Megha P Bindiganavale1, Heather E Moss1,2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA. 2. Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: Quantitative pupillometry has utility in research settings for measuring optic nerve and autonomic function. We configured a portable device to perform quantitative pupillometry with application to detecting unilateral optic neuropathies in the clinical setting.Materials & methods: Light stimuli were delivered, and pupil diameter responses recorded using customized software implemented on a commercial portable electroretinography device. Increasing pupillary constriction occurred with increasing duration and intensity of full field blue light (470 nm) stimuli in healthy subjects. Flashes of 1 s dim (50 cd/m2) and bright (316 cd/m2) blue light were administered to both eyes of subjects with unilateral optic neuropathies (n = 10) and controls (n = 5). Maximum pupillary constriction (Cmax) for each stimulus was compared between control eyes and optic neuropathy eyes. Cmax for the inter-eye difference curve (Cdiffmax) was compared between control and optic neuropathy subjects. Results: The pupil protocol lasted 15 minutes and was well tolerated by subjects. Cmax for bright and dim stimuli was reduced in eyes with optic neuropathy compared to fellow and control eyes (p < .0005 for all). Inter-eye Cdiffmax was larger in optic neuropathy subjects than control subjects for both dim and bright stimuli (p = .002, <0.0005). There was no overlap between groups for Cmax and Cdiffmax for either stimulus.Conclusions: A portable pupillometer was implemented on a commercial portable electroretinography platform and applied in a pilot manner to subjects with and without unilateral optic neuropathies. Optic neuropathy eyes were distinguished from non-optic neuropathy eyes both within and between subjects.
Purpose: Quantitative pupillometry has utility in research settings for measuring optic nerve and autonomic function. We configured a portable device to perform quantitative pupillometry with application to detecting unilateral optic neuropathies in the clinical setting.Materials & methods: Light stimuli were delivered, and pupil diameter responses recorded using customized software implemented on a commercial portable electroretinography device. Increasing pupillary constriction occurred with increasing duration and intensity of full field blue light (470 nm) stimuli in healthy subjects. Flashes of 1 s dim (50 cd/m2) and bright (316 cd/m2) blue light were administered to both eyes of subjects with unilateral optic neuropathies (n = 10) and controls (n = 5). Maximum pupillary constriction (Cmax) for each stimulus was compared between control eyes and optic neuropathy eyes. Cmax for the inter-eye difference curve (Cdiffmax) was compared between control and optic neuropathy subjects. Results: The pupil protocol lasted 15 minutes and was well tolerated by subjects. Cmax for bright and dim stimuli was reduced in eyes with optic neuropathy compared to fellow and control eyes (p < .0005 for all). Inter-eye Cdiffmax was larger in optic neuropathy subjects than control subjects for both dim and bright stimuli (p = .002, <0.0005). There was no overlap between groups for Cmax and Cdiffmax for either stimulus.Conclusions: A portable pupillometer was implemented on a commercial portable electroretinography platform and applied in a pilot manner to subjects with and without unilateral optic neuropathies. Optic neuropathy eyes were distinguished from non-optic neuropathy eyes both within and between subjects.
Authors: Nicholas J Volpe; Laila Dadvand; Shane K Kim; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-Shuang Ying; Mark L Moster; Steven L Galetta Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Jason C Park; Ana L Moura; Ali S Raza; David W Rhee; Randy H Kardon; Donald C Hood Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 4.799