PURPOSE: Cross-sectional imaging may enable accurate localization and quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue. The reproducibility of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT)-based volumetric quantification of abdominal adipose tissue and the ability to depict age- and gender-related characteristics of adipose tissue deposition have not been reported. METHODS: We evaluated a random subset of 100 Caucasian subjects (age range: 37-83 years; 49% women) of the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort who underwent MDCT scanning. Two readers measured subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes (SAV and VAV; cm(3)) and areas (SAA and VAA; cm(2)) as well as abdominal sagital diameter (SD) and waist circumference (WC). RESULTS: Inter-reader reproducibility was excellent (relative difference: -0.34+/-0.52% for SAV and 0.59+/-0.93% for VAV, intra-class correlation (ICC)=0.99 each). The mean SAA/VAA ratio was significantly different from the mean SAV/VAV ratio (2.0+/-1.2 vs 1.7+/-0.9; P<0.001). The ratio of SAV/VAV was only weakly inversely associated with SD (ICC=-0.32, P=0.01) and not significantly associated with WC (ICC=-0.14, P=0.14) or body mass index (ICC=-0.17, P=0.09). The mean SAV/VAV ratio was significantly different between participants <60 vs >60 years (1.9+/-1.0 vs 1.5+/-0.7; P<0.001) and between men and women (1.2+/-0.5 vs 2.2+/-0.9; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MDCT-based volumetric quantification of abdominal adipose tissue is highly reproducible. In addition, our results suggest that volumetric measurements can depict age- and gender-related differences of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue deposition. Further research is warranted to assess whether volumetric measurements may substantially improve the predictive value of obesity measures for insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus and other diseases.
PURPOSE: Cross-sectional imaging may enable accurate localization and quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue. The reproducibility of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT)-based volumetric quantification of abdominal adipose tissue and the ability to depict age- and gender-related characteristics of adipose tissue deposition have not been reported. METHODS: We evaluated a random subset of 100 Caucasian subjects (age range: 37-83 years; 49% women) of the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort who underwent MDCT scanning. Two readers measured subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes (SAV and VAV; cm(3)) and areas (SAA and VAA; cm(2)) as well as abdominal sagital diameter (SD) and waist circumference (WC). RESULTS: Inter-reader reproducibility was excellent (relative difference: -0.34+/-0.52% for SAV and 0.59+/-0.93% for VAV, intra-class correlation (ICC)=0.99 each). The mean SAA/VAA ratio was significantly different from the mean SAV/VAV ratio (2.0+/-1.2 vs 1.7+/-0.9; P<0.001). The ratio of SAV/VAV was only weakly inversely associated with SD (ICC=-0.32, P=0.01) and not significantly associated with WC (ICC=-0.14, P=0.14) or body mass index (ICC=-0.17, P=0.09). The mean SAV/VAV ratio was significantly different between participants <60 vs >60 years (1.9+/-1.0 vs 1.5+/-0.7; P<0.001) and between men and women (1.2+/-0.5 vs 2.2+/-0.9; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MDCT-based volumetric quantification of abdominal adipose tissue is highly reproducible. In addition, our results suggest that volumetric measurements can depict age- and gender-related differences of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue deposition. Further research is warranted to assess whether volumetric measurements may substantially improve the predictive value of obesity measures for insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus and other diseases.
Authors: K Chughtai; Y Song; P Zhang; B Derstine; E Gatza; J Friedman; L Hully; C Inglis; S Goldstein; J Magenau; A Pawarode; P Reddy; M Riwes; G Yanik; S C Wang; S W Choi Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Aaron S Rickles; James C Iannuzzi; Oleg Mironov; Andrew-Paul Deeb; Abhiram Sharma; Fergal J Fleming; John R T Monson Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Michael T Osborne; Amorina Ishai; Basma Hammad; Brian Tung; Ying Wang; Amos Baruch; Zahi A Fayad; Jon T Giles; Janet Lo; Lisa M Shin; Steven K Grinspoon; Karestan C Koenen; Roger K Pitman; Ahmed Tawakol Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Joao Incio; Jennifer A Ligibel; Daniel T McManus; Priya Suboj; Keehoon Jung; Kosuke Kawaguchi; Matthias Pinter; Suboj Babykutty; Shan M Chin; Trupti D Vardam; Yuhui Huang; Nuh N Rahbari; Sylvie Roberge; Dannie Wang; Igor L Gomes-Santos; Stefan B Puchner; Christopher L Schlett; Udo Hoffmman; Marek Ancukiewicz; Sara M Tolaney; Ian E Krop; Dan G Duda; Yves Boucher; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ian S Rogers; Joseph M Massaro; Quynh A Truong; Amir A Mahabadi; Matthias F Kriegel; Caroline S Fox; George Thanassoulis; Eric M Isselbacher; Udo Hoffmann; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jill A Young; Shih-Jen Hwang; Mark J Sarnak; Udo Hoffmann; Joseph M Massaro; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 8.237