Literature DB >> 33530698

Shared Decision-Making for Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Rationale and Design of a Nationwide Dissemination and Implementation Project.

Jocelyn S Thompson1, Monica D Fitzgerald1, Larry A Allen1,2, Colleen K McIlvennan1,2, Russell E Glasgow1, Matthew Wynia3, Megan A Morris1,4, John Beilenson5, Chris Gherst5, Dan D Matlock1,6,7.   

Abstract

Background The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has become a common medical option for patients with end-stage heart failure. Although patients' chances of survival may increase with an LVAD compared with medical therapy, the LVAD poses many risks and requires major lifestyle changes, thus making it a complex medical decision. Our prior work found that a decision aid for LVADs significantly increased decision quality for both patients and caregivers and was successfully implemented at 6 LVAD programs. Methods In follow-up, we are conducting a nationwide dissemination and implementation project, with the goal of implementing the decision aid at as many of the 176 LVAD programs in the United States as possible. Guided by the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations, the project consists of 4 phases: (1) building a network; (2) promoting adoption; (3) supporting implementation; and (4) encouraging maintenance. Developing an LVAD network of contacts occurs by using a national baseline survey of LVAD clinicians, existing professional relationships, and an internet-based strategy. A suite of resources targeted to promote adoption and support implementation of the decision aid into standard LVAD education processes are provided to the network. Evaluation is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework, where clinician and patient surveys and qualitative interviews determine the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance achieved. Conclusions This project is a true dissemination study in that it targets the entire population of LVAD programs in the United States and is unique in its use of social marketing principles to promote adoption and implementation. The implementation plan is intended to serve as a test case and model for dissemination and implementation of other evidence-based decision support aids and strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregiver; diffusion of innovations; heart-assist devices heart failure; implementation science; maintenance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33530698      PMCID: PMC7887063          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  34 in total

1.  Minimal intervention needed for change: definition, use, and value for improving health and health research.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Lawrence Fisher; Lisa A Strycker; Danielle Hessler; Deborah J Toobert; Diane K King; Tom Jacobs
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Perspectives from mechanical circulatory support coordinators on the pre-implantation decision process for destination therapy left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock; Madhav P Narayan; Carolyn Nowels; Jocelyn S Thompson; Anne Cannon; William J Bradley; Larry A Allen
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  Consequences of health trends and medical innovation for the future elderly.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Baoping Shang; Jayanta Bhattacharya; Alan M Garber; Michael Hurd; Geoffrey F Joyce; Darius N Lakdawalla; Constantijn Panis; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-fourth Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2017; Focus Theme: Allograft ischemic time.

Authors:  Lars H Lund; Kiran K Khush; Wida S Cherikh; Samuel Goldfarb; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Bronwyn J Levvey; Bruno Meiser; Joseph W Rossano; Daniel C Chambers; Roger D Yusen; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Stakeholder perspectives on costs and resource expenditures: tools for addressing economic issues most relevant to patients, providers, and clinics.

Authors:  Whitney C Jones Rhodes; Debra P Ritzwoller; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-14

Review 7.  Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Iterative user centered design for development of a patient-centered fall prevention toolkit.

Authors:  Zachary Katsulis; Awatef Ergai; Wai Yin Leung; Laura Schenkel; Amisha Rai; Jason Adelman; James Benneyan; David W Bates; Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Decision making for destination therapy left ventricular assist devices: "there was no choice" versus "I thought about it an awful lot".

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; Larry A Allen; Carolyn Nowels; Andreas Brieke; Joseph C Cleveland; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-05-13

10.  Pragmatic Applications of RE-AIM for Health Care Initiatives in Community and Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Paul E Estabrooks
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.