Literature DB >> 33538475

The Surgical Program in Innovation (SPIN): A Design and Prototyping Curriculum for Surgical Trainees.

Daniel J Wong1, David Miranda-Nieves2, Prathima Nandivada3, Madhukar S Patel4, Daniel A Hashimoto5, Daniel O Kent6, José Gómez-Márquez7, Samuel J Lin8, Henry J Feldman9, Elliot L Chaikof10.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: Health professions education does not routinely incorporate training in innovation or creative problem solving. Although some models of innovation education within graduate medical education exist, they often require participants' full-time commitment and removal from clinical training or rely upon participants' existing expertise. There is a need for curricula that teach innovation skills that will enable trainees to identify and solve unmet clinical challenges in everyday practice. To address this gap in surgical graduate education, the authors developed the Surgical Program in Innovation (SPIN). APPROACH: SPIN, a 6-month workshop-based curriculum, was established in 2016 in the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Department of Surgery to teach surgical trainees the basics of the innovation process, focusing on surgeon-driven problem identification, product design, prototype fabrication, and initial steps in the commercialization process. Participating surgical residents and graduate students attend monthly workshops taught by medical, engineering, and medical technology (MedTech) industry faculty. Participants collaborate in teams to develop a novel device, fabricate a protype, and pitch their product to a panel of judges. OUTCOMES: From academic years 2015-2016 to 2017-2018, 49 trainees, including 41 surgical residents, participated in SPIN. Across this period, 13 teams identified an unmet need, ideated a solution, and designed and pitched a novel device. Ten teams fabricated prototypes. The 22 SPIN participants who responded to both pre- and postcourse surveys reported significant increases in confidence in generating problem statements, computer-aided design, fabrication of a prototype, and initial commercialization steps (product pitching and business planning). NEXT STEPS: Incorporating innovation education and design thinking into clinical training will prove essential in preparing future physicians to be lifelong problem finders and solvers. The authors plan to expand SPIN to additional clinical specialties, as well as to assess its impact in fostering future innovation and collaboration among program participants.
Copyright © 2021 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33538475      PMCID: PMC9035335          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   7.840


  7 in total

1.  Fostering innovation in medicine and health care: what must academic health centers do?

Authors:  Victor J Dzau; Ziggy Yoediono; William F Ellaissi; Alex H Cho
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  Teaching biomedical technology innovation as a discipline.

Authors:  Paul G Yock; Todd J Brinton; Stefanos A Zenios
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Fostering a culture of innovation in academic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel P McCarthy
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Less noise, more hacking: how to deploy principles from MIT's hacking medicine to accelerate health care.

Authors:  Jacqueline W DePasse; Ryan Carroll; Andrea Ippolito; Allison Yost; Data Santorino; Zen Chu; Kristian R Olson
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Outcomes from a postgraduate biomedical technology innovation training program: the first 12 years of Stanford Biodesign.

Authors:  Todd J Brinton; Christine Q Kurihara; David B Camarillo; Jan B Pietzsch; Julian Gorodsky; Stefanos A Zenios; Rajiv Doshi; Christopher Shen; Uday N Kumar; Anurag Mairal; Jay Watkins; Richard L Popp; Paul J Wang; Josh Makower; Thomas M Krummel; Paul G Yock
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Bridging the gap between invention and commercialization in medical devices.

Authors:  Avik Som; Tauseef Charanya; Stephen W Linderman; Joshua S Siegel
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Innovation and entrepreneurship programs in US medical education: a landscape review and thematic analysis.

Authors:  Blake A Niccum; Arnab Sarker; Stephen J Wolf; Matthew J Trowbridge
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Learning the Language of Medical Device Innovation: A Longitudinal Interdisciplinary Elective for Medical Students.

Authors:  Lauren M Maloney; Mathew Hakimi; Thomas Hays; Joseph Adachi; Annie Chau; Brecken S Esper; Vasilios Koulouris; Preston Kung; Karl R Meier; Ryan S Schum; Sha Sha; Ada Wong; Ariel Wu; Wei Yin; Christopher R Page
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 7.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.