Literature DB >> 33534357

Barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.

Wendy Ng1, Helen Slater1, Cobie Starcevich1, Anthony Wright1, Tim Mitchell1,2, Darren Beales1,2.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: A substantial evidence-practice gap exists between healthcare professionals learning about the biopsychosocial model of pain and adopting this model in clinical practice. This review aimed to explore the barriers and enablers that influence the application of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain in practice, from the clinicians' perspective. Qualitative evidence synthesis was used. Four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) were searched. Primary qualitative studies were included if they investigated the experiences of primary healthcare professionals using a biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain care in outpatient settings or their perceptions towards biopsychosocial-oriented clinical practice guidelines. After screening 6571 abstracts, 77 full-text articles were retrieved. Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria, reporting the experiences of 413 healthcare professionals (including general practitioners, physiotherapists, and others) spanning 11 countries. Three metathemes were identified that impact the adoption of the biopsychosocial model across the whole of health: (1) at the microlevel, healthcare professionals' personal factors, knowledge and skills, and their misconceptions of clinical practice guidelines, perception of patients' factors, and time; (2) at the mesolevel, clinical practice guideline formulation, community factors, funding models, health service provision, resourcing issues, and workforce training issues; and (3) at the macrolevel, health policy, organizational, and social factors. Synthesized data revealed multilevel (whole-of-health) barriers and enablers to health professionals adopting a biopsychosocial model of pain into practice. Awareness of these multilevel factors may help inform preimplementation preparedness and support more effective implementation of the biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain into clinical practice.
Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33534357     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  4 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary on Vader et al.1.

Authors:  Sinead Dufour
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  "Listen to me, learn from me": a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care.

Authors:  Helen Slater; Joanne E Jordan; Peter B O'Sullivan; Robert Schütze; Roger Goucke; Jason Chua; Allyson Browne; Ben Horgan; Simone De Morgan; Andrew M Briggs
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 7.926

3.  The development of a stakeholder-endorsed national strategic plan for advancing pain education across Canadian physiotherapy programs.

Authors:  Timothy H Wideman; Geoffrey Bostick; Jordan Miller; Aliki Thomas; André Bussières; David Walton; Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Lisa Carlesso; Judith Hunter; Kadija Perreault; Barbara Shay
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Treating persistent pain after breast cancer: practice gaps and future directions.

Authors:  An De Groef; Mira Meeus; Lauren C Heathcote; Louise Wiles; Mark Catley; Anna Vogelzang; Ian Olver; William B Runciman; Peter Hibbert; Lore Dams; Bart Morlion; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.442

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.