Literature DB >> 33532269

3D-segmentation and characterization of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue on CT: influence of contrast medium and contrast phase.

Robin F Gohmann1,2, Sebastian Gottschling1, Patrick Seitz1, Batuhan Temiz2, Christian Krieghoff1, Christian Lücke1, Matthias Horn3, Matthias Gutberlet1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue as part of body composition analysis may serve as a powerful biomarker. Validation of segmented adipose tissue and correlation to clinical data has been performed on non-enhanced scans (NES). As many patients require a contrast enhanced scan (CES) for other aspects of clinical decision making, the utility of CES for body composition analysis would be most useful. Therefore, we analyzed the influence of iodinated contrast medium (ICM) and contrast phase on the characterization and segmentation of adipose tissue.
METHODS: Exams of 31 patients undergoing multi-phasic CT at identical scan settings containing an NES were retrospectively included. In addition to NES, patients received an arterial (ART) (n=23), portal-venous (PVN) (n=10), and/or venous scan (VEN) (n=31) after intravenous injection of 90 mL ICM. Density and volume of adipose tissue were quantified semi-automatically with thresholds between -190 HU and -30 HU and recorded separately for visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Density and volume of total adipose tissue (TAT) were computed. For conversion of values from CES into those of NES regression analyses were performed and tested.
RESULTS: Density of adipose tissue increased after application of ICM more on later scans (VEN ≈ PVN > ART) and more markedly in VAT than SAT (VAT > TAT > SAT). Except in SAT on ART, all changes were significant (P<0.001). Measured volume of adipose tissue decreased on all CES (VEN ≈ PVN > ART) (P<0.001), but only reached statistical significance for VAT and TAT (VAT > TAT) on all CES (P<0.05). Density and volume in CES correlate extremely well with NES and may be calculated from one another [root-mean-square error (RMSE): <6 HU; <0.85 dm3].
CONCLUSIONS: Density and volume of segmented adipose tissue are altered by the injection of ICM in differing degrees between compartments and contrast phases. However, as the effect of ICM is fairly constant for a given compartment and contrast phase, values may be converted into those of NES with relative precession. This conversion allows body composition analysis to be carried out also in contrast enhanced CT examinations, e.g., for risk stratification and the comparison of the obtained results to previous studies. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; adipose tissue; computed tomography; contrast media; segmentation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33532269      PMCID: PMC7779906          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  23 in total

1.  Sub-cutaneous Fat Mass measured on multislice computed tomography of pretreatment PET/CT is a prognostic factor of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated by nivolumab.

Authors:  Geoffrey Popinat; Stéphanie Cousse; Lucas Goldfarb; Stéphanie Becker; Isabelle Gardin; Mathieu Salaün; Sébastien Thureau; Pierre Vera; Florian Guisier; Pierre Decazes
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Adipose tissue volume determinations in women by computed tomography: technical considerations.

Authors:  H Kvist; L Sjöström; U Tylén
Journal:  Int J Obes       Date:  1986

3.  Body composition measurement using computed tomography: Does the phase of the scan matter?

Authors:  Katie E Rollins; Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi; Amir Awwad; Ian A Macdonald; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  Body composition evaluation with computed tomography: Contrast media and slice thickness cause methodological errors.

Authors:  Fabian Morsbach; Yi-Hua Zhang; Lena Martin; Catarina Lindqvist; Torkel Brismar
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.008

5.  Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography.

Authors:  G A Borkan; S G Gerzof; A H Robbins; D E Hults; C K Silbert; J E Silbert
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Comparison of anthropometric, area- and volume-based assessment of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes using multi-detector computed tomography.

Authors:  P Maurovich-Horvat; J Massaro; C S Fox; F Moselewski; C J O'Donnell; U Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Establishing computed tomography-defined visceral fat area thresholds for use in obesity-related cancer research.

Authors:  Suzanne L Doyle; Anne Marie Bennett; Claire L Donohoe; Ann Marie Mongan; Julia M Howard; Fiona E Lithander; Graham P Pidgeon; John V Reynolds; Joanne Lysaght
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Determination of total adipose tissue and body fat in women by computed tomography, 40K, and tritium.

Authors:  L Sjöström; H Kvist; A Cederblad; U Tylén
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-06

9.  Prognostic Impact of Computed Tomography-Derived Abdominal Fat Area on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Taishi Okuno; Keita Koseki; Toru Nakanishi; Kai Ninomiya; Daijiro Tomii; Tetsu Tanaka; Yu Sato; Akira Osanai; Kei Sato; Hideki Koike; Kazuyuki Yahagi; Satoru Kishi; Kota Komiyama; Jiro Aoki; Motoi Yokozuka; Sumio Miura; Kengo Tanabe
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.993

10.  Malnutrition and sarcopenia predict post-liver transplantation outcomes independently of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score.

Authors:  Maria Kalafateli; Konstantinos Mantzoukis; Yan Choi Yau; Ali O Mohammad; Simran Arora; Susana Rodrigues; Marie de Vos; Kassiani Papadimitriou; Douglas Thorburn; James O'Beirne; David Patch; Massimo Pinzani; Marsha Y Morgan; Banwari Agarwal; Dominic Yu; Andrew K Burroughs; Emmanuel A Tsochatzis
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 12.910

View more
  3 in total

1.  Segmentation and characterization of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue on CT with and without contrast medium: influence of 2D- and 3D-segmentation.

Authors:  Robin F Gohmann; Batuhan Temiz; Patrick Seitz; Sebastian Gottschling; Christian Lücke; Christian Krieghoff; Christian Blume; Matthias Horn; Matthias Gutberlet
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-10

2.  Body composition assessment: comparison of quantitative values between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

Authors:  Chiara Zaffina; Rolf Wyttenbach; Alberto Pagnamenta; Rosario Francesco Grasso; Matteo Biroli; Filippo Del Grande; Stefania Rizzo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

3.  Healthy US population reference values for CT visceral fat measurements and the impact of IV contrast, HU range, and spinal levels.

Authors:  Brian A Derstine; Sven A Holcombe; Brian E Ross; Nicholas C Wang; Stewart C Wang; Grace L Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.