Literature DB >> 33540940

The Early Detection of Osteoporosis in a Cohort of Healthcare Workers: Is There Room for a Screening Program?

Carmela Rinaldi1,2, Sara Bortoluzzi1, Chiara Airoldi1, Fabrizio Leigheb1,2, Daniele Nicolini1, Sophia Russotto3, Kris Vanhaecht4, Massimiliano Panella1.   

Abstract

Workforce aging is becoming a significant public health problem due to the resulting emergence of age-related diseases, such as osteoporosis. The prevention and early detection of osteoporosis is important to avoid bone fractures and their socio-economic burden. The aim of this study is to evaluate the sustainability of a screening workplace program able to detect workers with osteoporosis. The screening process included a questionnaire-based risk assessment of 1050 healthcare workers followed by measurement of the bone mass density (BMD) with a pulse-echo ultrasound (PEUS) at the proximal tibia in the at-risk subjects. Workers with a BMD value ≤ 0.783 g/cm² were referred to a specialist visit ensuring a diagnosis and the consequent prescriptions. Any possible association between the outcome variable BMD ≤ 0.783 g/cm² and the risk factors was evaluated. The costs were calculated with a full costing method. We identified 60 pathological subjects. We observed increased risks for women, older ages, and menopause (p < 0.01). The yearly cost of our screening program estimated for this study was 8242 euros, and, considering the fragility bone fracture costs, we hypothesize a considerable economic savings, with a possible positive benefits/cost ratio of 2.07. We can say that the margin between the investment and results leads to a preference for this type of screening program. Osteoporosis is an occupational health problem, and a workplace screening program could be a cost-effective intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  osteoporosis; prevention; public health; screening; worker health; workplace

Year:  2021        PMID: 33540940      PMCID: PMC7908569          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  10 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening followed by treatment: the impact of medication adherence.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Henry-Jean Gathon; Olivier Bruyère; Olivier Ethgen; Véronique Rabenda; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 2.  Workplace health promotion: a meta-analysis of effectiveness.

Authors:  Anne Rongen; Suzan J W Robroek; Frank J van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Screening in the Community to Reduce Osteoporotic Fractures in Older Women in the UK: Economic Evaluation of the SCOOP Study.

Authors:  David A Turner; Rebekah Fong Soe Khioe; Lee Shepstone; Elizabeth Lenaghan; Cyrus Cooper; Neil Gittoes; Nicholas C Harvey; Richard Holland; Amanda Howe; Eugene McCloskey; Terence W O'Neill; David Torgerson; Richard Fordham
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  New method for point-of-care osteoporosis screening and diagnostics.

Authors:  J P Karjalainen; O Riekkinen; J Töyräs; J S Jurvelin; H Kröger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for improving bone health in women at high risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Eui Geum Oh; Jung Eun Lee; Jae Yong Yoo
Journal:  JBI Libr Syst Rev       Date:  2012

Review 6.  Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).

Authors:  E Hernlund; A Svedbom; M Ivergård; J Compston; C Cooper; J Stenmark; E V McCloskey; B Jönsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Accumulation of risk factors associated with poor bone health in older adults.

Authors:  Jean Zhang; Karen Jameson; Avan Aihie Sayer; Sian Robinson; Cyrus Cooper; Elaine Dennison
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Efficacy of a workplace osteoporosis prevention intervention: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Ai May Tan; Anthony D LaMontagne; Dallas R English; Peter Howard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Workplace health promotion for older workers: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Andrea Poscia; Umberto Moscato; Daniele Ignazio La Milia; Sonja Milovanovic; Jovana Stojanovic; Alice Borghini; Agnese Collamati; Walter Ricciardi; Nicola Magnavita
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Cost-effectiveness of pulse-echo ultrasonometry in osteoporosis management.

Authors:  Erkki Soini; Ossi Riekkinen; Heikki Kröger; Petri Mankinen; Taru Hallinen; Janne P Karjalainen
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-05-29
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Work-Related Stress among a Cohort of Italian Long-Term Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Andrea Conti; Sophia Russotto; Annalisa Opizzi; Matteo Ratti; Daniele Nicolini; Kris Vanhaecht; Massimiliano Panella
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.