Literature DB >> 33541372

Food environment intervention improves food knowledge, wellbeing and dietary habits in primary school children: Project Daire, a randomised-controlled, factorial design cluster trial.

Sarah F Brennan1,2, Fiona Lavelle3, Sarah E Moore3,4, Moira Dean3, Michelle C McKinley3,4,5, Patrick McCole6, Ruth F Hunter4, Laura Dunne5, Niamh E O'Connell3, Chris R Cardwell4, Chris T Elliott3, Danielle McCarthy3, Jayne V Woodside3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that dietary intake of UK children is suboptimal. As schools provide an ideal natural environment for public health interventions, effective and sustainable methods of improving food knowledge and dietary habits in this population must be identified. Project Daire aimed to improve children's health-related quality of life, wellbeing, food knowledge and dietary habits via two multi-component interventions.
METHODS: Daire was a randomised-controlled, factorial design trial evaluating two interventions across four arms. Primary schools in Northern Ireland were randomised to one of four 6-month intervention arms: i) 'Nourish', ii) 'Engage', iii) 'Nourish' and 'Engage' and iv) Control (Delayed). 'Nourish' was an intervention aiming to alter the whole-school food environment, provide food-related experiences and exposure to locally produced foods. 'Engage' was an age-appropriate, cross-curricular educational intervention on food, agriculture, nutrition science and related careers. Primary outcomes were emotional and behavioural wellbeing and health-related quality of life. A number of secondary outcomes, including dietary intake, cooking competence and food-related knowledge, were also measured.
RESULTS: Fifteen schools from areas of varying socio-economic status participated in the randomised trial. A total of 903 (n = 445 aged 6-7 years and n = 458 aged 10-11 years) primary school pupils took part. Total Difficulties Score improved in all pupils (6-7 and 10-11 year old pupils) who received the 'Nourish' intervention compared with those that did not (adjusted difference in mean = - 0.82; 95% CI -1.46, - 0.17; P < 0.02). No statistically significant difference in Health-Related Quality of Life was observed. The 'Nourish' intervention also produced some changes in school-based dietary behaviour, which were most apparent in the 10-11 year old pupils. The 'Nourish' intervention also produced improvements in understanding of food labels (adjusted difference in mean = 0.15; 95% CI 0.05, 0.25; P < 0.01) and knowledge of vegetables in season (adjusted difference in mean = 0.29; 95% CI 0.01,0.56; P = 0.04) whilst an increased willingness to try new foods and improved perceived cooking competence was also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in childhood emotional and behavioural wellbeing, dietary intake, knowledge about food, cooking skills and willingness to try new foods were associated with the 'Nourish' whole-school food environment intervention. Exploration of the sustainability and long-term effectiveness of such whole-school food interventions should be conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Institute of Health (NIH) U.S. National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials.gov (ID: NCT04277312 ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child behaviour; Childhood wellbeing; Children; Diet; Education; Food; Food environment; School; Whole-school approach

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33541372      PMCID: PMC7859905          DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01086-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act        ISSN: 1479-5868            Impact factor:   6.457


  27 in total

1.  Does puberty alter dietary habits in adolescents living in a western society?

Authors:  H Clavien; G Theintz; R Rizzoli; J P Bonjour
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Lessons from complex interventions to improve health.

Authors:  Penelope Hawe
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Factors that contribute to effective nutrition education interventions in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mary W Murimi; Ana Florencia Moyeda-Carabaza; Bong Nguyen; Sanjoy Saha; Ruhul Amin; Valentine Njike
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Face validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing fundamental movement skill perceived competence in young children.

Authors:  Lisa M Barnett; Nicola D Ridgers; Avigdor Zask; Jo Salmon
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; Michael Erhart; Luis Rajmil; Michael Herdman; Pascal Auquier; Jeanet Bruil; Mick Power; Wolfgang Duer; Thomas Abel; Ladislav Czemy; Joanna Mazur; Agnes Czimbalmos; Yannis Tountas; Curt Hagquist; Jean Kilroe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Validity and reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in 5-6 year olds: differences by gender or by parental education?

Authors:  Cathelijne Mieloo; Hein Raat; Floor van Oort; Floor Bevaart; Ineke Vogel; Marianne Donker; Wilma Jansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The World Health Organization's Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Langford; Christopher Bonell; Hayley Jones; Theodora Pouliou; Simon Murphy; Elizabeth Waters; Kelli Komro; Lisa Gibbs; Daniel Magnus; Rona Campbell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Active Smarter Kids (ASK): Rationale and design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of daily physical activity on children's academic performance and risk factors for non-communicable diseases.

Authors:  Geir K Resaland; Vegard Fusche Moe; Eivind Aadland; Jostein Steene-Johannessen; Øyvind Glosvik; John R Andersen; Olav M Kvalheim; Heather A McKay; Sigmund A Anderssen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Graham F Moore; Suzanne Audrey; Mary Barker; Lyndal Bond; Chris Bonell; Wendy Hardeman; Laurence Moore; Alicia O'Cathain; Tannaze Tinati; Daniel Wight; Janis Baird
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-19

10.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Incredible Years® Teacher Classroom Management programme in primary school children: results of the STARS cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Tamsin Ford; Rachel Hayes; Sarah Byford; Vanessa Edwards; Malcolm Fletcher; Stuart Logan; Brahm Norwich; Will Pritchard; Kate Allen; Matthew Allwood; Poushali Ganguli; Katie Grimes; Lorraine Hansford; Bryony Longdon; Shelley Norman; Anna Price; Obioha C Ukoumunne
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  1 in total

1.  An Exploration of Nutritional Education within the Holiday Activities and Food Programme in England.

Authors:  Emily K Round; Jackie Shinwell; Paul B Stretesky; Margaret Anne Defeyter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.