Literature DB >> 26946353

Estimating fish abundance and biomass from eDNA concentrations: variability among capture methods and environmental conditions.

Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel1, Maikel Rosabal2, Louis Bernatchez3.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) promises to ease noninvasive quantification of fish biomass or abundance, but its integration within conservation and fisheries management is currently limited by a lack of understanding of the influence of eDNA collection method and environmental conditions on eDNA concentrations in water samples. Water temperature is known to influence the metabolism of fish and consequently could strongly affect eDNA release rate. As water temperature varies in temperate regions (both seasonally and geographically), the unknown effect of water temperature on eDNA concentrations poses practical limitations on quantifying fish populations using eDNA from water samples. This study aimed to clarify how water temperature and the eDNA capture method alter the relationships between eDNA concentration and fish abundance/biomass. Water samples (1 L) were collected from 30 aquaria including triplicate of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 Brook Charr specimens at two different temperatures (7 °C and 14 °C). Water samples were filtered with five different types of filters. The eDNA concentration obtained by quantitative PCR (qPCR) varied significantly with fish abundance and biomass and types of filters (mixed-design ANOVA, P < 0.001). Results also show that fish released more eDNA in warm water than in cold water and that eDNA concentration better reflects fish abundance/biomass at high temperature. From a technical standpoint, higher levels of eDNA were captured with glass fibre (GF) filters than with mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters and support the importance of adequate filters to quantify fish abundance based on the eDNA method. This study supports the importance of including water temperature in fish abundance/biomass prediction models based on eDNA.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990qPCRzzm321990; conservation genetics; fish; salmonid; species detection; water sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26946353     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  33 in total

1.  Ballast Water Exchange and Invasion Risk Posed by Intracoastal Vessel Traffic: An Evaluation Using High Throughput Sequencing.

Authors:  John A Darling; John Martinson; Yunguo Gong; Sara Okum; Erik Pilgrim; Katrina M Pagenkopp Lohan; Katharine J Carney; Gregory M Ruiz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Using eDNA techniques to find the endangered big-headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum).

Authors:  Ivan P Y Lam; Yik-Hei Sung; Jonathan J Fong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Next-generation freshwater bioassessment: eDNA metabarcoding with a conserved metazoan primer reveals species-rich and reservoir-specific communities.

Authors:  Nicholas K M Lim; Ywee Chieh Tay; Amrita Srivathsan; Jonathan W T Tan; Jeffrey T B Kwik; Bilgenur Baloğlu; Rudolf Meier; Darren C J Yeo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity.

Authors:  Iliana Bista; Gary R Carvalho; Kerry Walsh; Mathew Seymour; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Delphine Lallias; Martin Christmas; Simon Creer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Detection of an endangered aquatic heteropteran using environmental DNA in a wetland ecosystem.

Authors:  Hideyuki Doi; Izumi Katano; Yusuke Sakata; Rio Souma; Toshihiro Kosuge; Mariko Nagano; Kousuke Ikeda; Koki Yano; Koji Tojo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.

Authors:  Izumi Katano; Ken Harada; Hideyuki Doi; Rio Souma; Toshifumi Minamoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distribution and seasonal differences in Pacific Lamprey and Lampetra spp eDNA across 18 Puget Sound watersheds.

Authors:  Carl O Ostberg; Dorothy M Chase; Michael C Hayes; Jeffrey J Duda
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks.

Authors:  Lu Shu; Arne Ludwig; Zuogang Peng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  An analytical framework for estimating aquatic species density from environmental DNA.

Authors:  Thierry Chambert; David S Pilliod; Caren S Goldberg; Hideyuki Doi; Teruhiko Takahara
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Seasonal variability in the persistence of dissolved environmental DNA (eDNA) in a marine system: The role of microbial nutrient limitation.

Authors:  Ian Salter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.