Literature DB >> 33536510

Reference values of electrographic and cardiac ultrasound parameters in Russian healthy children and adolescents.

Geraldine Landon1, Isabelle Denjoy2, Enora Clero3, Aleksandr Silenok4, Irina Kurnosova4, Andrey Butsenin4, Patrick Gourmelon3, Jean-Rene Jourdain5.   

Abstract

Between 2009 and 2013, a large cross-sectional study on the health consequences of the Chernobyl nuclear accident was performed in the contaminated and uncontaminated territories of the Bryansk Oblast (Russian Federation). The objective of this work was to confirm or refute a possible association between childhood cardiac arrhythmia and a chronic exposure to caesium-137. As part of this study, a large number of electrocardiographic and cardiac ultrasound parameters were collected from 18,152 children aged 2-18 years including 12,512 healthy ones not contaminated with caesium-137. It seemed therefore relevant for us to share in a second publication these medical data based on healthy and uncontaminated children with the scientific community because of the large quantities and the limited availability of such kind of data. In the present study, relating to electrocardiographic parameters, the measurements performed fully reflect the expected evolution of the paediatric electrocardiogram between 5 and 18 years of age. Thus, the median values were generally quite close to those available in the literature. In contrast, differences in the 2nd and 98th percentiles were notable and could be explained in particular by the type of equipment used, the number of subjects included in the study and racial disparities. As for echocardiographic parameters, the evolution of the measured values in age groups is consistent with what was expected considering factors such as growth. In comparison with other scientific studies that have investigated these echocardiographic parameters, some differences by age groups have been identified. The ethnic factor truly appears to be a relevant feature to consider. In view of the results, it appeared essential to the authors to approach the methodological conditions of the scientific studies already published on the topic to be truly comparable and thus to provide a reliable answer on a topic for which real expectations in terms of medical care are required.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536510     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82314-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  14 in total

1.  New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram.

Authors:  P R Rijnbeek; M Witsenburg; E Schrama; J Hess; J A Kors
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Guidelines and standards for performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Wyman W Lai; Tal Geva; Girish S Shirali; Peter C Frommelt; Richard A Humes; Michael M Brook; Ricardo H Pignatelli; Jack Rychik
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Electrocardiographic reference ranges derived from 79,743 ambulatory subjects.

Authors:  Jay W Mason; Douglas J Ramseth; Dennis O Chanter; Thomas E Moon; Daniel B Goodman; Boaz Mendzelevski
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  The effect of age and gender on the electrocardiogram in children.

Authors:  Evren Semizel; Bülent Oztürk; Ozlem M Bostan; Ergün Cil; Bülent Ediz
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.093

5.  Normal values of the ventricular gradient and QRS-T angle, derived from the pediatric electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Vivian P Kamphuis; Nico A Blom; Erik W van Zwet; Sumche Man; Arend D J Ten Harkel; Arie C Maan; Cees A Swenne
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.

Authors:  D J Sahn; A DeMaria; J Kisslo; A Weyman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Study on ECG in the Adolescent.

Authors:  Hung-Chi Lue; Mei-Hwan Wu; Jou-Kou Wang; Min-Tai Lin; Chun-Wei Lu; Shuenn-Nan Chiu; Chun-An Chen; En-Ting Wu; Ching-Chia Wang; Chun-Min Fu; Wei-Chien Tseng; Wei-Hsuan Chang; Meng-Chang Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  The electrocardiogram of the neonate and infant.

Authors:  Konrad Brockmeier; Rewa Nazal; Narayanswami Sreeram
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 1.438

9.  Heart rate variability in infants, children and young adults.

Authors:  J P Finley; S T Nugent
Journal:  J Auton Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-02-09

10.  Echocardiographic reference ranges in older children and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Edith D Majonga; Andrea M Rehman; Grace McHugh; Hilda A Mujuru; Kusum Nathoo; Mohammad S Patel; Shungu Munyati; Jon O Odland; Katharina Kranzer; Juan P Kaski; Rashida A Ferrand
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.