Shreya P Trivedi1,2, Zoe Kopp3, Paul N Williams4, Derek Hupp5, Nick Gowen6, Leora I Horwitz7, Mark D Schwartz7. 1. Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. strived1@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 550 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. strived1@bidmc.harvard.edu. 3. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. 7. Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Safely and effectively discharging a patient from the hospital requires working within a multidisciplinary team. However, little is known about how perceptions of responsibility among the team impact discharge communication practices. OBJECTIVE: Our study attempts to understand residents' perceptions of who is primarily responsible for discharge education, how these perceptions affect their own reported communication with patients, and how residents envision improving multidisciplinary communication around discharges. DESIGN: A multi-institutional cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine (IM) residents from seven US residency programs at academic medical centers were invited to participate between March and May 2019, via email of an electronic link to the survey. MAIN MEASURES: Data collected included resident perception of who on the multidisciplinary team is primarily responsible for discharge communication, their own reported discharge communication practices, and open-ended comments on ways discharge multidisciplinary team communication could be improved. KEY RESULTS: Of the 613 resident responses (63% response rate), 35% reported they were unsure which member of the multidisciplinary team is primarily responsible for discharge education. Residents who believed it was either the intern's or the resident's primary responsibility had 4.28 (95% CI, 2.51-7.30) and 3.01 (95% CI, 1.66-5.71) times the odds, respectively, of reporting doing discharge communication practices frequently compared to those who were not sure who was primarily responsible. To improve multidisciplinary discharge communication, residents called for the following among team members: (1) clarifying roles and responsibilities for communication with patients, (2) setting expectations for communication among multidisciplinary team members, and (3) redefining culture around discharges. CONCLUSIONS: Residents report a lack of understanding of who is responsible for discharge education. This diffusion of ownership impacts how much residents invest in patient education, with more perceived responsibility associated with more frequent discharge communication.
BACKGROUND: Safely and effectively discharging a patient from the hospital requires working within a multidisciplinary team. However, little is known about how perceptions of responsibility among the team impact discharge communication practices. OBJECTIVE: Our study attempts to understand residents' perceptions of who is primarily responsible for discharge education, how these perceptions affect their own reported communication with patients, and how residents envision improving multidisciplinary communication around discharges. DESIGN: A multi-institutional cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine (IM) residents from seven US residency programs at academic medical centers were invited to participate between March and May 2019, via email of an electronic link to the survey. MAIN MEASURES: Data collected included resident perception of who on the multidisciplinary team is primarily responsible for discharge communication, their own reported discharge communication practices, and open-ended comments on ways discharge multidisciplinary team communication could be improved. KEY RESULTS: Of the 613 resident responses (63% response rate), 35% reported they were unsure which member of the multidisciplinary team is primarily responsible for discharge education. Residents who believed it was either the intern's or the resident's primary responsibility had 4.28 (95% CI, 2.51-7.30) and 3.01 (95% CI, 1.66-5.71) times the odds, respectively, of reporting doing discharge communication practices frequently compared to those who were not sure who was primarily responsible. To improve multidisciplinary discharge communication, residents called for the following among team members: (1) clarifying roles and responsibilities for communication with patients, (2) setting expectations for communication among multidisciplinary team members, and (3) redefining culture around discharges. CONCLUSIONS: Residents report a lack of understanding of who is responsible for discharge education. This diffusion of ownership impacts how much residents invest in patient education, with more perceived responsibility associated with more frequent discharge communication.
Entities:
Keywords:
discharge communication; multidisciplinary team; transitions of care
Authors: Luke O Hansen; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Tina Budnitz; Eric Howell; Lakshmi Halasyamani; Greg Maynard; Arpana Vidyarthi; Eric A Coleman; Mark V Williams Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Sara Daliri; Charlotte L Bekker; Bianca M Buurman; Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer; Bart J F van den Bemt; Fatma Karapinar-Çarkit Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Carrie H K Yam; Eliza L Y Wong; Annie W L Cheung; Frank W K Chan; Fiona Y Y Wong; Eng-kiong Yeoh Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 2.655