Literature DB >> 33542334

The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research.

Matthew Gabel1, Jonathan Gooblar2, Catherine M Roe3, John C Morris3.   

Abstract

In the United States, the wide ideological divergence in public confidence in science poses a potentially significant problem for the scientific enterprise. We examine the behavioral consequences of this ideological divide for Americans' contributions to medical research. Based on a mass survey of American adults, we find that engagement in a wide range of medical research activities is a function of a latent propensity to participate. The propensity is systematically higher among liberals than among conservatives. A substantial part of this ideological divide is due to conservative Americans' lower confidence in science. These findings raise important issues for the recruitment of subjects for medical studies and the generalizability of results from such studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33542334      PMCID: PMC7862386          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82516-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  29 in total

1.  Required sample size to detect the mediated effect.

Authors:  Matthew S Fritz; David P Mackinnon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-03

2.  State political ideology, policies and health behaviors: The case of tobacco.

Authors:  Ashley M Fox; Wenhui Feng; Rakesh Yumkham
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Inclusion Across the Lifespan: NIH Policy for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Marie A Bernard; Janine A Clayton; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Political orientation, political environment, and health behaviors in the United States.

Authors:  Viji Diane Kannan; Peter J Veazie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Adequacy of Inclusion of Older Adults in NIH-Funded Phase III Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jaron Lockett; Samir Sauma; Barbara Radziszewska; Marie A Bernard
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.

Authors:  Dena M Gromet; Howard Kunreuther; Richard P Larrick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Is science for atheists? Perceived threat to religious cultural authority explains U.S. Christians' distrust in secularized science.

Authors:  Ain Simpson; Kimberly Rios
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-10

8.  Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Charles F Lynch; Leon F Burmeister
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 9.  Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials: Overcoming Critical Barriers.

Authors:  Luther T Clark; Laurence Watkins; Ileana L Piña; Mary Elmer; Ola Akinboboye; Millicent Gorham; Brenda Jamerson; Cassandra McCullough; Christine Pierre; Adam B Polis; Gary Puckrein; Jeanne M Regnante
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.200

10.  Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.

Authors:  David Kaufman; Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.