Literature DB >> 33531034

Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience.

M Wurm1, M Zyskowski1, F Greve1, A Gersing2, P Biberthaler1, C Kirchhoff3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Absence of cortical alignment in wedge-shaped and multifragmentary fractures (Fx) results in decreased fixation stability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome using 2.0- vs. 3.5-mm screws for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in dislocated, wedge-shaped or fragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients suffering from AO/OTA 15 2.A-C midshaft clavicle fractures were operatively treated between 2008 and 2018. 2.0- or 3.5-mm cortical screws were used to restore anatomic alignment in dislocated, wedge-shaped and fragmentary clavicle fractures. Data of radiologic outcome were collected until fracture consolidation was identified.
RESULTS: 80 consecutive patients with a mean age of 44.5 ± 16.3 years, who were operatively treated for dislocated midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled. 40 patients were treated using 2.0-mm and 40 patients using routine 3.5-mm cortical screws, respectively. Time to fracture consolidation was 12.8 ± 7.8 months. No mal- or non-unions occurred during routine follow-up until 18 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Restoring anatomic alignment in wedge or fragmentary clavicle fractures can ultimately be addressed using cortical screw augmentation. Both groups showed comparable results with respect to fracture reduction, fixation and stability as well as time to consolidation of the fracture, while the 2.0-mm screw diameter was associated with easier handling of small Fx fragments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Clavicle; Cortical; Fracture; Osteosynthesis; Plate; Screw

Year:  2021        PMID: 33531034     DOI: 10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Res        ISSN: 0949-2321            Impact factor:   2.175


  22 in total

1.  The importance of immediate total-body CT scanning.

Authors:  Stefan Huber-Wagner; Rolf Lefering; Karl-Georg Kanz; Peter Biberthaler; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Surgical fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Martijn H Hulsmans; Mark van Heijl; Roderick M Houwert; Bart J Burger; Egbert Jan M Verleisdonk; Dirk Jan Veeger; Olivier A van der Meijden
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  C M Robinson; E B Goudie; I R Murray; P J Jenkins; M A Ahktar; E O Read; C J Foster; K Clark; A J Brooksbank; A Arthur; M A Crowther; I Packham; T J Chesser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Risk factors for nonunion after nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle.

Authors:  I R Murray; C J Foster; A Eros; C M Robinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Trends in the Incidence of Clavicle Fractures and Surgical Repair in Sweden: 2001-2012.

Authors:  Tuomas T Huttunen; Antti P Launonen; Hans E Berg; Vesa Lepola; Li Felländer-Tsai; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Smoking status and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score are early predictors of symptomatic nonunion of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle.

Authors:  N D Clement; E B Goudie; A J Brooksbank; T J S Chesser; C M Robinson
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: the relevance of shortening and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Stefanos Lazarides; George Zafiropoulos
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Radiological and functional outcomes 2.7 years following conservatively treated completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Hendrik F S Fuglesang; Gunnar B Flugsrud; Per-Henrik Randsborg; Knut Stavem; Stein E Utvåg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Mid-term outcome following revision surgery of clavicular non- and malunion using anatomic locking compression plate and iliac crest bone graft.

Authors:  Marc Beirer; Ingo J Banke; Norbert Harrasser; Moritz Crönlein; Dominik Pförringer; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Moritz Crönlein; Markus Wurm; Marc Beirer; Michael Zyskowski; Christopher Völk; Arthur Schwarz; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.