Literature DB >> 33529270

Personalized Monitoring Model for Electrocardiogram Signals: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Rado Kotorov1, Lianhua Chi2, Min Shen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for remote electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring has increased drastically in an attempt to prevent the spread of the virus and keep vulnerable individuals with less severe cases out of hospitals. Enabling clinicians to set up remote patient ECG monitoring easily and determining how to classify the ECG signals accurately so relevant alerts are sent in a timely fashion is an urgent problem to be addressed for remote patient monitoring (RPM) to be adopted widely. Hence, a new technique is required to enable routine and widespread use of RPM, as is needed due to COVID-19.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this research is to create a robust and easy-to-use solution for personalized ECG monitoring in real-world settings that is precise, easily configurable, and understandable by clinicians.
METHODS: In this paper, we propose a Personalized Monitoring Model (PMM) for ECG data based on motif discovery. Motif discovery finds meaningful or frequently recurring patterns in patient ECG readings. The main strategy is to use motif discovery to extract a small sample of personalized motifs for each individual patient and then use these motifs to predict abnormalities in real-time readings of that patient using an artificial logical network configured by a physician.
RESULTS: Our approach was tested on 30 minutes of ECG readings from 32 patients. The average diagnostic accuracy of the PMM was always above 90% and reached 100% for some parameters, compared to 80% accuracy for the Generalized Monitoring Models (GMM). Regardless of parameter settings, PMM training models were generated within 3-4 minutes, compared to 1 hour (or longer, with increasing amounts of training data) for the GMM.
CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed PMM almost eliminates many of the training and small sample issues associated with GMMs. It also addresses accuracy and computational cost issues of the GMM, caused by the uniqueness of heartbeats and training issues. In addition, it addresses the fact that doctors and nurses typically do not have data science training and the skills needed to configure, understand, and even trust existing black box machine learning models. ©Rado Kotorov, Lianhua Chi, Min Shen. Originally published in JMIR Biomedical Engineering (http://biomedeng.jmir.org), 29.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; ECG; electrocardiogram; heart disease; monitoring; motif discovery; personalized monitoring model; time series

Year:  2020        PMID: 33529270      PMCID: PMC7814508          DOI: 10.2196/24388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2561-3278


  16 in total

1.  Using wavelet transform and fuzzy neural network for VPC detection from the Holter ECG.

Authors:  Liang-Yu Shyu; Ying-Hsuan Wu; Weichih Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Deep Learning in Medicine-Promise, Progress, and Challenges.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Lawrence Peter Casalino; Dhruv Khullar
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Riccardo Miotto; Fei Wang; Shuang Wang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Joel T Dudley
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  A machine learning approach to multi-level ECG signal quality classification.

Authors:  Qiao Li; Cadathur Rajagopalan; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Machine Learning for Healthcare: On the Verge of a Major Shift in Healthcare Epidemiology.

Authors:  Jenna Wiens; Erica S Shenoy
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  The future of remote ECG monitoring systems.

Authors:  Shu-Li Guo; Li-Na Han; Hong-Wei Liu; Quan-Jin Si; De-Feng Kong; Fu-Su Guo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 7.  Deep learning and alternative learning strategies for retrospective real-world clinical data.

Authors:  David Chen; Sijia Liu; Paul Kingsbury; Sunghwan Sohn; Curtis B Storlie; Elizabeth B Habermann; James M Naessens; David W Larson; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-05-30

8.  Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural network.

Authors:  Antônio H Ribeiro; Manoel Horta Ribeiro; Gabriela M M Paixão; Derick M Oliveira; Paulo R Gomes; Jéssica A Canazart; Milton P S Ferreira; Carl R Andersson; Peter W Macfarlane; Wagner Meira; Thomas B Schön; Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Opportunities and challenges in developing deep learning models using electronic health records data: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cao Xiao; Edward Choi; Jimeng Sun
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Electrocardiogram Sampling Frequency Range Acceptable for Heart Rate Variability Analysis.

Authors:  Ohhwan Kwon; Jinwoo Jeong; Hyung Bin Kim; In Ho Kwon; Song Yi Park; Ji Eun Kim; Yuri Choi
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2018-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.