Literature DB >> 33539000

Stock price reaction to the drug development setbacks in the pharmaceutical industry.

Silvijus Abramavičius1, Alina Stundžienė2, Laura Korsakova3, Mantas Venslauskas4, Edgaras Stankevičius5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Investments in pharmaceutical companies remain challenging due to the inherent uncertainties of risk assessment.
OBJECTIVES: Our paper aims to assess the impact of the drug development setbacks (DDS) on the stock price of pharmaceutical companies while taking into account the company's financial situation, pipeline size and trend of the stock price before the DDS.
METHODS: The model-based clustering based on finite Gaussian mixture modeling was employed to identify the clusters of pharmaceutical companies with homogenous parameters. An artificial neural network was constructed to aid the prediction of the positive mean rate of return 120 days after the DDS.
RESULTS: Our results reveal that a higher pipeline size and a lower rate of return before the DDS, as well as a lower ratio of the market value of the equity and the book value of the total liabilities, are associated with a positive mean rate of return 120 days after the DDS.
CONCLUSION: In general, the DDS have a negative impact on the company's stock price, but this risk can be minimized by investors choosing the companies that satisfy certain criteria. Graphical abstract The higher pipeline size(spip) and lower rate of return before (srr) the drug development setback (DDS) and the Market Value of Equity/Book Value of Total Liabilities ratio (sx4) are associated with a positive mean rate of return 120 days after the DDS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug development setbacks; Investment risk assessment; Pharmaceutical companies; Stock price

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33539000      PMCID: PMC8149546          DOI: 10.1007/s40199-020-00349-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Daru        ISSN: 1560-8115            Impact factor:   3.117


  10 in total

1.  Company stock prices before and after public announcements related to oncology drugs.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Rothenstein; George Tomlinson; Ian F Tannock; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  What's the difference between a hedge fund and a mutual fund?

Authors:  Douglas R McKay; Daniel A Peters
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  NeuralNetTools: Visualization and Analysis Tools for Neural Networks.

Authors:  Marcus W Beck
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 4.  The totality-of-the-evidence approach to the development and assessment of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar.

Authors:  Vibeke Strand; Giampiero Girolomoni; Martin Schiestl; Robert Ernst Mayer; Hilke Friccius-Quecke; Mark McCamish
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.580

5.  Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?

Authors:  Richard T Thakor; Nicholas Anaya; Yuwei Zhang; Christian Vilanilam; Kien Wei Siah; Chi Heem Wong; Andrew W Lo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models.

Authors:  Luca Scrucca; Michael Fop; T Brendan Murphy; Adrian E Raftery
Journal:  R J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Stock market returns and clinical trial results of investigational compounds: an event study analysis of large biopharmaceutical companies.

Authors:  Thomas J Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Decision-making in product portfolios of pharmaceutical research and development--managing streams of innovation in highly regulated markets.

Authors:  Antti Jekunen
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries.

Authors:  Cedric Popa; Karel Holvoet; Tessa Van Montfort; Floris Groeneveld; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Model-based clustering based on sparse finite Gaussian mixtures.

Authors:  Gertraud Malsiner-Walli; Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter; Bettina Grün
Journal:  Stat Comput       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.559

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.