Literature DB >> 33530511

Effects of Different Vitamin D Supplementation Schemes in Post-Menopausal Women: A Monocentric Open-Label Randomized Study.

Addolorata Corrado1, Cinzia Rotondo1, Daniela Cici1, Stefano Berardi1, Francesco Paolo Cantatore1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The improvement of muscular strength is a well-known extra-skeletal effect of Vitamin D. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the calcifediol supplementation compared to various cholecalciferol administration schedules in increasing 25(OH)D serum levels and improving muscular function.
METHODS: 107 post-menopausal women with hypovitaminosis D were assigned to receive Vitamin D supplementation according to four different regimens: colecalciferol single, monthly, or weekly oral dose and calcifediol weekly oral dose. Serum levels of 25(OH)D and muscular function of lower limbs (Sit-to-Stand test and Timed-Up-and-Go test) were evaluated at baseline and during 6 months follow-up.
RESULTS: Calcifediol and weekly cholecalciferol induced a greater and faster increase of serum 25(OH)D, compared to monthly or single-dose cholecalciferol administration. The 25(OH)D increase was associated with an improvement of muscle function of lower limbs. The larger increase of serum 25(OH)D observed with calcifediol and with weekly cholecalciferol was associated with a concomitant greater improvement of muscle strength.
CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with calcifediol is more effective and faster compared to cholecalciferol in increasing 25(OH)D serum levels and is associated with a greater improvement of muscular function, thus representing a therapeutic alternative for treatment of hypovitaminosis D.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vitamin D; Vitamin D supplementation; calcifediol; cholecalciferol; hypovitaminosis D; muscle strength

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33530511      PMCID: PMC7910885          DOI: 10.3390/nu13020380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


  45 in total

1.  Evaluation of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol dosing, 1,600 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly in older adults.

Authors:  N Binkley; D Gemar; J Engelke; R Gangnon; R Ramamurthy; D Krueger; M K Drezner
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Hypovitaminosis D myopathy without biochemical signs of osteomalacic bone involvement.

Authors:  H Glerup; K Mikkelsen; L Poulsen; E Hass; S Overbeck; H Andersen; P Charles; E F Eriksen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and rickets.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Michael F Holick; Neil C Binkley; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Catherine M Gordon; David A Hanley; Robert P Heaney; M Hassan Murad; Connie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Extraskeletal effects of vitamin D: facts, uncertainties, and controversies.

Authors:  Béatrice Bouvard; Cédric Annweiler; Agnès Sallé; Olivier Beauchet; Daniel Chappard; Maurice Audran; Erick Legrand
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Efficacy of different doses and time intervals of oral vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium in elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  V Chel; H A H Wijnhoven; J H Smit; M Ooms; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Fall prevention and vitamin D in the elderly: an overview of the key role of the non-bone effects.

Authors:  Cedric Annweiler; Manuel Montero-Odasso; Anne M Schott; Gilles Berrut; Bruno Fantino; Olivier Beauchet
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Prevention of bone loss by vitamin D supplementation in elderly women: a randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  M E Ooms; J C Roos; P D Bezemer; W J van der Vijgh; L M Bouter; P Lips
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Vitamin D3 and calcidiol are not equipotent.

Authors:  Cristina Navarro-Valverde; Manuel Sosa-Henríquez; Maria Rosa Alhambra-Expósito; José Manuel Quesada-Gómez
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 10.  Is calcifediol better than cholecalciferol for vitamin D supplementation?

Authors:  J M Quesada-Gomez; R Bouillon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency with Calcifediol: Efficacy and Safety Profile and Predictability of Efficacy.

Authors:  Jose-Luis Pérez-Castrillon; Ricardo Usategui-Martín; Pawel Pludowski
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Effect of Calcifediol on Physical Performance and Muscle Strength Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Barbagallo; Nicola Veronese; Agnese Di Prazza; Francesco Pollicino; Luca Carruba; Anna La Carrubba; Ligia J Dominguez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 3.  Vitamin D Sources, Metabolism, and Deficiency: Available Compounds and Guidelines for Its Treatment.

Authors:  Ligia J Dominguez; Mario Farruggia; Nicola Veronese; Mario Barbagallo
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-04-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.