghita; Fruzsina Kun Szabó; Tibor Ajtai; Szabolcs Hodovány; Zoltán Bozóki; Gábor Braunitzer; Márk Ádám Antal Journal: Int Dent J Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 2.607
Authors: Paula Alejandra Baldion; Henry Oliveros Rodríguez; Camilo Alejandro Guerrero; Alberto Carlos Cruz; Diego Enrique Betancourt Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2021-12-30
Authors: Florentina Melzow; Sarah Mertens; Hristo Todorov; David A Groneberg; Sebastian Paris; Alexander Gerber Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Nicolai Oetter; Tobias Möst; Manuel Weber; Mayte Buchbender; Maximilian Rohde; Yannick Foerster; Charlotte Bauerschmitz; Nico Röschmann; Werner Adler; Andrea Rau; Marion Meyerolbersleben; Marco Kesting; Rainer Lutz Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Tom Dudding; Sadiyah Sheikh; Florence Gregson; Jennifer Haworth; Simon Haworth; Barry G Main; Andrew J Shrimpton; Fergus W Hamilton; Anthony J Ireland; Nick A Maskell; Jonathan P Reid; Bryan R Bzdek; Mark Gormley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240