Literature DB >> 26538266

Radiological and functional outcomes 2.7 years following conservatively treated completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Hendrik F S Fuglesang1,2, Gunnar B Flugsrud3, Per-Henrik Randsborg4, Knut Stavem4,5, Stein E Utvåg4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether all completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures require primary surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to elucidate the radiological and clinical outcomes after conservative treatment, and to identify subgroups at risk of an inferior outcome.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Level II trauma center. PATIENTS: Between 2005 and 2008, 122 patients were conservatively treated for a completely displaced midshaft clavicle fracture of whom 92 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Of these, 59 completed the study after a median of 2.7 years after the fracture (min-max, 1.1-4.9). INTERVENTION: The patients received the standard treatment administered at our institution at the time: nonsurgically with a sling without physiotherapy. Patients with painful nonunions were subsequently offered surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: At follow-up, the patients' Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the Constant scores were evaluated. Radiographs were taken at follow-up and compared to those taken acutely.
RESULTS: Nonunion was found in 9 of the 59 (15.3%) patients. Twenty-four (24%) patients reported a fair-to-poor DASH score (i.e. >20). Patients with fractures that were vertically displaced by more than 100% (one bone width) were significantly less satisfied than those with fractures vertically displaced at 100% (p = 0.04). Initial shortening of more than 15 mm was not associated with a worse outcome or nonunion. The odds ratio of developing a nonunion increased with age (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: By treating completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures conservatively with a sling and offering plate fixation for eventual painful nonunions, we found a 24% risk of a fair or poor clinical result with a DASH score over 20. A vertical displacement of more than 100 % between the main fragments on the initial radiograph was associated with an inferior clinical outcome in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavicle; Conservative treatment; Constant score; DASH score; Displaced; Fracture; Midshaft; Nonunion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26538266     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2354-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  11 in total

1.  S-shaped titanium endomedullary nail reduces telescoping of comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures.

Authors:  Ronny Langenhan; Stefanie Bushuven; Niklas Reimers; Axel Probst
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

2.  [Clavicular fractures : Diagnostics, management and treatment].

Authors:  M Wurm; M Beirer; P Biberthaler; C Kirchhoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Woltz; Alysia Sengab; Pieta Krijnen; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Variation in management of humeral and clavicular shaft fractures amongst fellowship trained orthopedic traumatologists.

Authors:  Behnam Sharareh; Christopher Perkins
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Measurement of midshaft clavicle vertical displacement is not influenced by radiographic projection.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Aman Chopra; Zachary M Working; Ashraf N El Naga; Nico Verdonschot; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-02-13

6.  Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  M Wurm; M Zyskowski; F Greve; A Gersing; P Biberthaler; C Kirchhoff
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  Long-term outcomes of initially conservatively treated midshaft clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Gwan Bum Lee; Hyojune Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2021-02-18

8.  Surgical treatment, complications, reoperations, and healthcare costs among patients with clavicle fracture in England.

Authors:  Simone Wolf; Abhishek S Chitnis; Anandan Manoranjith; Mollie Vanderkarr; Javier Quintana Plaza; Laura V Gador; Chantal E Holy; Charisse Sparks; Simon M Lambert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Peter van Schie; Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-20

10.  Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Arnoud van Geene; Udo Gundlach; Abel Wei; Nico Verdonschot; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.