Literature DB >> 33534862

Hospital discharge data is not accurate enough to monitor the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage.

Diana Walther1, Patricia Halfon1, Romain Tanzer2, Bernard Burnand1, Moira Robertson3, Yvan Vial4, David Desseauve4, Marie-Annick Le Pogam1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Therefore, cumulative incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage are commonly monitored within and compared across maternity hospitals or countries for obstetrical safety improvement. These indicators are usually based on hospital discharge data though their accuracy is seldom assessed. We aimed to measure postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage using electronic health records and hospital discharge data separately and compare the detection accuracy of these methods to manual chart review, and to examine the temporal trends in cumulative incidence of these potentially avoidable adverse outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed routinely collected data of 7904 singleton deliveries from a large Swiss university hospital for a three year period (2014-2016). We identified postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage in electronic health records by text mining discharge letters and operative reports and calculating drop in hemoglobin from laboratory tests. Diagnostic and procedure codes were used to identify cases in hospital discharge data. A sample of 334 charts was reviewed manually to provide a reference-standard and evaluate the accuracy of the other detection methods.
RESULTS: Sensitivities of detection algorithms based on electronic health records and hospital discharge data were 95.2% (95% CI: 92.6% 97.8%) and 38.2% (33.3% to 43.0%), respectively for postpartum hemorrhage, and 87.5% (85.2% to 89.8%) and 36.2% (26.3% to 46.1%) for severe postpartum hemorrhage. Postpartum hemorrhage cumulative incidence based on electronic health records decreased from 15.6% (13.1% to 18.2%) to 8.5% (6.7% to 10.5%) from the beginning of 2014 to the end of 2016, with an average of 12.5% (11.8% to 13.3%). The cumulative incidence of severe postpartum hemorrhage remained at approximately 4% (3.5% to 4.4%). Hospital discharge data-based algorithms provided significantly underestimated incidences.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital discharge data is not accurate enough to assess the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at hospital or national level. Instead, automated algorithms based on structured and textual data from electronic health records should be considered, as they provide accurate and timely estimates for monitoring and improvement in obstetrical safety. Furthermore, they have the potential to better code for postpartum hemorrhage thus improving hospital reimbursement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33534862      PMCID: PMC7857548          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  32 in total

1.  Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma.

Authors:  Richard Lilford; Mohammed A Mohammed; David Spiegelhalter; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Trends in postpartum hemorrhage: United States, 1994-2006.

Authors:  William M Callaghan; Elena V Kuklina; Cynthia J Berg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Guillermo Carroli; Cristina Cuesta; Edgardo Abalos; A Metin Gulmezoglu
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 5.237

5.  Pictorial blood loss assessment chart in the evaluation of heavy menstrual bleeding: diagnostic accuracy compared to alkaline hematin.

Authors:  Mahmoud S Zakherah; Gamal H Sayed; Sherif A El-Nashar; Mamdouh M Shaaban
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Length of hospital stay, obstetric conditions at childbirth, and maternal readmission: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Maureen Heaman; Michael S Kramer; Kitaw Demissie; Shi Wu Wen; Sylvie Marcoux
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Accuracy of international classification of diseases, ninth revision, codes for postpartum hemorrhage among women undergoing cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Alexander J Butwick; Eileen M Walsh; Michael Kuzniewicz; Sherian X Li; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Major obstetric hemorrhage: Patients' perspective on the quality of care.

Authors:  Suzan M de Visser; Christian A Kirchner; Bianca G J van der Velden; Alexander C de Wit; Anneke Dijkman; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Johanna M Middeldorp; Desirée Moonen-Delarue; Jeroen van Dillen; Frank P H A Vandenbussche; Marlies E Hulscher; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Mallory D Woiski; Rosella P M G Hermens
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Trends in postpartum hemorrhage from 2000 to 2009: a population-based study.

Authors:  Azar Mehrabadi; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Lily Lee; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage, 2003-2011.

Authors:  Jane B Ford; Jillian A Patterson; Sean K M Seeho; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.