| Literature DB >> 33543115 |
Uddipta Prafulla Saikia1, N Gopi Chander1, Muthukumar Balasubramanian1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was done to analyse the influence of fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) on brain function by analysing power spectral density of partially edentulous patients.Entities:
Keywords: Brain activity; Cognition; Electroencephalogram; Fast Fourier Transform; Fixed dental prosthesis; Power spectral density
Year: 2020 PMID: 33543115 PMCID: PMC7837703 DOI: 10.26650/eor.20200032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Oral Res ISSN: 2651-2823
Figure 1.Flow chart of study procedure.
Figure 2.Procedure of EEG data acquisition.
Figure 3.The equation for FFT.
Figure 4.The average power spectral density where F (w) XT represents the FFT output. T is the total duration of the input signal.
Pre- and post treatment PSD values obtained from EEG analysis (relative units).
| Sl.No. | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | Post-treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSD value | PSD value one day after cementation | PSD Value three months after FPD cementation | |
| 1 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| 2 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| 3 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| 4 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| 5 | 0.021 | 0.022 | 0.041 |
| 6 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| 7 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| 8 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| 9 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| 10 | 0.046 | 0.047 | 0.058 |
| 11 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| 12 | 0.028 | 0.029 | 0.045 |
| 13 | 0.045 | 0.047 | 0.060 |
| 14 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| 15 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.045 |
Descriptive statistics.
| Mean | Standard Deviation | N | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre restorative EEG PSD Value | 0.175 | 0.013 | 15 |
| Post restorative EEG PSD Value one month after FDP Cementation | 0.178 | 0.013 | 15 |
| Post restorative EEG PSD Value three month after FDP Cementation | 0.0245 | 0.018 | 15 |
Multivariate tests.
| Effect | Value | F | Hypothesis df | Error df | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| factor1 Pillai's Trace | .483 | 6.065a | 2.000 | 13.000 | .014 |
| Wilk's lambda | .517 | 6.065a | 2.000 | 13.000 | .014 |
| Hotelling's Trace | .933 | 6.065a | 2.000 | 13.000 | .014 |
| Roy's Largest Root | .933 | 6.065a | 2.000 | 13.000 | .014 |
Mauchly’s test of sphericity.
| Within subjects effect | Mauchly's W | Approx. Chi-Square | df | Sig. | Epsilon | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse-Geisser | Huynh-Feldt | Lower-bound | |||||
| factor 1 | .006 | 66.313 | 2 | .000 | .502 | .502 | .500 |
Tests of within-subject effects.
| Source | Type III sum of squares | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| factor 1 sphericity Assumed | .000 | 2 | .000 | 11.729 | .000 |
| Greenhouse-Geisser | .000 | 1.003 | .000 | 11.729 | .004 |
| Huynh-Feldt | .000 | 1.004 | .000 | 11.729 | .004 |
| Lower-bound | .000 | 1.000 | .000 | 11.729 | .004 |
| Error (factor 1) sphericity Assumed | .001 | 28 | 2.003E-5 | ||
| Greenhouse-Geisser | .001 | 14.043 | 3.994E-5 | ||
| Huynh-Feldt | .001 | 14.053 | 3.991E-5 | ||
| Lower-bound | .001 | 14.000 | 5.006E-5 |