| Literature DB >> 33543592 |
Seyed Elyas Meshkani1, Akram Kooshki2, Ahmad Alahabadi3, Moslem Lari Najafi4, Abolfazl Rad1, Forough Riahimanesh1, Mohammad Miri3.
Abstract
Telomere length (TL) has been associated with lifestyle and dietary pattern. However, the available evidence on this association in children is scarce, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association of dietary pattern and leukocyte TL (LTL) in preschool children, Sabzevar, Iran (2017). This cross-sectional study was based on 187 preschool children (aged 5 to 7) recruited from 27 kindergartens. Nutrition information including amounts of consumed dairy products, meat and processed meat products, nuts and seeds, white bread and refined grains, fruits, vegetables, simple sugars, fats and drinks was obtained through a questionnaire. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) plate ID and kindergartens as random effects to estimate the association of each food group consumption with LTL, controlled for relevant covariates. Higher consumption of dairy products and sugar was associated with shorter LTL (β = -0.180, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.276, -0.085, P value <0.001 and β = -0.139, 95% CI: -0.193, -0.086, P value <0.001, respectively). An increase in consumption of fish, nuts and seeds, coloured fruits, green leafy vegetables, cruciferous vegetables and olive was significantly associated with the increase in relative LTL. The associations for the consumption of legumes, other fruits, yellow and orange vegetables, red meat, egg, white bread and refined grains, solid and liquid fats, processed meats, potato chips, carbonated drinks, tea (black) and soft drinks groups were not statistically significant. Our findings showed that there was an association between the consumption of certain food groups with LTL.Entities:
Keywords: ageing; food groups; preschool children; telomere length
Year: 2021 PMID: 33543592 PMCID: PMC8189250 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
FIGURE 1Flow chart for the inclusion of participants in the study
Descriptive statistics of demographic information, socio‐economic status and TL of subjects
| Variables |
| In study year |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 183 (1) | 6.40 ± 0.78 |
| Sex | 184 | |
| Female, | 106 (57.60) | |
| Male, | 78 (42.40) | |
| BMI (kg m−2), mean ± SD | 168 (16) | 15.26 ± 3.26 |
|
| 184 | |
| No education/primary school, | 64 (34.80) | |
| Secondary school education, | 104 (56.50) | |
| University degree or higher, | 16 (8.70) | |
|
| 184 | |
| No education/primary school, | 71 (38.60) | |
| Secondary school education, | 89 (48.40) | |
| University degree or higher, | 24 (13) | |
|
| 181 (3) | |
| ≥15 million rials, | 161 (86.50) | |
| 15 to 30 million rials, | 19 (10.30) | |
| ≤30 million rials, | 1 (0.50) | |
| Tobacco exposure at home, | 183 (1) | 24 (13) |
| Illiterate per cent per census tract (%), median (first Q to the third Q) | 184 | 25.67 (7.00–35.01) |
| Unemployed per cent per census tract (%), median (first Q to third Q) | 184 | 7.00 (2.98–10.78) |
|
| 184 | |
| Overall | 0.84 (0.52–1.23) | |
| Female | 0.88 (0.54–1.25) | |
| Male | 0.78 (0.47–1.16) |
Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD, N (%) and median (first Q to the third Q).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; Q, quartile; SD, standard deviation.
Number of available observations.
Linear mixed‐effects model for the consumption of foods and consequent effects on TL of subjects
| Food groups |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dairy products | Model 1 | −0.198 (−0.276, −0.120) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | −0.180 (−0.276, −0.085) | <0.001 | |
| Red meat | Model 1 | −0.060 (−0.134, 0.012) | 0.103 |
| Model 2 | −0.044 (−0.130, 0.421) | 0.314 | |
| Fish | Model 1 | 0.215 (0.161, 0.270) | 0.000 |
| Model 2 | 0.208 (0.144, 0.272) | 0.001 | |
| Nuts and seeds | Model 1 | 0.130 (0.075, 0.185) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.105 (0.041, 0.168) | 0.001 | |
| Egg | Model 1 | −0.006 (−0.098, 0.086) | 0.898 |
| Model 2 | 0.008 (−0.111, 0.127) | 0.894 | |
| Legumes | Model 1 | 0.198 (−0.058, 0.097) | 0.626 |
| Model 2 | 0.004 (−0.086, 0.097) | 0.930 | |
| White bread and refined grains | Model 1 | −0.128 (−0.274, 0.017) | 0.083 |
| Model 2 | −0.958 (−0.249, 0.057) | 0.219 | |
| Coloured fruits | Model 1 | 0.092 (0.030, 0.155) | 0.004 |
| Model 2 | 0.115 (0.047, 0.183) | 0.001 | |
| Other fruits | Model 1 | 0.062 (0.010, 0.114) | 0.190 |
| Model 2 | 0.076 (0.019, 0.134) | 0.009 | |
| Yellow and orange vegetables | Model 1 | 0.080 (0.019, 0.140) | 0.010 |
| Model 2 | 0.093 (0.020, 0.166) | 0.012 | |
| Green leafy vegetables | Model 1 | 0.090 (0.036, 0.143) | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.098 (0.037, 0.159) | 0.002 | |
| Cruciferous vegetables | Model 1 | 0.128 (0.071, 0.179) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.126 (0.067, 0.184) | <0.001 | |
| Simple sugar | Model 1 | −0.132 (−0.178, −0.086) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | −0.139 (−0.193, −0.086) | <0.001 | |
| Solid and liquid fats | Model 1 | −0.047 (−0.104, 0.010) | 0.110 |
| Model 2 | −0.040 (−0.105, .024) | 0.219 | |
| Processed meats | Model 1 | −0.047 (−0.146, 0.054) | 0.366 |
| Model 2 | −0.033 (−0.156, 0.088) | 0.585 | |
| Potato chips | Model 1 | −0.032 (−0.094, 0.030) | 0.310 |
| Model 2 | −0.055 (−0.126, 0.014) | 0.121 | |
| Carbonated drinks | Model 1 | −0.012 (−0.070, 0.045) | 0.677 |
| Model 2 | −0.027 (−0.098, 0.042) | 0.435 | |
| Tea (black) | Model 1 | −0.020 (−0.068, 0.028) | 0.416 |
| Model 2 | −0.012 (−0.071, 0.045) | 0.667 | |
| Soft drinks | Model 1 | −0.009 (0.063, 0.044) | 0.723 |
| Model 2 | 0.017 (−0.044, 0.080) | 0.573 | |
| Olive | Model 1 | 0.172 (0.120, 0.224) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.165 (0.108, 0.224) | <0.001 |
Note: Model 1: crude (not adjusted) model. Model 2: this model is adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, paternal and maternal education level, income, tobacco smoke exposure at home, illiterate per cent per census tract and unemployed per cent per census tract. Polymerase chain reaction plates and kindergarten were considered as a random effect in all analyses.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; TL, telomere length.