| Literature DB >> 33544801 |
Florica Bărbuceanu1, Elena Valentina Roşca, Theodora Venera Apostol, Oana Cristina Şeremet, Constantin Drăghici, Dragoş Paul Mihai, Simona Negreş, George Mihai Niţulescu, Ştefania Felicia Bărbuceanu.
Abstract
This paper reports the syntEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33544801 PMCID: PMC7864298 DOI: 10.47162/RJME.61.2.19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rom J Morphol Embryol ISSN: 1220-0522 Impact factor: 1.033
Figure 1Benzylidene-oxazolones (I), (II) and (III) with analgesic/anti-inflammatory activity
Figure 2The new 2-(4-(4-bromophenylsulfonyl)phenyl)-4-arylidene-oxazol-5(4H)-ones 2a–d synthesis
Figure 3Average change in body weight (b.w.) of animals treated by gavage, with the tested substances: (A) Stage I, 300 mg/kg b.w.; (B) Stage II, 2000 mg/kg b.w.
Figure 4Cerebellum. Normal appearance of the topohistological elements which form the cerebellar hemispheres. Mouse treated with compound 2a. HE staining, ×40
Figure 5Heart. Normal aspects of cardiomyocytes in the left ventricle. Mouse treated with compound 2b. HE staining, ×200.
Figure 6Kidneys. Normal aspects of the proximal renal tubules; hyperemia in the mesangial and interstitial capillaries. Similar aspects with control group and compound 2a. Mouse treated with compound 2b. HE staining, ×200
Figure 7Lungs. Histological modifications similar to the control group and compounds 2a, 2b and 2c; hyperemia and microhemorrhages in the interstitial areas and in the interalveolar spaces. Mouse treated with compound 2d. HE staining, ×100
Figure 8Spleen. Lymphoid tissue well represented in the lymphocyte sheaths and in the paracortical areas. No toxic changes. Mouse treated with compound 2c. HE staining, ×200
Figure 9Liver. Capillaries and venules with peri-vascular lymphoid infiltrations; hepatocyte vacuolar degeneration of higher intensity compared to control group and compounds 2a, 2b and 2c. Mouse treated with compound 2d. HE staining, ×100
Acetic acid-induced writhing test: analgesic effect [%] vs. control group for the tested compounds 2a–d
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
34.3±11.24 |
– |
|
Diclofenac sodium |
11.9±10.44 |
-65.31*** |
|
2a |
26.1±9.05 |
-23.91 |
|
2b |
19.9±10.99 |
-41.98* |
|
2c |
25.2±12.96 |
-26.53 |
|
2d |
32.4±7.3 |
-5.54 |
M: Mean; SD: Standard deviation; *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 – Student’s t-test
Hot plate test: analgesic effect [%] vs. initial for the tested compounds 2a–d
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
10.35±2.41 |
9.94±2.73 |
-3.96 |
|
Diclofenac sodium |
10.06±2.66 |
12.55±4.62 |
24.75 |
|
Tramadol hydrochloride |
10.01±2.71 |
14.24±3.25 |
42.29*** |
|
2a |
10.11±2.85 |
12.07±3.21 |
19.39 |
|
2b |
10.19±3.55 |
10.26±2.94 |
0.69 |
|
2c |
10.17±2.55 |
9.88±1.88 |
-2.84 |
|
2d |
10.39±1.52 |
10.22±3.06 |
-1.6 |
M: Mean; SD: Standard deviation; ***p<0.001 – Student’s t-test
Molecular docking results expressed as binding energies for compounds 2a–d and positive controls
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2a |
-8.6 |
-3.4 |
-8.8 |
-9.3 |
|
2b |
-8.1 |
-3.6 |
-8.6 |
-9.6 |
|
2c |
-8.5 |
-3.7 |
-8.6 |
-9.6 |
|
2d |
-8.1 |
-3.1 |
-8.4 |
-9.3 |
|
Mofezolac |
-7.5 |
– |
– |
– |
|
Celecoxib |
– |
-12 |
– |
– |
|
HC-030031 |
– |
– |
-7.4 |
– |
|
A-967079 |
– |
– |
-8.1 |
– |
|
Capsazepine |
– |
– |
– |
-7.8 |
COX-1: Cyclooxygenase-1; COX-2: Cyclooxygenase-2; TRPA1: Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily A, member 1; TRPV1: Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1
Figure 10Three-dimensional docked conformation of the protein–ligand complex (A) and two-dimensional depiction of molecular interactions between compound 2b and TRPA1 crystal structure (B). TRPA1: Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily A, member 1
Figure 11Three-dimensional docked conformation of the protein-ligand complex (A) and two-dimensional depiction of molecular interactions between compound 2b and TRPV1 crystal structure (B). TRPV1: Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1