Literature DB >> 33541349

Rhamnolipid coating reduces microbial biofilm formation on titanium implants: an in vitro study.

Erica Tambone1, Emiliana Bonomi1,2, Paolo Ghensi3, Devid Maniglio1, Chiara Ceresa4, Francesca Agostinacchio1, Patrizio Caciagli2, Giandomenico Nollo1,5, Federico Piccoli2, Iole Caola2, Letizia Fracchia4, Francesco Tessarolo6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are biofilm-related diseases causing major concern in oral implantology, requiring complex anti-infective procedures or implant removal. Microbial biosurfactants emerged as new anti-biofilm agents for coating implantable devices preserving biocompatibility. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of rhamnolipid biosurfactant R89 (R89BS) to reduce Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation on titanium.
METHODS: R89BS was physically adsorbed on titanium discs (TDs). Cytotoxicity of coated TDs was evaluated on normal lung fibroblasts (MRC5) using a lactate dehydrogenase assay. The ability of coated TDs to inhibit biofilm formation was evaluated by quantifying biofilm biomass and cell metabolic activity, at different time-points, with respect to uncoated controls. A qualitative analysis of sessile bacteria was also performed by scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: R89BS-coated discs showed no cytotoxic effects. TDs coated with 4 mg/mL R89BS inhibited the biofilm biomass of S. aureus by 99%, 47% and 7% and of S. epidermidis by 54%, 29%, and 10% at 24, 48 and 72 h respectively. A significant reduction of the biofilm metabolic activity was also documented. The same coating applied on three commercial implant surfaces resulted in a biomass inhibition higher than 90% for S. aureus, and up to 78% for S. epidermidis at 24 h.
CONCLUSIONS: R89BS-coating was effective in reducing Staphylococcus biofilm formation at the titanium implant surface. The anti-biofilm action can be obtained on several different commercially available implant surfaces, independently of their surface morphology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Biosurfactant; Dental implants; Staphylococcus spp; Titanium

Year:  2021        PMID: 33541349      PMCID: PMC7863462          DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01412-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Oral Health        ISSN: 1472-6831            Impact factor:   2.757


  74 in total

1.  Controlled release of antibiotics from coated orthopedic implants.

Authors:  J S Price; A F Tencer; D M Arm; G A Bohach
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-03

Review 2.  New Developments of Ti-Based Alloys for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Yuhua Li; Chao Yang; Haidong Zhao; Shengguan Qu; Xiaoqiang Li; Yuanyuan Li
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Primary and Secondary Stability of Implants in Postextraction and Healed Sites: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Luciano Malchiodi; Lucio Balzani; Alessandro Cucchi; Paolo Ghensi; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Supra- and subgingival biofilm formation on implant abutments with different surface characteristics.

Authors:  Cornelius Elter; Wieland Heuer; Anton Demling; Matthias Hannig; Torsten Heidenblut; Friedrich-Wilhelm Bach; Meike Stiesch-Scholz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Prevalence and Mechanisms of Peri-implant Diseases.

Authors:  G E Salvi; R Cosgarea; A Sculean
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces.

Authors:  Laurent Le Guehennec; Marco-Antonio Lopez-Heredia; Benedicte Enkel; Pierre Weiss; Yves Amouriq; Pierre Layrolle
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Interference in adhesion of bacteria and yeasts isolated from explanted voice prostheses to silicone rubber by rhamnolipid biosurfactants.

Authors:  L R Rodrigues; I M Banat; H C van der Mei; J A Teixeira; R Oliveira
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 8.  Micro- and Nanotopography Sensitive Bacterial Attachment Mechanisms: A Review.

Authors:  Yifan Cheng; Guoping Feng; Carmen I Moraru
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Development and characterization of an oral multispecies biofilm implant flow chamber model.

Authors:  Nadine Kommerein; Katharina Doll; Nico S Stumpp; Meike Stiesch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Determinants of corrosion resistance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy dental implants in an In Vitro model of peri-implant inflammation.

Authors:  Larissa O Berbel; Everson do P Banczek; Ioannis K Karoussis; Georgios A Kotsakis; Isolda Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Coating of Dental Implants-Past and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Guilherme Melo Esteves; João Esteves; Marta Resende; Luzia Mendes; Andreia S Azevedo
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

2.  Synthetic and biological surfactant effects on freshwater biofilm community composition and metabolic activity.

Authors:  Stephanie P Gill; William R Hunter; Laura E Coulson; Ibrahim M Banat; Jakob Schelker
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.560

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.