Literature DB >> 33531558

Environmental (e)RNA advances the reliability of eDNA by predicting its age.

Nathaniel T Marshall1, Henry A Vanderploeg2, Subba Rao Chaganti3.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has advanced conservation biology and biodiversity management. However, accurate estimation of age and origin of eDNA is complicated by particle transport and the presence of legacy genetic material, which can obscure accurate interpretation of eDNA detection and quantification. To understand the state of genomic material within the environment, we investigated the degradation relationships between (a) size of fragments (long vs short), (b) genomic origins (mitochondrial vs nuclear), (c) nucleic acids (eDNA vs eRNA), and (d) RNA types (messenger (m)RNA vs ribosomal (r)RNA) from non-indigenous Dreissena mussels. Initial concentrations of eRNA followed expected transcriptional trends, with rRNAs found at > 1000 × that of eDNA, and a mitosis-associated mRNA falling below detection limits within 24 h. Furthermore, the ratio of eRNA:eDNA significantly decreased throughout degradation, potentially providing an estimate for the age of genomic material. Thus, eRNA quantification can increase detection due to the high concentrations of rRNAs. Furthermore, it may improve interpretation of positive detections through the eRNA:eDNA ratio and/or by detecting low abundant mitosis-associated mRNAs that degrade within ~ 24 h.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33531558     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82205-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  33 in total

Review 1.  Are Environmental DNA Methods Ready for Aquatic Invasive Species Management?

Authors:  Adam J Sepulveda; Nanette M Nelson; Christopher L Jerde; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples.

Authors:  Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Claude Miaud; François Pompanon; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Estimating fish abundance and biomass from eDNA concentrations: variability among capture methods and environmental conditions.

Authors:  Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel; Maikel Rosabal; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity.

Authors:  Iliana Bista; Gary R Carvalho; Kerry Walsh; Mathew Seymour; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Delphine Lallias; Martin Christmas; Simon Creer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Controls on eDNA movement in streams: Transport, Retention, and Resuspension.

Authors:  Arial J Shogren; Jennifer L Tank; Elizabeth Andruszkiewicz; Brett Olds; Andrew R Mahon; Christopher L Jerde; Diogo Bolster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Water temperature-dependent degradation of environmental DNA and its relation to bacterial abundance.

Authors:  Satsuki Tsuji; Masayuki Ushio; Sho Sakurai; Toshifumi Minamoto; Hiroki Yamanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Environmental DNA allows upscaling spatial patterns of biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems.

Authors:  Luca Carraro; Elvira Mächler; Remo Wüthrich; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community.

Authors:  Anni Djurhuus; Collin J Closek; Ryan P Kelly; Kathleen J Pitz; Reiko P Michisaki; Hilary A Starks; Kristine R Walz; Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz; Emily Olesin; Katherine Hubbard; Enrique Montes; Daniel Otis; Frank E Muller-Karger; Francisco P Chavez; Alexandria B Boehm; Mya Breitbart
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information.

Authors:  Kristy Deiner; Emanuel A Fronhofer; Elvira Mächler; Jean-Claude Walser; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation.

Authors:  Didier Pont; Mathieu Rocle; Alice Valentini; Raphaël Civade; Pauline Jean; Anthony Maire; Nicolas Roset; Michael Schabuss; Horst Zornig; Tony Dejean
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  6 in total

1.  Can nuclear aquatic environmental DNA be a genetic marker for the accurate estimation of species abundance?

Authors:  Toshiaki S Jo; Kenji Tsuri; Hiroki Yamanaka
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-07-21

2.  Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments.

Authors:  Marissa S Giroux; Jay R Reichman; Troy Langknecht; Robert M Burgess; Kay T Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review.

Authors:  Pritam Banerjee; Kathryn A Stewart; Gobinda Dey; Caterina M Antognazza; Raju Kumar Sharma; Jyoti Prakash Maity; Santanu Saha; Hideyuki Doi; Natasha de Vere; Michael W Y Chan; Pin-Yun Lin; Hung-Chun Chao; Chien-Yen Chen
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  RNA allows identifying the consumption of carrion prey.

Authors:  Veronika Neidel; Daniela Sint; Corinna Wallinger; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 8.678

Review 5.  Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring.

Authors:  Magdalena Nagler; Sabine Marie Podmirseg; Judith Ascher-Jenull; Daniela Sint; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 8.678

Review 6.  Reinforcement of Environmental DNA Based Methods (Sensu Stricto) in Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation: A Review.

Authors:  Pritam Banerjee; Gobinda Dey; Caterina M Antognazza; Raju Kumar Sharma; Jyoti Prakash Maity; Michael W Y Chan; Yi-Hsun Huang; Pin-Yun Lin; Hung-Chun Chao; Chung-Ming Lu; Chien-Yen Chen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.