Literature DB >> 33543320

Bone lesions on baseline staging rectal MRI: prevalence and significance in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Jeffrey Levine1,2, Iva Petkovska3, Jonathan Landa3, David D B Bates3, Marinela Capanu4, J Louis Fuqua3, Viktoriya Paroder3, Junting Zheng4, Marc J Gollub3, Jennifer S Golia Pernicka3.   

Abstract

A T1 sequence on routine baseline staging rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is thought to help detect bone lesions. Our primary aim was to evaluate the incidence of bone lesions encountered on baseline staging rectal MRI, particularly the prevalence of bone metastases. This retrospective study included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent baseline rectal MRI at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. The MRI report was reviewed for presence of bone lesions. When found, lesion type, presence of axial T1 non-fat-suppressed sequence, primary tumor T-stage, and presence of other organ metastases were recorded. In the absence of bone biopsy, the reference standard was follow-up imaging via computed tomography (CT), MRI, and/or positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) ≥ 1 year after the baseline MRI. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare clinicopathologic data of patients with malignant or benign bone lesions. A total of 1197 patients were included. 62/1197 patients (mean age 56.8 years (SD: 13.8), with 39 men) had bone lesions on baseline imaging, with 6 being bone metastases (0.5%, 95% CI 0.2%-1.1%). Of the 6 patients with bone metastases, 5/6 had other metastases (i.e., liver, lung) at baseline. Bone metastases on baseline rectal MRI performed for rectal adenocarcinoma are extremely rare. Furthermore, bone metastases without other organ (i.e., liver, lung) involvement is extremely rare.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone neoplasm; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rectal neoplasm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33543320      PMCID: PMC9309895          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02923-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  25 in total

1.  Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of MRI Reports for Rectal Cancer Staging.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Patricia C Silveira; Nisha I Sainani; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  An Approach to the Evaluation of Incidentally Identified Bone Lesions Encountered on Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Stephanie Bernard; Eric Walker; Meera Raghavan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Haematogenous metastatic patterns in colonic carcinoma: an analysis of 1541 necropsies.

Authors:  L Weiss; E Grundmann; J Torhorst; F Hartveit; I Moberg; M Eder; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J Napier; C H Horne; M J Lopez
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 4.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn J Fowler; Harmeet Kaur; Brooks D Cash; Barry W Feig; Kenneth L Gage; Evelyn M Garcia; Amy K Hara; Joseph M Herman; David H Kim; Drew L Lambert; Angela D Levy; Christine M Peterson; Christopher D Scheirey; William Small; Martin P Smith; Tasneem Lalani; Laura R Carucci
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017.

Authors:  Marc J Gollub; Supreeta Arya; Regina Gh Beets-Tan; Gregory dePrisco; Mithat Gonen; Kartik Jhaveri; Zahra Kassam; Harmeet Kaur; David Kim; Andrea Knezevic; Elena Korngold; Chandana Lall; Neeraj Lalwani; D Blair Macdonald; Courtney Moreno; Stephanie Nougaret; Perry Pickhardt; Shannon Sheedy; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-11

6.  Solitary osseous metastasis of rectal carcinoma masquerading as osteogenic sarcoma on post-chemotherapy imaging: a case report.

Authors:  Amar Udare; Nilesh Sable; Rajiv Kumar; Meenakshi Thakur; Shashikant Juvekar
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Musculoskeletal pitfalls and pseudotumours in the pelvis: a pictorial review for body imagers.

Authors:  S Ghazizadeh; E W Foss; R Didier; A Fung; D M Panicek; F V Coakley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton.

Authors:  C S Simpfendorfer; H Ilaslan; A M Davies; S L James; N A Obuchowski; M Sundaram
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Bull's-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases.

Authors:  M E Schweitzer; C Levine; D G Mitchell; F H Gannon; L G Gomella
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Shandra Bipat; Brunella Barbaro; Luís Curvo-Semedo; Helen M Fenlon; Marc J Gollub; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Steve Halligan; Christine Hoeffel; Seung Ho Kim; Andrea Laghi; Andrea Maier; Søren R Rafaelsen; Jaap Stoker; Stuart A Taylor; Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Marc J Gollub; Gina Brown
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.388

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.