Literature DB >> 33539103

Ultrafast Transient Holographic Microscopy.

Matz Liebel1, Franco V A Camargo2, Giulio Cerullo2, Niek F van Hulst1,3.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology is increasingly being applied in many emerging technologies, ranging from metamaterials to next-generation nanodrugs. A key ingredient for its success is the ability to specifically tailor ultrafast nanoscale light-matter interactions over very large areas. Unfortunately, dynamic imaging by ultrafast nanoscopy so far remains limited to very small 2D areas. This shortcoming prevents connecting single-particle observations with large-scale functionality. Here, we address this experimental challenge by combining concepts of ultrafast spectroscopy, wide-field nanoscopy, and digital holography. We introduce an ultrafast holographic transient microscope for wide-field transient nanoscale imaging with high frequency all-optical signal demodulation. We simultaneously record ultrafast transient dynamics of many individual nano-objects and demonstrate time-resolved spectroscopy of gold nanoparticles over a large volume irrespective of their x-y-z position. Our results pave the way to single-shot 3D microscopy of 2D and 3D materials on arbitrary time scales from femtosecond carrier dynamics in optoelectronic materials to millisecond dynamics in complex tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Holography; nanoparticles; photothermal microscopy; plasmonics; transient absorption imaging; ultrafast dynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33539103      PMCID: PMC7909069          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


Ultrafast nanoscopy is an emerging technology for studying transient phenomena on subwavelength scales[1−6] such as energy flow in semiconductor devices or the spectro-temporal dynamics of single nanoparticles and even single molecules.[7−9] Despite these advances, observations remain limited to very small 2D areas, which hinders single-shot capture of spatiotemporal images or the acquisition of sufficiently large data sets that allow quantifying the heterogeneous nature of many nanomaterials. As such, ultrafast studies of novel materials to visualize, for example, the temporal switching of metamaterials[10] or quantify light–matter interactions in strongly coupled systems[11] remain challenging to implement. Additionally, experiments addressing spatially more complex phenomena such as visualizing carrier diffusion in 3D[12] or quantifying the uptake and photoinduced heating of theranostic agents in tissue[9,13] are currently near-impossible to implement. Ideally, large field-of-view 3D transient nanoscopy would alleviate these limitations but requires high-frequency signal demodulation, which is currently incompatible with the typical frame rates of 2D cameras. Here, we implement an all-optical ultrafast holographic transient (UHT) lock-in microscope that allows signal demodulation at arbitrary frequencies, independent of the camera frame rate. We demonstrate its broad applicability by simultaneously imaging dozens of individual gold nanoparticles (NPs) with diameters ranging from 20 to 100 nm, and simultaneously following their transient dynamics. We furthermore show that UHT microscopy is capable of computationally refocusing out-of-focus particles, thus paving the way toward 3D localization microspectroscopy over large volumes of view. Figure a schematically depicts an experimental implementation of the UHT microscope, which can be conceptually separated into imaging and interference subsections. The former consists of collinear pump and probe pulses illuminating the sample and a dark-field microscope that images the sample-scattering onto a CMOS camera (Methods). As in a conventional transient absorption experiment, a chopper modulates the pump and the probe interrogates the sample in the presence and absence of photoexcitation as a function of pump–probe time delay.
Figure 1

UHT microscope: an all-optical lock-in camera. (a) Experimental implementation of UHT microscopy with transient pump-delayed-probe imaging, and interference with modulated reference beams, allowing all-optical lock-in wide-field imaging on a camera. SHG, second harmonic generation; NOPA, noncollinear optical parametric amplifier. (b) Chopping scheme employed, 1/f = 1 ms is the time between individual laser pulses with f being the repetition rate of the laser system. (c) Data-processing workflow allowing retrieval of the scattering images for the pumped and unpumped sample by Fourier filtering in k-space. (d) Fluctuations of the radius of the pumpOFF (blue) and pumpON (pink) interference signals, recorded at 10 frames-per-second (FPS), alongside their ratio (black, dashed). (e) Relative pumpOFF/pumpON signal fluctuations recorded at 100 FPS (pink) and 10 FPS (purple) compared to shot-noise distributions (blue dashed lines) exhibiting 104 and 105 photons, respectively.

UHT microscope: an all-optical lock-in camera. (a) Experimental implementation of UHT microscopy with transient pump-delayed-probe imaging, and interference with modulated reference beams, allowing all-optical lock-in wide-field imaging on a camera. SHG, second harmonic generation; NOPA, noncollinear optical parametric amplifier. (b) Chopping scheme employed, 1/f = 1 ms is the time between individual laser pulses with f being the repetition rate of the laser system. (c) Data-processing workflow allowing retrieval of the scattering images for the pumped and unpumped sample by Fourier filtering in k-space. (d) Fluctuations of the radius of the pumpOFF (blue) and pumpON (pink) interference signals, recorded at 10 frames-per-second (FPS), alongside their ratio (black, dashed). (e) Relative pumpOFF/pumpON signal fluctuations recorded at 100 FPS (pink) and 10 FPS (purple) compared to shot-noise distributions (blue dashed lines) exhibiting 104 and 105 photons, respectively. The UHT microscope relies on multiplexed off-axis holography[14−16] to avoid restricting the pump modulation frequency to half the camera frame rate[17] and allow simultaneous recording of both pumped and unpumped images in a single camera exposure (Figure a). We generate suitable reference waves for the holographic experiment by diffracting a fraction of the probe pulse with a 2D 0-π phase grating and relay-image two of the first diffraction orders onto the camera, where they interfere with the sample scattering (Methods).[16,18,19] A mechanical chopper, placed in the Fourier plane of the relay-imaging system, ensures that one diffraction order illuminates the camera when the pump is blocked and the other when the pump illuminates the sample (Figure a,b). This experimental implementation allows separating pumpOFF and pumpON images in a holographic postprocessing step,[16,20] as can be understood by considering the total signal acquired on the camera, Iimagewhere ErOFF and ErON are the electric fields of the references waves in the absence and presence of the pump pulse and ESOFF and EsON are the corresponding signal waves; c.c. stands for complex conjugate. As indicated in Figure a, ErON and ErOFF exhibit different wavevectors thus moving the interference terms, ErOFF*EsOFF + ErON*EsON + c.c., to distinct positions in momentum-space.[21] They are hence easily accessible via a spatial Fourier transformation of the raw image, which reveals the diagonally shifted interference terms reminiscent of the microscope’s back-focal-plane with the dark-field stop being visible in its center covering approximately one-third of the radius (Figure c, Supporting Information and Methods). Fourier-filtering[20] is hence sufficient to isolate the images acquired in the presence and absence of the pump. The simultaneous recording of pumpON and pumpOFF images for consecutive pulses in a single exposure, furthermore, allows removing strongly correlated fluctuations by dividing the two (Figure d), and enables transient imaging near the shot-noise limit (Figure e). Our UHT microscope thus acts as an all-optical wide-field lock-in camera, which allows selecting arbitrary modulation frequencies and signal integration times with only the latter being determined by the camera exposure time. Compared to traditional lock-in amplifier-based demodulation approaches in a point-scanning configuration,[3,4] UHT microscopy directly demodulates entire 2D images, but crucially relies on the coherent nature of the signal of interest. To demonstrate the capability of UHT microscopy to record temporally-resolved wide-field dynamics, we perform experiments on a sample composed of many individual 100 nm diameter gold NPs. Figure a shows an image acquired with a 540 nm probe pulse, where the diffraction-limited spots are due to scattering of individual NPs. A 400 nm pump pulse photoexcites the NPs and we simultaneously record pumpOFF and pumpON images as a function of pump-probe delay as outlined above. These image stacks allow accessing the transient dynamics of all individual NPs simultaneously by comparing their integrated scattering signal in the absence and presence of the pump (Figure b). At negative time delays, we observe nearly identical scattering signals, followed by a considerable pumpON signal decrease at positive delays rising within the ∼200 fs instrumental response function. The transient signal shows the typical picosecond cooling dynamics of metallic nanoparticles due to thermalization of the hot electron distribution with the phonon bath.[2,22,23]
Figure 2

Wide-field transient imaging of single nanoparticles. (a) PumpOFF image of individual 100 nm Au-NPs. (b) Time-delay dependent scattering signal magnitudes at a probe wavelength of 540 nm for the five individual particles encircled in (a) recorded in the presence (pink) and absence (blue) of the 400 nm pump pulse with a fluence of 1.1 mJ/cm2. (c) Transient images within the dashed-rectangle in (a) for three different probe wavelengths as a function of pump–probe delay. From 540 to 500 nm, the NP transient-contrast inverts from negative to positive; note the black circles highlighting some NPs with signal-scaling that are considerably different from the average behavior (see Supporting Information for transient images of the entire field-of-view).

Wide-field transient imaging of single nanoparticles. (a) PumpOFF image of individual 100 nm Au-NPs. (b) Time-delay dependent scattering signal magnitudes at a probe wavelength of 540 nm for the five individual particles encircled in (a) recorded in the presence (pink) and absence (blue) of the 400 nm pump pulse with a fluence of 1.1 mJ/cm2. (c) Transient images within the dashed-rectangle in (a) for three different probe wavelengths as a function of pump–probe delay. From 540 to 500 nm, the NP transient-contrast inverts from negative to positive; note the black circles highlighting some NPs with signal-scaling that are considerably different from the average behavior (see Supporting Information for transient images of the entire field-of-view). When tuning the probe wavelength from 540 to 500 nm across the spectral region of the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR),[23,24] we observe a sign inversion of the transient signal, computed as ΔS(t) = ArONAsON(t) – ArOFFAsOFF(t), where AsON (AsOFF) and ArON (ArOFF) are the electric field amplitudes of signal and reference waves, defined as , in the presence (absence) of the pump (Figure c and Supplementary Figure 1). Importantly, we directly uncover subtle details beyond the ensemble picture, as individual particles show distinctly different behavior with widely varying signals, an observation that is especially pronounced at 520 nm. Next, to fully resolve the spectro-temporal differences, we record wavelength-resolved UHT images by tuning the probe from 500 to 651 nm, while keeping the pump at 400 nm (Methods and Supplementary Figure 3 for additional experiments performed on 200 nm NPs). Figure a shows the time-dependent transient scattering signal, , for 76 simultaneously measured single NPs alongside their mean signal (Methods). The slight differences in decay kinetics (Figure a) are due to the varying pump fluence on the individual NPs, which results in different NP-heating and hence cooling dynamics, as verified by conducting additional measurements at different excitation fluences (Supplementary Figure 6).
Figure 3

UHT imaging of single nanoparticle spectro-temporal dynamics. (a) Spectrally resolved transient dynamics of 76 individual 100 nm Au NPs (colored) alongside the mean dynamics (black). The transients are offset for clarity with the dashed line indicating ΔS/S(t) = 0 for the individual wavelengths. The wavelength dependent probe fluences are adjusted within the 0.1–0.4 mJ/cm2 range and the pump fluence is 1.1 mJ/cm2 (at 1/e). (b) Temporal representation of the decay dynamics of the averaged transient scattering spectra. (c) Histogram representation of the ΔS/S(t) signal obtained by analyzing each individual NP in the 100–900 fs temporal window.

UHT imaging of single nanoparticle spectro-temporal dynamics. (a) Spectrally resolved transient dynamics of 76 individual 100 nm Au NPs (colored) alongside the mean dynamics (black). The transients are offset for clarity with the dashed line indicating ΔS/S(t) = 0 for the individual wavelengths. The wavelength dependent probe fluences are adjusted within the 0.1–0.4 mJ/cm2 range and the pump fluence is 1.1 mJ/cm2 (at 1/e). (b) Temporal representation of the decay dynamics of the averaged transient scattering spectra. (c) Histogram representation of the ΔS/S(t) signal obtained by analyzing each individual NP in the 100–900 fs temporal window. Beyond the heating-induced differences, the 520–540 nm spectral region highlights the need for single-particle level spectroscopy as the mean signal fails to capture the widely differing transients. While the particle-averaged transient dynamics are a good estimate for the mean sample performance (Figure b), the underlying single-particle data paint a much more diverse picture (Figure c). Importantly, the histogram-spread is not due to experimental noise but a direct result of the size and shape heterogeneity of the NPs as well as their interaction with their specific nanoscopic environment.[25] In line with previous experiments on gold NPs that predominantly monitored either transient absorption or transient extinction changes, we observe a broadening of the LSPR which results in a net bleach of the transition.[26−28] The initially excited hot electron distribution rapidly thermalizes with the lattice phonons within a few picoseconds, resulting in bleach recovery. The residual ΔS/S(t) signal at long delays (>40 ps) is due to the vibrationally hot NPs which slowly cool via NP-substrate coupling over time-scales far exceeding our experimental observation window.[29] Having assessed the capability of UHT microscopy to perform wide-field transient imaging and spectroscopy, we evaluate the sensitivity of our method. The interferometric detection of the scattered field amplitude makes UHT microscopy particularly effective for detecting small NPs. To test the limits of recording wide-field transient NP dynamics we perform experiments while gradually reducing the particle diameter to 20 nm. Figure a compares the holographically recorded scattering images of representative Au NPs of different sizes. As we reduce the particle size it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish NP scattering and background. For 20 nm NPs, recorded in wide-field transmission geometry with a spatially coherent light source, both image contributions are essentially identical thus rendering the confident identification of the Au NPs with a standard holographic microscope as difficult to impossible. However, UHT microscopy is capable of recording transient images over a wide range of NP sizes (Figure a,b) that could even be boosted by approximately 1 order of magnitude by exchanging our NA = 0.5 objective for a higher NA oil-immersion objective.
Figure 4

Signal scaling for different particle sizes. (a) Holographic (left) and transient scattering images (right) recorded for NP-diameters ranging from 100 to 20 nm using a 400 nm pump and a 540 nm probe pulse (see Methods for fluences). Circles indicate NPs, diamonds indicate a representative background region. (b) Time-traces of the particles highlighted in (a); the scale-bar indicates the relative scattering signal normalized to both pump intensity and probe amplitude. Blue lines indicate signals obtained at a background region and pink lines indicate signals due to NPs.

Signal scaling for different particle sizes. (a) Holographic (left) and transient scattering images (right) recorded for NP-diameters ranging from 100 to 20 nm using a 400 nm pump and a 540 nm probe pulse (see Methods for fluences). Circles indicate NPs, diamonds indicate a representative background region. (b) Time-traces of the particles highlighted in (a); the scale-bar indicates the relative scattering signal normalized to both pump intensity and probe amplitude. Blue lines indicate signals obtained at a background region and pink lines indicate signals due to NPs. Thus far, we have concentrated on spectroscopic and sensitivity aspects of UHT microscopy and ignored its holographic imaging capabilities. Beyond enabling wide-field lock-in detection, off-axis holography interferometrically measures both amplitude and phase information of an image. This direct access to the full electric field allows digital image processing, such as computational focusing postacquisition, which enables 3D particle localization over large volumes-of-view from a single image.[30]Figure a shows the typical information obtained from a hologram, processed as outlined previously (Figure c), for a sample containing 100 nm Au NPs placed at different relative distances with respect to the focal plane. The defocused NPs show the expected point-spread-function reminiscent of the imaging system used but the phase term reveals additional information. Depending on the precise location of the individual NPs with respect to the focal plane, we observe different amounts of spherical phase as well as a curvature inversion as we move through the focus.
Figure 5

Digital refocusing of out-of-focus nanoparticles. (a) Scattering amplitude and phase of 100 nm Au NPs imaged below (left), above (center) and approximately in (right) the focal plane. (b) Representative images of the digitally refocused particles. (c) Transient wide-field-dynamics for the as-recorded, −1860 nm out-of-focus, image (top) as well as the refocused image obtained by computational back-propagation into focus (bottom).

Digital refocusing of out-of-focus nanoparticles. (a) Scattering amplitude and phase of 100 nm Au NPs imaged below (left), above (center) and approximately in (right) the focal plane. (b) Representative images of the digitally refocused particles. (c) Transient wide-field-dynamics for the as-recorded, −1860 nm out-of-focus, image (top) as well as the refocused image obtained by computational back-propagation into focus (bottom). We computationally refocus the out-of-focus images with the angular spectrum method[21,31] (Methods) and obtain near-identical images, irrespective of whether the particles are imaged near or far away from the image plane (Figure b). The same approach can be applied to UHT microscopy, allowing transient imaging and 3D localization of out-of-focus particles. Figure c validates this statement by comparing transient scattering images, recorded −1860 nm out-of-focus, of a 100 nm Au NP-sample with their refocused versions. While we see signs of the transient signal in the as-recorded image, the digitally refocused transient images show clear NP signatures comparable to the previously presented in-focus experiments (Figures –4). Importantly, while we purposely chose a small defocus value of less than 2 μm, to allow visual identification of the individual NPs in the image, even >30 μm defocused images are easily propagated back into focus.[30,32] To summarize, we implemented a novel holographic transient, or UHT, microscope that allows performing wide-field pump–probe imaging. The platform yields complex images, comprised of both amplitude and phase terms, in a lock-in amplifier-like fashion irrespective of the camera’s integration time. We demonstrated the platform’s viability by simultaneously recording the spectro-temporally resolved transient dynamics of several tens of gold NPs with diameters as small as 20 nm and single-particle sensitivity. We deliberately chose the well-established gold NP system to allow direct intraplatform comparison with, for example, photothermal microscopes to aid the rapid adoption of the UHT technology by interested researchers. Beyond the NPs’ dynamics, the simultaneously recorded phase information allows digital image propagation, thus paving the way toward recording transient dynamics of complex 3D samples and potentially transient absorption tomography. These advances are an important step toward highly multiplexed 3D transient absorption microscopy and will enable rationalizing structure–function relationships beyond 2D projections. Additionally, our results are highly relevant for single-particle tracking applications where background and photobleaching-free imaging methodologies are highly sought after. Especially for live cell and tissue imaging, our transient single-shot wide-field alternative to traditional point-scanning[33,34] photothermal microscopy eliminates the unfavorable temperature loss to the high heat-capacity solvent water and will allow real-time background-free imaging of intracellular processes over arbitrary observation times.

Methods

UHT Microscope

Spectrally tunable pulses are generated by a home-built noncollinear optical parametric amplifier (NOPA), pumped by a 1 kHz, 100 fs amplified Ti:sapphire laser, as described previously.[35] The 400 nm pump-pulse is directly obtained by frequency doubling the laser output. A 90:10 beam splitter generates the probe and the reference from the NOPA output. The former is made collinear with the pump-pulse and focused onto the sample by means of a F = 200 mm achromatic lens. A home-built transmission dark-field microscope (NA = 0.5, Olympus RMS20X-PF), equipped with a dark-field mask in proximity of its back-focal-plane and a 488 nm long-pass filter (488 nm EdgeBasic, Semrock), images the sample scattering onto a CMOS camera (acA2040-90um Basler ace, Basler AG) at a nominal magnification of 37×. To allow holographic imaging we propagate the 10% probe-fraction through a relay-imaging system (nominal magnification 0.5×) onto the same CMOS camera and place a 2D 0-π phase grating (25.6 grooves/mm) into the conjugate image plane to allow interference over the entire camera chip.[19] We block all but two of the four first diffraction orders and modulate these two by means of a mechanical chopper thus separating pumpOFF and pumpON interference terms as described in detail in the main text. The time-delay between signal and reference pulses is adjusted by maximizing the fringe contrast with a mechanical delay line. Pump–probe time-delay dependent images are recorded by means of a computer-controlled translation stage (M-531.PD1, Physik Instrumente).

Sample Preparation

A cover glass (#1.5) is cleaned by 10 min sonication in acetone, 10 min sonication in Milli-Q water, drying under a stream of N2, followed by a 5 min oxygen plasma treatment (Femto, Diener electronic GmbH). The cleaned glass is then incubated with PLL-g-PEG (SuSoS AG) for approximately 10 min, followed by a dilute Au NP-solution with the diameter of choice (citrate capped 20, 40, 80, 100, 200 nm all BBI Solutions). Once the NPs are bound, the residual solution is removed and the substrate is used for the optical experiments. Prior to performing UHT experiments, we characterized all samples using a k-scope which is capable of accurately sizing Au NPs in the 20–250 nm size-range.[36]

Experimental Parameters

Unless stated differently, the pump/probe fluences throughout the manuscript are given as 1/e values. For the experiments presented in Figure , the fluences are the following: 100 nm NPs, 1.03 mJ/cm2 pump, 0.15 mJ/cm2 probe; 80 nm NPs, 1.74 mJ/cm2 pump, 0.39 mJ/cm2 probe; 40 and 20 nm NPs, 1.74 mJ/cm2 pump, 1.59 mJ/cm2 probe.

Angular Spectrum Method

We perform image-propagation via the angular spectrum method.[21] Briefly, the processed N × N holograms are convolved with a propagation kernel of the formwhere k = 2nπ /λ, with n = 1 being the refractive index of air. The discretized spatial frequencies are (k,k) = 2π/nΔx(x,y) for (−N/2 ≤ x,y < N/2) with Δx representing the magnified pixel size of the imaging system.

ΔS/S(t) and ΔS

Because of the dark-field nature of the UHT microscope, image regions without particles exhibit amplitudes close to zero. As a result, the intuitive differential scattering expression, , which reports on the relative scattering signal change due to photoexcitation, cannot be computed for images as for many points ArOFFAsOFF ∼ 0. To nevertheless show UHT images we employ the signal differences, ΔS(t) = ArONAsON(t) – ArOFFAsOFF(t) when images are reported where ArOFFAsOFF(t) is often close to zero in regions where no particles are present.
  24 in total

1.  Optical properties and ultrafast dynamics of metallic nanocrystals.

Authors:  Stephan Link; Mostafa A El-Sayed
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 12.703

2.  Polarization microscopy by use of digital holography: application to optical-fiber birefringence measurements.

Authors:  Tristan Colomb; Florian Dürr; Etienne Cuche; Pierre Marquet; Hans G Limberger; René-Paul Salathé; Christian Depeursinge
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Single nanoparticle photothermal tracking (SNaPT) of 5-nm gold beads in live cells.

Authors:  David Lasne; Gerhard A Blab; Stéphane Berciaud; Martin Heine; Laurent Groc; Daniel Choquet; Laurent Cognet; Brahim Lounis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  How to make femtosecond pulses overlap.

Authors:  A A Maznev; T F Crimmins; K A Nelson
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 5.  Nanomaterials for theranostics: recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lim; Taekhoon Kim; Soonmyung Paik; Seungjoo Haam; Yong-Min Huh; Kwangyeol Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Precise Nanosizing with High Dynamic Range Holography.

Authors:  Unai Ortiz-Orruño; Ala Jo; Hakho Lee; Niek F van Hulst; Matz Liebel
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Six-pack off-axis holography.

Authors:  Moran Rubin; Gili Dardikman; Simcha K Mirsky; Nir A Turko; Natan T Shaked
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Space- and time-resolved UV-to-NIR surface spectroscopy and 2D nanoscopy at 1 MHz repetition rate.

Authors:  Bernhard Huber; Sebastian Pres; Emanuel Wittmann; Lysanne Dietrich; Julian Lüttig; Daniel Fersch; Enno Krauss; Daniel Friedrich; Johannes Kern; Victor Lisinetskii; Matthias Hensen; Bert Hecht; Rudolf Bratschitsch; Eberhard Riedle; Tobias Brixner
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.523

9.  Long-range hot-carrier transport in hybrid perovskites visualized by ultrafast microscopy.

Authors:  Zhi Guo; Yan Wan; Mengjin Yang; Jordan Snaider; Kai Zhu; Libai Huang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Tracking ultrafast hot-electron diffusion in space and time by ultrafast thermomodulation microscopy.

Authors:  A Block; M Liebel; R Yu; M Spector; Y Sivan; F J García de Abajo; N F van Hulst
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Optical Microscopy Systems for the Detection of Unlabeled Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ralf P Friedrich; Mona Kappes; Iwona Cicha; Rainer Tietze; Christian Braun; Regine Schneider-Stock; Roland Nagy; Christoph Alexiou; Christina Janko
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-05-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.