Literature DB >> 33546598

Coupled mixed model for joint genetic analysis of complex disorders with two independently collected data sets.

Haohan Wang1, Fen Pei2, Michael M Vanyukov3, Ivet Bahar2, Wei Wu4, Eric P Xing5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, Genome-wide Association studies (GWASs) have contributed to decoding the human genome by uncovering many genetic variations associated with various diseases. Many follow-up investigations involve joint analysis of multiple independently generated GWAS data sets. While most of the computational approaches developed for joint analysis are based on summary statistics, the joint analysis based on individual-level data with consideration of confounding factors remains to be a challenge.
RESULTS: In this study, we propose a method, called Coupled Mixed Model (CMM), that enables a joint GWAS analysis on two independently collected sets of GWAS data with different phenotypes. The CMM method does not require the data sets to have the same phenotypes as it aims to infer the unknown phenotypes using a set of multivariate sparse mixed models. Moreover, CMM addresses the confounding variables due to population stratification, family structures, and cryptic relatedness, as well as those arising during data collection such as batch effects that frequently appear in joint genetic studies. We evaluate the performance of CMM using simulation experiments. In real data analysis, we illustrate the utility of CMM by an application to evaluating common genetic associations for Alzheimer's disease and substance use disorder using datasets independently collected for the two complex human disorders. Comparison of the results with those from previous experiments and analyses supports the utility of our method and provides new insights into the diseases. The software is available at https://github.com/HaohanWang/CMM .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deconfounding; Joint analysis; Mixed model

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33546598      PMCID: PMC7866684          DOI: 10.1186/s12859-021-03959-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  55 in total

1.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Meta-analysis of correlated traits via summary statistics from GWASs with an application in hypertension.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhu; Tao Feng; Bamidele O Tayo; Jingjing Liang; J Hunter Young; Nora Franceschini; Jennifer A Smith; Lisa R Yanek; Yan V Sun; Todd L Edwards; Wei Chen; Mike Nalls; Ervin Fox; Michele Sale; Erwin Bottinger; Charles Rotimi; Yongmei Liu; Barbara McKnight; Kiang Liu; Donna K Arnett; Aravinda Chakravati; Richard S Cooper; Susan Redline
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Epidemiology of DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions III.

Authors:  Bridget F Grant; Risë B Goldstein; Tulshi D Saha; S Patricia Chou; Jeesun Jung; Haitao Zhang; Roger P Pickering; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Boji Huang; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  A time-varying group sparse additive model for genome-wide association studies of dynamic complex traits.

Authors:  Micol Marchetti-Bowick; Junming Yin; Judie A Howrylak; Eric P Xing
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Zhiwu Zhang; Elhan Ersoz; Chao-Qiang Lai; Rory J Todhunter; Hemant K Tiwari; Michael A Gore; Peter J Bradbury; Jianming Yu; Donna K Arnett; Jose M Ordovas; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Emerging role of CaMKII in neuropsychiatric disease.

Authors:  A J Robison
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Imputing Phenotypes for Genome-wide Association Studies.

Authors:  Farhad Hormozdiari; Eun Yong Kang; Michael Bilow; Eyal Ben-David; Chris Vulpe; Stela McLachlan; Aldons J Lusis; Buhm Han; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Joint GWAS Analysis: Comparing similar GWAS at different genomic resolutions identifies novel pathway associations with six complex diseases.

Authors:  Michael J McGeachie; George L Clemmer; Jessica Lasky-Su; Amber Dahlin; Benjamin A Raby; Scott T Weiss
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2014-12-01

9.  Multikernel linear mixed models for complex phenotype prediction.

Authors:  Omer Weissbrod; Dan Geiger; Saharon Rosset
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Joint modeling of genetically correlated diseases and functional annotations increases accuracy of polygenic risk prediction.

Authors:  Yiming Hu; Qiongshi Lu; Wei Liu; Yuhua Zhang; Mo Li; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.