Changhong Wang1, Michelle Patriquin2,3,4, Ashkan Vaziri5, Bijan Najafi6. 1. Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 2. The Menniger Clinic, Houston, Texas, USA. 3. Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 4. Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 5. The BioSensics LLC, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA, najafi.bijan@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Concern about falling is a prevalent worry among community-dwelling older adults and may contribute to a decline in physical and mental health. This study aimed to examine the association between mobility performance and concern about falling. METHODS: Older adults aged 65 years and older, with Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥24, and ambulatory (with or without the assistive device) were included. Concern about falling was evaluated with Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) scores. Participants with high concern about falling were identified using the cutoff of FES-I ≥23. Participants' motor capacity was assessed in standardized walking tests under single- and dual-task conditions. Participants' mobility performance was measured based on a 48-h trunk accelerometry signal from a wearable pendant sensor. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed at participant characteristics across groups with different levels of concern about falling (low: N = 64, age = 76.3 ± 7.2 years, female = 46%; high: N = 59, age = 79.3 ± 9.1 years, female = 47%), after propensity matching with BMI, age, depression, and cognition. With adjustment of motor capacity (stride velocity and stride length under single- and dual-task walking conditions), participants with high concern about falling had significantly poorer mobility performance than those with low concern about falling, including lower walking quantity (walking bouts, steps and time per day, and walking bout average, walking bout variability, and longest walking bout, p ≤ 0.013), and poorer daily-life gait (stride velocity and gait variability, p ≤ 0.023), and poorer walking quality (frontal gait symmetry, and trunk acceleration and velocity intensity, p ≤ 0.041). The selected mobility performance metrics (daily steps and frontal gait symmetry) could significantly contribute to identifying older adults with high concern about falling (p ≤ 0.042), having better model performance (p = 0.036) than only walking quantity (daily steps) with adjustment of confounding effects from the motor capacity (stride length under dual-task walking condition). CONCLUSION: There is an association between mobility performance and concern about falling in older adults. Mobility performance metrics can serve as predictors to identify older adults with high concern about falling, potentially providing digital biomarkers for clinicians to remotely track older adults' change of concern about falling via applications of remote patient monitoring.
INTRODUCTION: Concern about falling is a prevalent worry among community-dwelling older adults and may contribute to a decline in physical and mental health. This study aimed to examine the association between mobility performance and concern about falling. METHODS: Older adults aged 65 years and older, with Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥24, and ambulatory (with or without the assistive device) were included. Concern about falling was evaluated with Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) scores. Participants with high concern about falling were identified using the cutoff of FES-I ≥23. Participants' motor capacity was assessed in standardized walking tests under single- and dual-task conditions. Participants' mobility performance was measured based on a 48-h trunk accelerometry signal from a wearable pendant sensor. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed at participant characteristics across groups with different levels of concern about falling (low: N = 64, age = 76.3 ± 7.2 years, female = 46%; high: N = 59, age = 79.3 ± 9.1 years, female = 47%), after propensity matching with BMI, age, depression, and cognition. With adjustment of motor capacity (stride velocity and stride length under single- and dual-task walking conditions), participants with high concern about falling had significantly poorer mobility performance than those with low concern about falling, including lower walking quantity (walking bouts, steps and time per day, and walking bout average, walking bout variability, and longest walking bout, p ≤ 0.013), and poorer daily-life gait (stride velocity and gait variability, p ≤ 0.023), and poorer walking quality (frontal gait symmetry, and trunk acceleration and velocity intensity, p ≤ 0.041). The selected mobility performance metrics (daily steps and frontal gait symmetry) could significantly contribute to identifying older adults with high concern about falling (p ≤ 0.042), having better model performance (p = 0.036) than only walking quantity (daily steps) with adjustment of confounding effects from the motor capacity (stride length under dual-task walking condition). CONCLUSION: There is an association between mobility performance and concern about falling in older adults. Mobility performance metrics can serve as predictors to identify older adults with high concern about falling, potentially providing digital biomarkers for clinicians to remotely track older adults' change of concern about falling via applications of remote patient monitoring.
Authors: G A R Zijlstra; J C M van Haastregt; J Th M van Eijk; E van Rossum; P A Stalenhoef; G I J M Kempen Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2007-03-22 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Jane A Painter; Leslie Allison; Puneet Dhingra; Justin Daughtery; Kira Cogdill; Leonard G Trujillo Journal: Am J Occup Ther Date: 2012 Mar-Apr
Authors: Bijan Najafi; Kamiar Aminian; Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu; François Loew; Christophe J Büla; Philippe Robert Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Carl-Philipp Jansen; Nima Toosizadeh; M Jane Mohler; Bijan Najafi; Christopher Wendel; Michael Schwenk Journal: Eur Rev Aging Phys Act Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 3.878