Literature DB >> 28473079

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer.

Kathryn J Fowler1, Harmeet Kaur2, Brooks D Cash3, Barry W Feig4, Kenneth L Gage5, Evelyn M Garcia6, Amy K Hara7, Joseph M Herman8, David H Kim9, Drew L Lambert10, Angela D Levy11, Christine M Peterson12, Christopher D Scheirey13, William Small14, Martin P Smith15, Tasneem Lalani16, Laura R Carucci17.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancers are common tumors in the United States and appropriate imaging is essential to direct appropriate care. Staging and treatment differs between tumors arising in the colon versus the rectum. Local staging for colon cancer is less integral to directing therapy given radical resection is often standard. Surgical options for rectal carcinoma are more varied and rely on accurate assessment of the sphincter, circumferential resection margins, and peritoneal reflection. These important anatomic landmarks are best appreciated on high-resolution imaging with transrectal ultrasound or MRI. When metastatic disease is suspected, imaging modalities that provide a global view of the body, such as CT with contrast or PET/CT may be indicated. Rectal cancer often metastasizes to the liver and so MRI of the liver with and without contrast provides accurate staging for liver metastases. This article focuses on local and distant staging and reviews the appropriateness of different imaging for both variants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; colorectal cancer staging; rectal cancer MRI; rectal cancer imaging; rectal cancer transrectal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28473079     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  12 in total

Review 1.  Current state of the art imaging approaches for colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Bita Hazhirkarzar; Pegah Khoshpouri; Mohammadreza Shaghaghi; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Timothy M Pawlik; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Bone lesions on baseline staging rectal MRI: prevalence and significance in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey Levine; Iva Petkovska; Jonathan Landa; David D B Bates; Marinela Capanu; J Louis Fuqua; Viktoriya Paroder; Junting Zheng; Marc J Gollub; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 3.  Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Bin Tang; Tian-Qiang Jin; Chao-Liu Dai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Early Detection for Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline.

Authors:  Gilberto Lopes; Mariana C Stern; Sarah Temin; Ala I Sharara; Andres Cervantes; Ainhoa Costas-Chavarri; Rena Engineer; Chisato Hamashima; Gwo Fuang Ho; Fidel David Huitzil; Mona Malekzadeh Moghani; Govind Nandakumar; Manish A Shah; Catherine Teh; Sara E Vázquez Manjarrez; Azmina Verjee; Rhonda Yantiss; Marcia Cruz Correa
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-02

Review 5.  Imaging of colorectal cancer - the clue to individualized treatment.

Authors:  Dietmar Tamandl; Thomas Mang; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2018-03-13

Review 6.  [18F]FDG PET/MRI in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Crimì; Silvia Valeggia; Luca Baffoni; Roberto Stramare; Carmelo Lacognata; Gaya Spolverato; Laura Albertoni; Alessandro Spimpolo; Laura Evangelista; Pietro Zucchetta; Diego Cecchin; Salvatore Pucciarelli
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  Clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): study protocol for an international multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  C Verhoef; M G Besselink; J Stoker; B Görgec; I Hansen; G Kemmerich; T Syversveen; M Abu Hilal; E J T Belt; R H C Bisschops; T L Bollen; K Bosscha; M C Burgmans; V Cappendijk; M T De Boer; M D'Hondt; B Edwin; H Gielkens; D J Grünhagen; P Gillardin; P D Gobardhan; H H Hartgrink; K Horsthuis; N F M Kok; P A M Kint; J W H Kruimer; W K G Leclercq; D J Lips; B Lutin; M Maas; H A Marsman; M Morone; J P Pennings; J Peringa; W W Te Riele; M Vermaas; D Wicherts; F E J A Willemssen; B M Zonderhuis; P M M Bossuyt; R J Swijnenburg; Å A Fretland
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Safety evaluation of preoperative stent insertion and clinical analysis on comparison of outcomes between preoperative stent insertion and emergency surgery in the treatment of obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lijiang Han; Xinjiang Song; Bin Yu; Mingliang Zhou; Liping Zhang; Guogang Sun
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 9.  Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: Current controversies and future directions.

Authors:  Fernando López-Campos; Margarita Martín-Martín; Roberto Fornell-Pérez; Juan Carlos García-Pérez; Javier Die-Trill; Raquel Fuentes-Mateos; Sergio López-Durán; José Domínguez-Rullán; Reyes Ferreiro; Alejandro Riquelme-Oliveira; Asunción Hervás-Morón; Felipe Couñago
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  The Clinical Value of the Combined Detection of Enhanced CT, MRI, CEA, and CA199 in the Diagnosis of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Cuijuan Hao; Yanbin Sui; Jian Li; Yunxia Shi; Zhenxing Zou
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.