Dae-Woong Ham1, Ho-Joong Kim2,3, Jae Heouk Choi1, Jiwon Park1, Junpyo Lee4, Jin S Yeom1. 1. Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. oshjkim@gmail.com. 3. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Republic of Korea. oshjkim@gmail.com. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate the usefulness of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score to predict postoperative mechanical failure in the elderly (mean age, 70.5 years) individuals with severe sagittal imbalance. METHODS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled: mechanical complications (MC), minor mechanical complications (mMC), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and revision surgery occurred in 61% (51/84), 58% (49/84), 44% (37/84), and 13% (11/84) of the patients, respectively. The GAP score was calculated using the X-ray obtained in the early postoperative period. The validity of the GAP score's predictive ability was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curve. Univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran-Armitage test of trend were performed to determine the association between mechanical complications and GAP score. RESULTS: The discriminatory power of GAP score to predict MC, mMC, and PJF was "moderately accurate," with an AUC of 0.839 (confidence interval [CI] 0.755-0.824, p < 0.001), 0.836 (CI 0.749-0.923, p < 0.001), and 0.702 (CI 0.588-0.851, p < 0.001), respectively. The GAP score showed a statistically significant association with MC, mMC, and PJF in univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran-Armitage test for trend. However, it was not significantly associated with revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This study showed promising results regarding the GAP score's predictive power for MC, mMC, and PJF in the elderly population with degenerative kyphoscoliosis. Using the GAP score, we can determine the patient's specific correction goal preoperatively to prevent mechanical failure based on individual patient's characteristics such as pelvic incidence.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate the usefulness of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score to predict postoperative mechanical failure in the elderly (mean age, 70.5 years) individuals with severe sagittal imbalance. METHODS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled: mechanical complications (MC), minor mechanical complications (mMC), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and revision surgery occurred in 61% (51/84), 58% (49/84), 44% (37/84), and 13% (11/84) of the patients, respectively. The GAP score was calculated using the X-ray obtained in the early postoperative period. The validity of the GAP score's predictive ability was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curve. Univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran-Armitage test of trend were performed to determine the association between mechanical complications and GAP score. RESULTS: The discriminatory power of GAP score to predict MC, mMC, and PJF was "moderately accurate," with an AUC of 0.839 (confidence interval [CI] 0.755-0.824, p < 0.001), 0.836 (CI 0.749-0.923, p < 0.001), and 0.702 (CI 0.588-0.851, p < 0.001), respectively. The GAP score showed a statistically significant association with MC, mMC, and PJF in univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran-Armitage test for trend. However, it was not significantly associated with revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This study showed promising results regarding the GAP score's predictive power for MC, mMC, and PJF in the elderly population with degenerative kyphoscoliosis. Using the GAP score, we can determine the patient's specific correction goal preoperatively to prevent mechanical failure based on individual patient's characteristics such as pelvic incidence.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adult spinal deformity; Elderly patients; Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score; Mechanical complications; Sagittal alignment
Authors: Daniel M Sciubba; Alp Yurter; Justin S Smith; Michael P Kelly; Justin K Scheer; C Rory Goodwin; Virginie Lafage; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Khaled Kebaish; Frank Schwab; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2015-10-28
Authors: Doniel Drazin; Ali Shirzadi; Jack Rosner; Paula Eboli; Michael Safee; Eli M Baron; John C Liu; Frank L Acosta Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: R Chris Glattes; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Anthony Rinella; Charles Edwards Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: E Quarto; A Zanirato; M Pellegrini; S Vaggi; F Vitali; S Bourret; J C Le Huec; M Formica Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-09-25 Impact factor: 2.721