Literature DB >> 29377131

Accuracy of international classification of diseases, ninth revision, codes for postpartum hemorrhage among women undergoing cesarean delivery.

Alexander J Butwick1, Eileen M Walsh2, Michael Kuzniewicz2, Sherian X Li2, Gabriel J Escobar2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) codes for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is vital for reaching valid conclusions about the epidemiology of PPH. Our primary objectives were to assess the performance characteristics of ICD-9 PPH codes against a reference standard using estimated blood loss (EBL) among a cohort undergoing Cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed maternal discharge and EBL data from women who underwent Cesarean delivery at Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities between 2010 and 2013. We defined PPH as an EBL of at least 1000 mL. In a secondary analysis, ICD-9 performance characteristics were assessed using an EBL of at least 1500 mL to classify severe PPH.
RESULTS: We identified 35,614 hospitalizations for Cesarean delivery. Using EBL of at least 1000 mL as the "gold standard," PPH codes had a sensitivity of 27.8%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 74.5%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 80.9%. The prevalence of a PPH code (9%) was lower than the prevalence using a blood loss of at least 1000 mL (24%). Using a reference standard of EBL of at least 1500 mL, PPH codes had a sensitivity of 61.7%, specificity of 93.8%, PPV of 34.2%, and NPV of 97.9%.
CONCLUSION: PPH ICD-9 codes have high specificity, moderately high PPVs and NPVs, and low sensitivity. An EBL of at least 1500 mL as a reference standard has higher sensitivity. Our findings suggest that, for women undergoing Cesarean delivery, quality improvement efforts are needed to enhance PPH ICD-9 coding accuracy in administrative data sets.
© 2018 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29377131      PMCID: PMC5893374          DOI: 10.1111/trf.14498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  30 in total

1.  The epidemiology of postpartum hemorrhage in a large, nationwide sample of deliveries.

Authors:  Brian T Bateman; Mitchell F Berman; Laura E Riley; Lisa R Leffert
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Irene Stafford; Gary A Dildy; Steven L Clark; Michael A Belfort
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  William M Callaghan; Andreea A Creanga; Elena V Kuklina
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Risks for peroperative excessive blood loss in cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Toril Kolås; Pål Øian; Finn Egil Skjeldestad
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Blood loss after cesarean delivery: a registry-based study in Norway, 1999-2008.

Authors:  Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Pål Oian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Risk-adjusting hospital inpatient mortality using automated inpatient, outpatient, and laboratory databases.

Authors:  Gabriel J Escobar; John D Greene; Peter Scheirer; Marla N Gardner; David Draper; Patricia Kipnis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Blood transfusion during pregnancy, birth, and the postnatal period.

Authors:  Jillian A Patterson; Christine L Roberts; Jennifer R Bowen; David O Irving; James P Isbister; Jonathan M Morris; Jane B Ford
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Patterns and predictors of severe postpartum anemia after Cesarean section.

Authors:  Alexander J Butwick; Eileen M Walsh; Michael Kuzniewicz; Sherian X Li; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  How accurate is the reporting of obstetric haemorrhage in hospital discharge data? A validation study.

Authors:  Samantha J Lain; Christine L Roberts; Ruth M Hadfield; Jane C Bell; Jonathan M Morris
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.100

View more
  5 in total

1.  A principled framework for phenotyping postpartum hemorrhage across multiple levels of severity.

Authors:  Matthew Oberhardt; Alexander M Friedman; Rimma Perotte; Jean-Ju Sheen; Alan Kessler; David K Vawdrey; Robert Green; Mary E D'Alton; Dena Goffman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

2.  Accuracy of identifying hospital acquired venous thromboembolism by administrative coding: implications for big data and machine learning research.

Authors:  Tiffany Pellathy; Melissa Saul; Gilles Clermont; Artur W Dubrawski; Michael R Pinsky; Marilyn Hravnak
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 1.977

3.  Hospital discharge data is not accurate enough to monitor the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage.

Authors:  Diana Walther; Patricia Halfon; Romain Tanzer; Bernard Burnand; Moira Robertson; Yvan Vial; David Desseauve; Marie-Annick Le Pogam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The association between postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum depression: A Swedish national register-based study.

Authors:  Can Liu; Alexander Butwick; Anna Sand; Anna-Karin Wikström; Jonathan M Snowden; Olof Stephansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A comprehensive digital phenotype for postpartum hemorrhage.

Authors:  Amanda B Zheutlin; Luciana Vieira; Ryan A Shewcraft; Shilong Li; Zichen Wang; Emilio Schadt; Yu-Han Kao; Susan Gross; Siobhan M Dolan; Joanne Stone; Eric Schadt; Li Li
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.