Fiona Marshall1,2,3, Adam Gordon4,5,6,7, John R F Gladman4,5,7,8, Simon Bishop9. 1. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK. Fiona.marshall2@nottingham.ac.uk. 2. School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Fiona.marshall2@nottingham.ac.uk. 3. Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, Derby Medical School, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK. Fiona.marshall2@nottingham.ac.uk. 4. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK. 5. School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 6. University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK. 7. NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham, UK. 8. Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. 9. Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: From late February 2020, English care homes rapidly adapted their practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to accommodating new guidelines and policies, staff had to adjust to rapid reconfiguration of services external to the home that they would normally depend upon for support. This study examined the complex interdependencies of support as staff responded to COVID-19. The aim was to inform more effective responses to the ongoing pandemic, and to improve understanding of how to work with care home staff and organisations after the pandemic has passed. METHODS: Ten managers of registered care homes in the East Midlands of England were interviewed by videoconference or phone about their experiences of the crisis from a structured organisational perspective. Analysis used an adapted organisational framework analysis approach with a focus on social ties and interdependencies between organisations and individuals. RESULTS: Three key groups of interdependencies were identified: care processes and practice; resources; and governance. Care home staff had to deliver care in innovative ways, making high stakes decisions in circumstances defined by: fluid ties to organisations outside the care home; multiple, sometimes conflicting, sources of expertise and information; and a sense of deprioritisation by authorities. Organisational responses to the pandemic by central government resulted in resource constraints and additional work, and sometimes impaired the ability of staff and managers to make decisions. Local communities, including businesses, third-sector organisations and individuals, were key in helping care homes overcome challenges. Care homes, rather than competing, were found to work together to provide mutual support. Resilience in the system was a consequence of dedicated and resourceful staff using existing local networks, or forging new ones, to overcome barriers to care. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified how interdependency between care home organisations, the surrounding community, and key statutory and non-statutory organisations beyond their locality, shaped decision making and care delivery during the pandemic. Recognising these interdependencies, and the expertise shown by care home managers and staff as they navigate them, is key to providing effective healthcare in care homes as the pandemic progresses, and as the sector recovers afterwards.
BACKGROUND: From late February 2020, English care homes rapidly adapted their practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to accommodating new guidelines and policies, staff had to adjust to rapid reconfiguration of services external to the home that they would normally depend upon for support. This study examined the complex interdependencies of support as staff responded to COVID-19. The aim was to inform more effective responses to the ongoing pandemic, and to improve understanding of how to work with care home staff and organisations after the pandemic has passed. METHODS: Ten managers of registered care homes in the East Midlands of England were interviewed by videoconference or phone about their experiences of the crisis from a structured organisational perspective. Analysis used an adapted organisational framework analysis approach with a focus on social ties and interdependencies between organisations and individuals. RESULTS: Three key groups of interdependencies were identified: care processes and practice; resources; and governance. Care home staff had to deliver care in innovative ways, making high stakes decisions in circumstances defined by: fluid ties to organisations outside the care home; multiple, sometimes conflicting, sources of expertise and information; and a sense of deprioritisation by authorities. Organisational responses to the pandemic by central government resulted in resource constraints and additional work, and sometimes impaired the ability of staff and managers to make decisions. Local communities, including businesses, third-sector organisations and individuals, were key in helping care homes overcome challenges. Care homes, rather than competing, were found to work together to provide mutual support. Resilience in the system was a consequence of dedicated and resourceful staff using existing local networks, or forging new ones, to overcome barriers to care. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified how interdependency between care home organisations, the surrounding community, and key statutory and non-statutory organisations beyond their locality, shaped decision making and care delivery during the pandemic. Recognising these interdependencies, and the expertise shown by care home managers and staff as they navigate them, is key to providing effective healthcare in care homes as the pandemic progresses, and as the sector recovers afterwards.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Homes for the aged; Interdependencies; Knowledge sharing; Organisational healthcare
Authors: Adam L Gordon; Claire Goodman; Wilco Achterberg; Robert O Barker; Eileen Burns; Barbara Hanratty; Finbarr C Martin; Julienne Meyer; Desmond O'Neill; Jos Schols; Karen Spilsbury Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Adam L Gordon; Claire Goodman; Sue L Davies; Tom Dening; Heather Gage; Julienne Meyer; Justine Schneider; Brian Bell; Jake Jordan; Finbarr C Martin; Steve Iliffe; Clive Bowman; John R F Gladman; Christina Victor; Andrea Mayrhofer; Melanie Handley; Maria Zubair Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Neil H Chadborn; Claire Goodman; Maria Zubair; Lídia Sousa; John R F Gladman; Tom Dening; Adam L Gordon Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Adam Lee Gordon; Matthew Franklin; Lucy Bradshaw; Pip Logan; Rachel Elliott; John R F Gladman Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Reena Devi; Graham Martin; Jay Banerjee; Louise Butler; Tim Pattison; Lesley Cruickshank; Caroline Maries-Tillott; Tracie Wilson; Sarah Damery; Julienne Meyer; Antonius Poot; Peter Chamberlain; Debbie Harvey; Clarissa Giebel; Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith; Neil Chadborn; Adam Lee Gordon Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Susan D Shenkin; Adam L Gordon; Lucy Johnston; Cheryl Henderson; Wilco P Achterberg Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Agneta Malmgren Fänge; Jonas Christensen; Tamara Backhouse; Andrea Kenkmann; Anne Killett; Oliver Fisher; Carlos Chiatti; Connie Lethin Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-02-05
Authors: Amber Savage; Sandra Young; Heather K Titley; Trina E Thorne; Jude Spiers; Carole A Estabrooks Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Sarah Sims; Ruth Harris; Shereen Hussein; Anne Marie Rafferty; Amit Desai; Sinead Palmer; Sally Brearley; Richard Adams; Lindsay Rees; Joanne M Fitzpatrick Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390